Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Truth about the NAFTA lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:23 PM
Original message
The Truth about the NAFTA lie
Was that somehow the Clinton Campaign convinced some Ohioans to vote for her despite the fact that BILL CLINTON signed NAFTA.

HE F-in SIGNED IT. She was in the WH gaining all of the so-called experience on her resume. She did nothing. She says she was against it... (which I call BS on) and she says she is a "doer" well then why the Hell did she sit on her ass and do nothing but "think" it might not be the best thing? She didn't take any f-in action to stop it.

Tell that to the thousands of people that have seen their jobs eliminated and benefits disappear as factories have closed all over Ohio.

That is the GD NAFTA lie.

The Clintons gave us NAFTA.

I still can't understand how she got any Union endorsements in Ohio. They HATE and I mean HATE NAFTA. NAFTA contributes to the declining support among Union members for the Democratic Party. The Union members are sold on the fact that the Republicans will let them keep their guns, and they lost faith in the Dems to stand up for them b/c of freakin' NAFTA.

I know PA is similar to Ohio in this respect, so PA DUers - don't forget this. Remind your neighbors who signed NAFTA. Don't let them be bamboozled like my fellow Ohioans were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. They also know that Obama supports NAFTA.
The two candidates are identical -- they support free trade, but want to adjust it to have less impact on manufacturing and similar jobs.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Clinton signed NAFTA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hillary signed NAFTA? Who knew?
:shrug:

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Clinton signed NAFTA
you know, the Clinton Administration
the 2 for 1
where she got all of her so called experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Stop the presses! Campaign rhetoric now signs treaties!
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. you want campaign rhetoric?
How about not being accountable for the GD bills signed by the Administration that you claim on your resume and trying to project it onto another candidate b/c someone in their campaign may or may not have said something about it to someone in Canada.

That is the lie.

she owns NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Well, she sure wants us to believe she was instrumental in big decisions like that.
Sorry, she doesn't get to cherry pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. NAFTA sure helped Hillary's ex-employer Wal-Mart. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. and Bush41 agreed to it - and side agreement with no enforcement was Congressional decision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. And NAFTA gave the US oil; Obama voted to extend NAFTA to Peru.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Obamans always seem to forget about that Peru Trade Deal.
Inconvenient facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ohioans could tell that Clinton supported review of NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ohioans should have remembered who signed it
when machines were unbolted from the floor, loaded onto trucks and shipped to Mexico.

They should have remembered who signed it and caused Union support for the Dem party to nose dive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bush Sr signed NAFTA
Clinton signed worker and environmental protections which were supplemental agreements
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Clinton signed NAFTA into law. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. NAFTA signed by all three countries 12/17/92
Clinton pushed NAFTA through Congress using supplemental agreements to ameliorate worker and environmental issues

NAFTA created jobs during the earlier part of Clinton's administration....as indeed the economic models said it would. However fundamental issues in Mexico's economy which were misunderstood were not adequately factored in the analysis.

Since I know for a fact that jobs in the industry I was working in the 80's were already being exported from the US....I'm not going to foolish enough to blame the outsourcing issue on NAFTA. Yes, there have been some job losses to NAFTA partners but there have been benefits from NAFTA parties as well.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. what part of signed into law did you miss?
Bill Clinton signed it into law. the side agreements were not enforceable.

Clinton signed a job killing trade agreement into law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The agreement signed by President Bush
was that NAFTA became law (under international law) once it was approved by the three countries legislatures....it didn't not require a second US Presidential signature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. the law passed by congress was signed by Clinton
he touts it on his resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yes, he does. But as far as I know it did not require a second
US presidents signature. President Bush's signature was sufficient once Congress past it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. well, now we agree
Clinton did sign it, touts in on his resume and Hill wants to run on his resume.

It was a job killing trade deal that Bill signed into law and the Clintons tout as a success.

That is much more important than if someone in a campaign spoke to someone in another country about campaign rhetoric.

There is the lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Don't bother them with facts, their minds are made up.
They also believe that Bill initiated the Iraq sanctions (passed in 1990 by the UN).

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. fact is Clinton signed NAFTA into law. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danzo Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. Whorebama Didn't Do Anything...
...to stop the corruption at the University Of Chicago hospital, where his wife was one of the VPs. And unlike Hillary, Barack actually had SOME power to something about it, since he was a Illinois State Senator at the time.

Obamatruth.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. yeah.. another Danzo pop up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danzo Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I See That Nothing's Changed
Your responses to my posts are just as devoid of substance as they always were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC