Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vanity Fair has New Evidence Bush Pushed Iraq War Right After 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 03:32 PM
Original message
Vanity Fair has New Evidence Bush Pushed Iraq War Right After 9/11
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26544

New Evidence Bush Pushed Iraq War Right After 9/11

The White House continues to deny that the president immediately began planning an invasion of Iraq in the days after 9/11, calling such charges "revisionist history" (1) and claiming Iraq was "to the side"(2) immediately after the attacks. But new revelations by a former top British official confirm that, immediately after 9/11, President Bush started planning to use the terrorist attacks as a justification for war in Iraq, despite having no proof that Iraq had any connection to Al Qaeda or 9/11. (3)

According to a report in the new edition of Vanity Fair, former British Ambassador to the United States Christopher Meyer said that President Bush made clear at a dinner (4) with Prime Minister Tony Blair nine days after the 9/11 attacks that he wanted to confront Iraq. The assertion is corroborated by the Washington Post, which reported that President Bush personally signed a two-and-a-half page directive on September 17th, 2001 ordering the Pentagon to begin drawing up Iraq invasion plans. (5) The assertion is also corroborated by CBS News, which reported on September 4, 2002 that, five hours after the 9/11 attacks, "Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq."(6) The account by the former British Ambassador confirms similar accounts by former Bush counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke and former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill.

The result of President Bush's preoccupation with Iraq has been dramatic: the diversion of critical resources to Iraq and away from the hunt for Osama bin Laden/Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. As reported by USA Today, "In 2002, troops from the 5th Special Forces Group who specialize in the Middle East were pulled out of the hunt for Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan to prepare for their next assignment: Iraq." (7) Similarly, Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) reported that, in February 2002, a senior military commander told him, "We are moving military and intelligence personnel and resources out of Afghanistan to get ready for a future war in Iraq." (8) That has left many dangerous terrorists still at large, and the UN now reporting that the country is "in danger of reverting to a terrorist breeding ground." (9)

Read More about Bush Administration Distortion at Misleader.org > http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26544


Sources:

1. White House Press Briefing, 3/23/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26545.

2. "Neither Silent Nor a Public Witness," Washington Post, 3/26/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26546.

3. " Doubts cast on efforts to link Saddam, al-Qaida," Knight-Ridder, 3/2/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26547

4. "Report Details Bush-Blair Meeting on Iraq," Associated Press, 4/4/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26548

5. "U.S. Decision On Iraq Has Puzzling Past," Washington Post, 1/12/03, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26549

6. "Plans For Iraq Attack Began On 9/11," CBS News, 9/4/02, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26550

7. Shifts from bin Laden hunt evoke questions," USA Today, 3/28/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26551

8. Senator Bob Graham Remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations," Council on Foreign Relations, 3/26/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26552

9. "UN warns on Aghanistan reverting to terrorism ," Financial Times, 3/28/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=26553
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. the "new Pearl Harbor"
they got their wish :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC