Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Simple Explanation for Why Passportgate is More Stupidity than Conspiracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:48 PM
Original message
Simple Explanation for Why Passportgate is More Stupidity than Conspiracy
Three separate breaches, three separate morons caught

All morons caught the same way.

If conspiracy, wouldn't morons have changed their methods to avoid being caught times two and three?

This is nosy-bodies fulfilling a personal curiosity, and little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Look at the dates they did it.
There's a pattern there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. can you explain the pattern
what I read earlier sounded like people were looking during early in the primary season, but I don't see how that can distinguish curiosity (who's this guy in the news, or even who's this Muslim guy I read about in that email) vs. an organized conspiracy which would also be active at the same calendar time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is only one way to get into the files. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Occam's Razor.
OTOH -- the timing is a bit suspicious. I'm not assuming anything right now, either malice or incompetence. It could be either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why weren't the names of the individuals released then? Something smells
and downplaying it will not make it go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. your right it would take a single access and then they would copy the file
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. thanks for clearing that up..I'm glad that's settled now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. not so fast...
3 separate morons caught all the same way.

1st moron caught, fired

2nd moron knew it was illegal after 1st moron fired, but did it anyway

3rd moron knew 2 were fired for it, and did it anyway.

It is not curiousity at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. In the Bush administration, incompetence is rewarded. Most likely
all three are getting promotions, reference Condi Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. I suspect someone is trying to create sympathy for Obama.
They wanted to be caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. your stupidity knows no bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Look who's talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
26.  it is a fact that your post is extremely stupid. live with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. Apparently you can't live without it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. yes I can, ignore, bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Now I can regularly talk to her and she won't know what I'm saying.
Sounds like a good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. seems like you have too much time on your hands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Did somebody say something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. Can you hear me now?
:(





























:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Don't you just get tired of writing nonsense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Welcome to DU.
Does that answer your question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. Of course
People regularly want their careers ruined to highlight a minor blip in a primary campaign.

Wouldn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. Check this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
44. You would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Don't get me started Fork. You know you always lose.
Just kidding. How ya doin? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #47
63. Don't act like we're friends...we're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. And no one alerted the supervisors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. OMC made a very good point on another thread
Three separate breaches, three separate morons, ok. But why did every one of these morons, who were allegedly just being nosy, look at Obama's file and no other? Why not poke into someone else's file, too, while they were at it? It's too much of a stretch to assume that al three were curious about Obama only and no one else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. exactly!!!!!!!!!!! thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. do we know they only looked at that one? not doubting you, just asking
since I hadn't heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. If they had they would have said it by now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. which they, media or State Dept.? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. They release what they want us to know. We're talkin Rove here for chrisakes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. are we hearing them talk about any other
candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. no, but I thought this was about more than just candidates
(they could have looked at Al Gore's or whatever) and I'm not sure if you mean "them" as state dept. or as media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. exactly!!!
plenty of passports and they chose to look at Obama's.....hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
39. Probably because they've been digging up crap on Clinton for years
And have now turned their full attention on Obama, since he's been doing well. I don't buy the "curious freelancer" story at all. I think it was a deliberate effort. But I think it was the Republicans. It's their M.O. From Watergate, to sniffing Bill Clinton's travels, to this, it has all the hallmarks of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
66. If they were republicans, why not look at HRCs files as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
67. Ooooops...there goes that objection...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. You do know the contractor is DynCorp
you also know they are tied by the hip to the NEOCON faction of the GOP.

Looks innocent, by design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:01 AM
Original message
Jeez, I'm having a deja vu here. Seriously, I feel like I was in this thread
a few years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
40. Well, perhaps you should realize truly
who is workign for who, Consular services used to be Guv'ment run, but was privatized

Now you were, symbolically. And that was 1991, when State looked at Clinton's passport files too... you telling me that it was not political either?

Wrong party though to think that it was the Dems.

Connect some dots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. I couldn't agree more.
I didn't know it was privatized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. I learned that myself today, and DYNCORP has the contract
they might be Mercs, remember they ran a lot of the crap at abu ghraib, but last thing hey need is a dem in charge. If that happens there might be charges.

So you get your opposition research now, kind of preventive to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Me tired. I can't keep up with the Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #58
64. Yeah but right now we are seeing a lot of sand in eyes
and shooting my foot off instead of keeping eye on price

Personally I don't like either democrats, but hell, will hold nose and vote for either, since they SHOULD be better than the current corruption... but we sill need to connect dots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. And Nixon's Watergate was "just a third-rate burglary"
Until some reporters did some digging and stumbled upon a knowledgable source they called "Deep Throat".

This has happened BEFORE--see the GDP thread at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5181535
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
56. Riiiiiiiiiight! We'll find out(maybe)
if this goes deeper than curiousity worth getting fired over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. Were they curious about other people?
Did they also check into rock stars and celebrities, or were they each just HUGE Obama fans? At the moment it seems that three separate people all decided to check the same file, by some goofy coincidence, and that smells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. Exactly, it was curious individuals, statistically Obama supporters, nothing more.
If you were really trying to get info about a candidate you wouldn't do it via such easily caught means, and you certainly wouldn't do it three whole times.

Once is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. So how did the Bill Clinton
passportgate turn out back in 1992?

didn't they trace that to the Bush admin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. I heard on the news that the ppl who snooped were REPUGS!
Not obama supporters, nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. that's what I heard too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #33
55. Therefore not Clinton. (Can you hear me noooooooow?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Not necessarily.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Ever hear of a Presidential Pardon? They don't care if they get caught anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. you got that right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
43. Olbermann is no doubt pushing this really hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
48. Maybe so but you never know
Politics makes people do crazy things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
52. No.....I don't buy this. There is no evidence that it was "curiousity"
except for that being the excuse.

I'm charitable at times, but I'm not stupid.

The State department also told me that Iraq had WMDs. I didn't buy that either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #52
59. And I'm wondering if whomever did this
would have really wanted it to come out and put such a halt to the Pastor Wright insanity on m$$$$m?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Cui bono, Bama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
53. And when the Clinton connection comes out
don't forget to tell us it's all be a big misunderstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. Do us all a favor and hold your breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
62. Hey, remember when that SOMALI picture of Obama came out and no one knew where it came from?
Something smells really really fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Yeah, and who was the Black congresswoman(hilary supporter)
who was talking on some show about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC