Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's VP will be an old white male. Discuss.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:23 AM
Original message
Obama's VP will be an old white male. Discuss.
There have been a lot of posts about either women or other minorities being placed on the ticket. While my first choice for the Democratic nomination was Richardson, I just don't see how he could make the ticket.

In my opinion, the vice president will be older and someone with experience in either Washington or in the military, to defuse worries about 'inexperience' or the national security argument that McCain has a (though ridiculous) big advantage because of his military experience.

In addition, it will be a he, and he will be white. It sucks, but at some point you have to address the fact that history is close to being made, and you don't want to push the envelope too far, because frankly we DON'T know how the public (aside from the Democratic party) will respond in such a situation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Darn!
I should be used to disappointment by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm thinking Biden. What do you think?
I used to think Clark but I highly doubt that would ever happen now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah, I don't know. I do think it will be someone with military credentials, but who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
32. I can't see him picking anyone who voted for the IWR
That eliminates Biden, Dodd, and Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. yeah, I wonder about that
does that mean he has to go with someone who voted no? or would someone just not in Congress be OK?

At least Biden did come out quite clearly that his vote and his confidence in Powell were mistakes

"I made my pitch for Biden-Lugar, , pointing out the very real constraints it put on the president.

But the president was giving personal assurances that he would try every avenue of diplomacy before he took the country to war. And it was clear that Colin Powell and members of the Joint Chiefs were not eager to go to war in Iraq. With that in mind, I decided to vote for the resolution.

I believed the resolution passed by Congress provided the firm & united support Powell needed to be able to get the United Nations Security Council to pass and enforce a new resolution that got the inspectors back into Iraq, kept Saddam in his box, and thus avoided a war. I wasn't alone in that.

I made a mistake. I underestimated the influence of Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the rest of the neocons; I vastly underestimated their disingenuousness and incompetence. So Bush went to war just the way the neocons wanted him to--without significant international backing."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Jim Webb !!...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That could be very good! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Define old, and don't discount a middle-aged Hispanic guy,
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Richardson would indeed be good!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. "define old" was my thought too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. I agree nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why not Geraldine Ferraro?
...for affirmative action :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bill Bradley, Gov. Sebelius, Gov. Napolitano, Gov. Richardson... others.
Lots of good choices.

I definitely don't think it's a racial consideration but one that will be based on who he wants to preside over the Senate. We have some very historic legislation to move through the 111th Congress and President Obama will need someone who can move it thru the legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. What about Barbara Boxer?

She is great and she would certainly hold California!

Then we would really be able to see if the sexism issue is as strong as Hillary has lead people to believe.

I like Boxer!

Obama/Boxer :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I got exactly zero problems with Barbara Boxer.
I love her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. And Obama has many (electoral AND other political) reasons to pick a female -- Boxer iz tops...
Indeed, if NOT Boxer, for whatever reasons, I would think that one of the other women people are considering (such as Karen Sebelius, and others) would be a wise choice. Though the personal disappointment of HRC would still need to be otherwise addressed, it would help unify the party, and Boxer is as good as they come.

I think that it is probably all but inevitable that Obama, if and when he becomes the presumptive nominee, would pick a white running mate. But why male? Actually, that's just following the 'dead/old' white mail meme that the OP author seems to have in mind. I don't see it as NECESSARY that his running mate be "old" (which is also a bit awkward -- if 46 is "young" and 72 is said by many -- surely unjust if McCain were a progressive Democrat, people -- to be too old, the likely age range of most experienced pols falls within a fairly narrow range (after all 46 is only 25 years younger than 72. Since we are then deciding that someone in their 60s is "old" while someone in their late 40's is "young" the meme kind of runs on its own momentum.

I think PROGRESSIVENESS, and other personal qualities (as in Barbara Boxer) are more crucial to discuss than issues like the 'oldness' or the 'whiteness' of the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. Progressiveness is an excellent choice

To me, Barbara Boxer is a class act.

I saw her speak during one of those campaign sound bites and I looked at her and said to myself, she would be a great President.

I also noticed the difference between Boxer and Pelosi and really was struck with how much more "forthright" Boxer seems to be.

I'm new to being a Boxer fan so help me if you have more information or thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. I would love Boxer, but she might be too easy to paint as a librul treehugger
because of her work on the environment. The whole "OMG, She's a librul from San Francisco!!!1!" thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
34.  I see your point
but I still see that the self identified "feminists" in the party would not take kindly to a White woman not being on the ticket.

I believe that if Obama gets the nomination,the issue of "experience" will not be important - because he will have won over "the experienced candidate" self identified.

By the way, I'm African American and I like Biden a lot.

He has made some slip ups regarding RACE issues but I honestly don't believe that he meant them because he has apologized sincerely for them.

His honesty is different from the approach that HC and Bill have taken in this race.

I can't speak for all my people but I do believe they would accept him for his leadership ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. thanks for that
When I heard Biden's worst remark I cringed because I knew the media would pounce and it would overwhelm his own announcement. As someone who stumbles over my own words, I would love it if someone called me articulate (which I think of as being able to think on one's feet and say just the right thing) - so to me it was pretty ironic that someone stumbled verbally while praising someone else for being articulate and noone looked at it that way. Then I was listening to News and Notes on NPR and learned about articulate being a code word or snide remark - I'm a white woman who grew up in the south but have spent my whole adult life in the north and I honesty didn't know that.

Obama's kind defense of Biden at the Iowa debate was really nice - like when he helped Richardson out at the debate. Obama never exploited this for an attack on Biden. And Obama's main point - look at Biden's record on civil rights - is how I always approached it.

Biden trips up verbally because he speaks honestly - and that is worth tons to me. As he claims, he tells people what they need to hear, regardless of the consequences. Obama's speech on race was refreshing to me for the same reason - he didn't flinch from saying things that would be un-PC to blacks or whites.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Bradley! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. No way under the sun will it be a woman.........
and most certainly not a woman from Arizona. Not a snowball's chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sadly, I agree... I think Richardson would be perfect...
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 09:39 AM by CitizenLeft
...and it would garnish a large chunk of the Latino vote (which he may have gotten anyway, depending on how much McCain would flip his own policies on immigration to please the xenophobic far right). But I think it's probably too risky to do that.

A white man with foreign policy and/or military experience. While Joe Biden would, on paper, be good, he doesn't bring a state with him. I like Webb, but the flack about his book (you know the one) would resurface and in my opinion, is just too problematic. I wish Edwards had more experience himself, or he'd be my choice... but he's in the same boat, as far as foreign policy is concerned. Kerry, of course, would also be perfect, but I don't see him doing that. And MA, of course, will go blue anyway.

How about Jack Murtha? He's from PA, might very well guarantee that state. Would he do it? Dunno.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Webb, Zinni, Etc
Obama knows that Iraq is an enormous and continuing clusterfuck that has to be untangled carefully. I expect he'll pick someone with a military background to offset and attack McCain, and to help stanch the bleeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
40ozDonkey Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. I like Webb, he'll pack heat at the ceremonies.
I love the senator, I kid the senator.

Webb's only a junior senator but if I remember right he was Sec. of the Navy in the 80's. That would counterbalance McCain well, but I don't know if it would compliment Obama well.

It's gonna be a tough decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Junior senator but former Admiral of the Navy!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. Who has more foreign policy experience than Richardson?
He is the perfect choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. Webb?
Why not him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe not if it is Richardson. But I think Biden would be best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. Obama's VP will be a white female, probably a governor of a swing state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Richardson isn't an old white man. Discuss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galactical Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. I was thinking Sebelius a few months ago...
I think obama will probably have to appease the growing resentment of white women for beating their candidate (Hillary). But i don't know, he really needs a military/foreign policy VP. This could go anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. Isn't there a better position than VP

for a military man/woman?

All I can think of is that Cheney was VP and he acted like a Defense Secretary to everyone's dismay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. ?
The conventional wisdom would suggest an old, white, southern military man. But when has Obama followed the conventional wisdom? We'll see. I think we might be surprsied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. I don't know about that -
Obama and Richardson strike me as quite the 'Dynamic Duo'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wesley Clark
I know he's supporting Clinton. But, when the primaries are over I could see this happening if Obama wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
31. Jim Webb, Bob Graham, or Gary Hart
I would like to see any of those three. They were all opposed to the war, and they all have the military/foreign policy gravitas that you are talking about. I don't think the VP will be any of the other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty fender Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
33. Sam Nunn, in your scenario. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
35. Richard Clarke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
36. How much is the country changing? Richardson might be a good choice...
I've always wanted someone military like Clark or Zinni to see republican heads explode in frustration. But Richardson has good credentials and would enhance the multi-cultural outreach and unifying message of this campaign in a powerful way. My thinking is a bit split now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm not so sure. He's been very clear about a new direction.
I don't know how he could continue to argue effectively that he represents a new day in politics if he selects a fossil as a running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. OK. That's fine, but absolutely no republicans!!
That's my line in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. It could be female, but probably not a minority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
41. Wesley Clark?
:bounce:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
42. Fortunately, some old white guys are awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
43. It doesn't have to be someone with experience in Washington
because that implies a Senator. It could be someone with good executive experience like a Govenor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Yeah, I agree. It won't be a fellow Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. George Mitchell!!!!!!!!Home run vp pick!!
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 12:21 PM by Tropics_Dude83
George Mitchell is our Dick Cheney. He'd be perfect. TREMENDOUS credentials in foreign affairs, domestic affairs, etc. He's our James Baker, our Dick Cheney etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC