|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:55 PM Original message |
Who is Hillary's "If we were Republicans I would already be the nominee" line supposed to appeal to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. She is saying if the Democrats were Republicans she would be the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Well she is saying that if we had winner take all primaries like Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. No, she is saying if the Dem primary was run as the GOP primary she woudl be winning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Triagulation: Her weapon of first resort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Triangulation is what bush has done for 8 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. yeah .. if a Republican lost ELEVEN primaries in a row, I don't think they would be the Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. Heh. How dare you challenge the Queen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisa58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. her supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
6. Then she should have run in the repuke primary. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jezebel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. Republican superdelegates? She's hoping Rush Limbaugh can create some to save the day. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. She was referring to the winner take all nature of GOP primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Duh. That wasn't the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. As an appeal, it is probably targeted at the Superdelegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. I think she's trying to imply that "identity politics" is causing all this division. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. Depends on what the meaning of "if" is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. shows how dumb our primary system is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Just how is "winner take all" a preferable way to choose delegates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent-Voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
15. Her low-information base perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
16. It's suppose to be another talking point for media and her minions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
19. The true picture of Clinton, and of her supporters, who wish we were more republican-like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. If We Were Republicans, We'd Hear Alot More About the Blue Dress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-05-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Then by your own words we must be Republicans. All the vile shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC