Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The math in plain numbers:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:29 PM
Original message
The math in plain numbers:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/29/delegate.counter/index.html

Now enter in these numbers for each remaining contest (which seem reasonable)

Kentucky 34-17 Hillary
Oregon 29-23 Obama
Montana 9-7 Obama
South Dakota 8-7 Obama
Puerto Rico 31-24 Hillary

Then use the superdelegate bar to find out what percentage of superdelegates Hillary needs (and conversely how many more Obama needs.) Truth can hurt, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why does everyone have Clinton winning Puerto Rico?
I think she's going to lose there, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So far, she's done VERY well with Latino voters. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. One can't assume Puerto Ricans will vote as American Latino voters did.
Edited on Mon May-19-08 01:39 PM by sparosnare
Ethnic Groups of Puerto Rico:

White 80% (Most are of Spanish heritage)

Black 8%;

Amerindian 0.4%;

Asian 0.2%;

mixed and other 10.9%

Of course I fully expect Hillary to tell them she will make Puerto Rico a state if elected as she did Guam; so that may help her a bit. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. As a puerto rican latina, I can certainly say that Obama has strong support in PR.
My aunt replays some of his rallies at a community center in Ponce and literally hundreds show up to watch.

They are very receptive to the message of change.

Also, Puerto Ricans have not forgotten about Vieques

Clinton Proposes Concessions On
Navy Training; Puerto Rico Says 'No'
Updated 8.25 p.m. ET (0125 GMT) December 3, 1999

AP- WASHINGTON — President Clinton said Friday that Navy bombing practice on the Puerto Rican island of Vieques would resume next spring at a sharply reduced level and only with dummy bombs. He offered Puerto Rico $40 million to go along with the plan, which includes phasing out all training on the island within five years. Puerto Rican Gov. Pedro Rossello quickly rejected the plan, leaving the Navy with no assurance it will ever regain full use of its "crown jewel" of training ranges. Rossello's resistance also raised questions about what Clinton would do if protesters who are camped out on the bombing range refuse to leave next spring.

Clinton's plan would mean that for the next five years the Navy and Marines would train only with "inert," or dummy, bombs on Vieques instead of the live ammunition that is part of advanced combat training.

After that, the Navy would get out of Vieques altogether. But even those concession were too little, Rossello said.

A visibly disappointed Rossello told reporters in San Juan, "Personally I feel deceived with the position that's been taken because it doesn't faithfully reflect what we have been discussing with the president."

<snip>

Puerto Ricans have long objected to the Navy's practice bombing on Vieques, but the controversy boiled over after a civilian security guard was killed by an errant bomb in April. The Navy then suspended training on Vieques but has sought a way to resume it.

No sooner had Pentagon officials spelled out publicly the details of Clinton's plan than Rossello rejected it. The governor, a staunch Clinton ally who supports making Puerto Rico the 51st U.S. state, told a news conference in San Juan he could accept no arrangement that included a resumption of Navy training on Vieques.

Rossello called Clinton's plan "unacceptable for the people of Puerto Rico and the people of Vieques." He added, however, that he was willing to continue talks in hopes of finding a mutually acceptable solution.


The dispute presents Clinton with a tricky challenge: to try to win back Puerto Rican support for the Navy without making so many concessions that the Navy and Marine Corps cannot train adequately.

http://www.vieques-island.com/navy/clinton.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We give the pessimistic numbers
So that we can't be accused of biasing them for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm giving her a good scenario
Just to show how overwhelmingly difficult it is even in such a scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Clinton wins every remaining race by 42 points (71-29)...INCLUDING superdelegates...
Edited on Mon May-19-08 01:33 PM by MercutioATC
...Obama still breaks 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think Obama will have larger victory margins in OR, MT and SD
He has consistently done very well in mountain west states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He might, but I'm making this a decent scenario for Hillary
Basically giving her as good as she can do without Obama eating live babies on national TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama does not need even one more "automatic delegate"
Obama is currently about 112 delegates shy of the 2025 needed to secure the nomination. Obama is likely to gain at least 90 more pledged delegates by the final contest (your pessimistic numbers were at 87). Other than the automatic superdelegates, there are the add-on delegates elected by the state delegations to the national conventions. These add-on superdelegates have tended to break to the winner of that state as the winner's delegates make up the majority of the delegations. Based on the results and likely results, Obama will take at least 25 of these add-on delegates. Without even a single automatic superdelegates endorsing him between now and June 3rd, he will cross the 2025 mark. And of course we know there are some "Pelosi Club" delegates that he is going to pick up to pad his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Even with an 85-15 split of all remaining primaries and a 60-40 split of the supers
Edited on Mon May-19-08 02:05 PM by briv1016
Obama wins 2015-2026. And that doesn't count the add-ons from yesterday or the 3 supers from today. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC