Was that somehow the Clinton Campaign convinced some Ohioans to vote for her despite the fact that BILL CLINTON signed NAFTA.
HE F-in SIGNED IT. She was in the WH gaining all of the so-called experience on her resume. She did nothing. She says she was against it... (which I call BS on) and she says she is a "doer" well then why the Hell did she sit on her ass and do nothing but "think" it might not be the best thing? She didn't take any f-in action to stop it.
Tell that to the thousands of people that have seen their jobs eliminated and benefits disappear as factories have closed all over Ohio.
That is the GD NAFTA lie.
The Clintons gave us NAFTA.
I still can't understand how she got any Union endorsements in Ohio. They HATE and I mean HATE NAFTA. NAFTA contributes to the declining support among Union members for the Democratic Party. The Union members are sold on the fact that the Republicans will let them keep their guns, and they lost faith in the Dems to stand up for them b/c of freakin' NAFTA.
I know PA is similar to Ohio in this respect, so PA DUers - don't forget this. Remind your neighbors who signed NAFTA. Don't let them be bamboozled like my fellow Ohioans were.
How about not being accountable for the GD bills signed by the Administration that you claim on your resume and trying to project it onto another candidate b/c someone in their campaign may or may not have said something about it to someone in Canada.
Clinton pushed NAFTA through Congress using supplemental agreements to ameliorate worker and environmental issues
NAFTA created jobs during the earlier part of Clinton's administration....as indeed the economic models said it would. However fundamental issues in Mexico's economy which were misunderstood were not adequately factored in the analysis.
Since I know for a fact that jobs in the industry I was working in the 80's were already being exported from the US....I'm not going to foolish enough to blame the outsourcing issue on NAFTA. Yes, there have been some job losses to NAFTA partners but there have been benefits from NAFTA parties as well.
was that NAFTA became law (under international law) once it was approved by the three countries legislatures....it didn't not require a second US Presidential signature
...to stop the corruption at the University Of Chicago hospital, where his wife was one of the VPs. And unlike Hillary, Barack actually had SOME power to something about it, since he was a Illinois State Senator at the time.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.