Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robo-Call-Gate: staunch Obama supporter on the board

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:39 PM
Original message
Robo-Call-Gate: staunch Obama supporter on the board
Oops.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Obama_camp_responds_to_robocalls.html">Obama camp responds to robocalls
In a conference call with reporters, Obama aides tentatively accepted the Women's Voices Women Vote apology for ill-timed robocalls, but simultenously compared the calls to deliberate voter suppression tactics.

...

There are some arguing that this was a pro-Clinton conspiracy, rather than a disruptive mistake, as the group claims; those suggestions are based in part on the fact that Maggie Williams used to be on the group's board, and that it's staffed with other former Clinton types.

This seems, so far, unconvincing to me. Also on the board, for instance, is William McNary, the president of the progressive coalition USAction and a leader of Illinois Citizen Action who has been, reportedly, a vigorous Obama supporters since his 2004 Senate race.


--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. it looks like election fraud is bipartisan and widespread..
that makes me feel soooo much more confident in our election system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. It can be assumed that any sort of mainstream moderate/liberal political group
will have somebody in it that's connected to the Clintons somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. McNary may be an Obama supporter, but he doesn't appear to have contributed to his POTUS race, as
far as I can tell from the open secrets data search.

So what does "staunch" mean?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It means "I'm trying to tilt this story to protect my candidate."
Edited on Thu May-01-08 12:18 AM by writes3000
There is no excuse for this kind of voter suppression crap. None.

And it's near impossible to believe that this is a mistake that's gone from state to state to state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yea but the rest of the board members are hillary supporters...
ohh and the executive director was a former Bill Clinton campaign guy. ohh snap..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. And no mention of Rendell vote suppression over machines poorly allocated and broken.
Her win was not so big and decisive, despite the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. "Rendell vote suppression" = "My candidate lost"
When Obama wins, the People's Voice has been heard and Justice has triumphed.

When Clinton wins, it was because of fraud, crooked deals, and the hand of Satan.

And to think, a lot of Obama supporters really believe that.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder how much of this is campaign hackery...
I remember one of the guests on the Daily Show was a former GOP strategy hack that ended up spending time in prison for his misdeeds, then came clean and wrote a book about the things he did.

On the show, he mentioned one of his dirty tricks.

Say you're a Republican candidate that needs money, and SleazeCo is offering you loads of cash to help you out in exchange for whitewashing their misdeeds.

But, you don't want the fact you took money from SleazeCo to be used against you. What to do...

You take the money, then you ask SleazeCo to make a small donation to your opponent. Just a basic donation on the web site or by phone or mail. Chances are your opponent won't even figure out he got a donation from SleazeCo - it's one name of thousands on the donor list.

Then when you get attacked by your opponent for taking money from SleazeCo, you immediately retaliate with "YOU HAVE A LOT OF NERVE TO BRING THAT UP, CONSIDERING YOU ALSO TOOK MONEY FROM SLEAZECO! LOOK AT THE HYPOCRISY!!!!!!!111one"

I suspect we have the same sort of trickery here from the Clinton campaign, or a related dirty trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good. Maybe now we can get to the things that matter most to this
nation like Jeremiah Wright and the obvious problem Obama has with being sufficiently patriotic or being enough of a good American.








:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fermezlabush Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh, noes! It's passportgate all over again! Only without KO!
Will yesterday's outrage stop now? or will they simply ignore this fact and go on as usual? Stay tuned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. The group is trying to register Dems for the GE. I'll bet the GOP AGs try to make them stop.
Edited on Thu May-01-08 06:26 AM by McCamy Taylor
And look, now Obama supporters are trying to suppress a voter registration group.

Are you happy? You have just helped out the GOP vote suppression effort. Get a life and get back on the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. If you've ever worked in elections
Edited on Thu May-01-08 08:03 AM by marions ghost
you'd know that this fits a classic pattern of sewing confusion before elections.
-------------
For background, GO TO:
http://www.southernstudies.org/facingsouth/
(This page has been updated since yesterday to reflect the NC AG's actions).

---------------
The Institute for Southern Studies --which brought attention to this questionable activity by WVWV --is a well-respected PROGRESSIVE organization based in North Carolina. Info from their website:

"Since our founding in 1970 by veterans of the civil rights movement, the has established a national reputation as an essential resource for grassroots activists, community leaders, scholars, policy makers and others working to bring lasting social and economic change to the region.

Throughout our history, the Institute has maintained a strong commitment to developing research and publication projects that directly support grassroots organizing, especially efforts for corporate and government accountability. It has also led the Institute to be involved in the launching of such organizations as the Brown Lung Association, Southerners for Economic justice, the Georgia Power Project, and the Gulf Tenants Leadership Development Project. The Institute has also examined the southern contribution to culture and social change, from gospel music and the blues to the civil rights movement and community organizing. Since 1973, the Institute's journal, Southern Exposure, has gained critical praise for its thorough investigations, unsentimental portraits of Southern life, and resources for change."

------------------
According to the Institute for Southern Studies, the WVWV group has negatively affected the primaries in these states:

Arizona
Colorado
Wisconsin
Michigan
Florida
Arkansas
Louisiana
Kentucky
Ohio
Virginia
North Carolina

How can you argue that this WVWV group is "helping"? Of course they would appreciate and count on your defense of "they're just trying to register Dem voters." If we EVER want fair elections in this country, this must be investigated. No matter WHO might be involved, this is NOT a "nothing-to-see-here" situation. This is about election integrity. This goes to the core of what we progressives are all about. Take off your blinders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I'm sorry. You need to inform yourself more fully
This group has raised suspicions because of similar tactics in over a dozen other states. No matter how invested you are in Clinton, accepting these tactics and trying to paint them as legitimate is not at all helpful.

You need to inform yourself and stop parroting the Clinton PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. The voter registration deadline to register by mail has already passed in NC.
Edited on Thu May-01-08 08:32 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
Making any attempt to paint this as "registering voters" is further complicated considering that a.) this isn't this group's first brush with the law and b.) they blocked their contact info.

If they were honestly trying to register voters, they were doing a piss poor job of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. Even though this man was on the board there are some important questions to be answered!
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/4/30/201822/287

Obama Fans: let's suppress the women's votes

by tarheel74, Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 08:18:22 PM EST

(snip)

For example, Maggie Williams is a former member of WVWV's leadership team, according to Sourcewatch.org; she also served as chief of staff to First Lady Hillary Clinton and to the Clinton Foundation in New York, and she was named the manager of Clinton's campaign in February. And Holly Schadler, WVWV's attorney, helped set up the Back to Business Committee in 1994 to defend Bill and Hillary Clinton from attacks by political enemies.

But one of the most striking connections between WVWV and the Clinton campaign -- and one particularly relevant to a story involving what appear to be voter suppression efforts right before an election -- was pointed out to us by a reader. He notes that the firm in charge of voter outreach for WVWV is MSHC Partners, whose president is Hal Malchow. Sourcewatch.org reports that Malchow was a member of WVWV's leadership team.

At the same time, MSHC also does direct mail and outreach for the Hillary Clinton campaign. In fact, the campaign owes MSHC $807,000, according to Politico.com.

............

I don't think this man may have known what was going on in ALL the areas that were being handled by operatives of the Clinton campaign. All in all it doesn't pass the smell test!!!!!

:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. I posted this on another thread. I'm just copying and pasting.
Obama supporter here. I wanted to make an Op about this, but I've already done three in the past 24 hours.

Huffington Post has a small article/statement from the Obama supporter on the board of Womens Voices, Women vote. It is obvious that they wanted to put him out there to curb any speculation of ties to the Clinton camp (I have been saying that I don't want to assume that the Clinton campaign is connected to this). I still think that the potential campaign ties are really besides the point, because the calls seem illegal. Even if they thought they were acting within legal boundaries, it was grossly incompetent at best. As the replies to the post demostrate, the spokepeople for the group really have not been answering the questions at hand (I assume that they can't because of legal reasons at this point).


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-mcnary/womens-voices-women-vote_b_99548.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
17. Ooops, too bad.
Looks like the Obots will now have to direct their faux outrage elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. The obots seem to be pushing this debunked lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Thank you!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. One out of how many? Eight? Nine?
Nice spin attempt, but stacking one contributor up against all present or former Team Clinton members working there amuses me no end.

Oh, and the Hillraiser who runs the joint gave $700K to her husband's company to actually make the illegal robo-calls.

Can you say 'conflict of interest?' Knew you could.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC