Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Things we have to do different this fall if we want to win and if we want the win to matter.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:44 AM
Original message
Things we have to do different this fall if we want to win and if we want the win to matter.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 12:45 AM by Ken Burch
1) No "move to the center". Our chances of victory depend on mass turnout and enthusiasm. A centrist "we're just barely not THEM" campaign CAN'T generate enthusiam. Nobody who likes the status quo will vote against the GOP. And the vast majority of the voters DON'T like the status quo this year, so we don't NEED status quo types.

2) For antiwar Democrats, NO moratorium on antiwar rallies this fall. No one who still supports the war is going to vcte for us since, at this point, no non-reactionaries still back the war. Antiwar rallies keep people mobilized and keep the war in play as THE issue. No one thinks any other issue matters more. And we can't do anything about any other issues if we get elected by implying we'd keep even part of the war going. The war is the enemy of everything Democrats and real Lunch Bucket Dems stand for. Nobody wants their kids dying in this anymore.

3) No refusing to fight back against smears. Anytime you leave a smear unanswered the voters think you're admitting the smear is true.

4) No distancing the candidates from any part of our base. People are concerned about the war and the economy. They aren't obsessed with bashing the poor or with dissing "latte sippers" anymore.

The key to victory is mobilization, confidence in our message, and a fighting spirit. We can WIN as our true selves. We can't win "by default".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like we need Obama as our contender....
based on your formulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Whoever we do end up with, we all need to do what we can, from the grassroots
To assert the importance of these things.

We can't let The Beltway and "the pros" lose it for us again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, we've regressed to flag pins & preachers, it's futile. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. People Are Afraid this Will Be a Repeat of 1972
That is the reason for all of the behavior you decry here.

(Except #3, which carries the false premise that Kerry did not respond to the Swift Boaters. He did, but the media would not air it, so most people (even on DU) think it didn't happen.
Kerry could only get on TV by paying around a million dollars a minute for advertising. The FREE advertising the Swift Boaters got was easily worth several billion. That's billion with a b).

The party always lurches to the right and throws anti-war people and progressives under the bus because they still have nightmares about another 1972.

And it sure looks like we're in for another one. All the ingredients are in place.

We are having an extremely bitter and divisive primary, leaving many in our party vowing to stay home. (Not me, I'd vote for a yellow dog over McCain).

We have a very unpopular war, but the unabashedly pro-war candidate gets none of the fallout from it, and is leading in the polls.

The "Homeland Security" state puts the Watergate buggers to shame. They can (and presumably do) have a direct line from the NSA to RNC headquarters and we can't do a thing about it.

"But this time will be different!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 1972 was the nightmare it was because the regulars, the ones who insist on "tacking to the center"
Were the ones who threw McGovern under the bus, after he committed the terrible crime of beating them fair and square on the issues in the primaries.

And their approach gave us 1980, 1984, 1988, 2000 and 2004. That's five losses due to "being careful" compare to one loss caused by sabotauge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC