Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recent Super Delegate History is very troubling for Clinton Camp

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:30 PM
Original message
Recent Super Delegate History is very troubling for Clinton Camp
There is no way you can look at this objectively and not be worried for the longevity of the Clinton Campaign. Obama has had new SD endorsements since Ohio and Texas and Clinton has not budged in three weeks.

Date Clinton Obama Uncommited Difference
2/15/2008 242 162 392 81
2/20/2008 246 165 384 81
2/21/2008 246 170 380 77
2/22/2008 246 176 374 71
2/23/2008 245 177 374 69
2/24/2008 245 177 374 69
2/25/2008 245 181 370 65
2/26/2008 245 181 370 65
2/27/2008 245 186 365 60
2/28/2008 244 188 364 57
2/29/2008 243 193 360 51
3/1/2008 243 193 360 51
3/2/2008 243 194 359 50
3/3/2008 243 195 358 49
3/4/2008 243 197 356 47
3/5/2008 243 200 353 44
3/6/2008 243 201 351 42


From politico.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The irony is that she did this to herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no way Hillary will net any majority of super delegates should this go to Convention
no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. And you forgot to mention- she's LOST super delegates who've either defected to Obama or
gone back to uncommitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2_CentsWorth Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Math on the Democratic Side tells an interesting story...
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 02:36 PM by 2_CentsWorth
The arithmetic must include an essential part of the equation:
Neither Obama nor Clinton can secure through the primaries and caucuses the 2,025 delegates necessary to win at the Denver convention without the votes of the superdelegates.


Add up all the states he has won in his drive to become the nominee, including all of those small and deeply "red" Republican states and --
so far Obama has won in places representing 193 of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency.
so far Clinton's has won in places representing 263 of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency.


So how have the candidates fared in states that are crucial building blocks of a Democratic general election strategy?
Obama = 51 electoral votes:
from his home state of Illinois, plus Wisconsin, Washington and Minnesota.
Clinton = 118 electoral votes:
from her home state of New York, as well as California, New Jersey and Michigan.


The problem Obama faced in Ohio was --
Obama won only five of the state's 88 counties, an inauspicious foundation for a general election campaign.
Clinton won among Catholic voters, 63 percent-36 percent, according to exit polls. And Clinton beat him among voters in every income category and bested him by 14 points among those making less than $50,000 annually.


Obama, the leading candidate, still hasn't shown he has appeal in a large battleground state that will be pivotal in the fall. In this sense, Pennsylvania is where Obama's back is up against the wall.

goto--->
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/tough_math_on_the_democratic_s.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. ludicrous because there is little comparison to Clinton winning Democratic strongholds
big fucking deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Is your argument
That Obama will not win NY, MA, NJ, CA over McCain?

That's sort of silly. Well it's beyond sort of silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. SDs don't like party destroying scorched earth tactics?
Who'd a thunk it? :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Perky, numbers no longer matter to the Clintons. They're hell bent to drag their loss out til summer
Worse than Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. I think the pressue to get out after PA will be huge
Even if wins tha state she will only get 15 or so delegate and will still be down by 100 in pledged delagtes and likely surpassed in Super Delegates.


The 12 event losing streak killed her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nastiness deserves no reward really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. spelling it out- Obama has netted 39 Delegates without losing any. Clinton lost
super delegates and ultimately only gained 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does the Titanic mean anything to anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wouldn't you hate to be John Lewis Wednesday?
He threw Hillary under the bus to join "certain victory" with the "inevitable, unstoppable Obama juggernaut."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. His District went 80% for Obama
Hard to go against your consuituency when it is that lopsided,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Why? He's still on the side of angels.... he's still with the Democratic nominee...
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Serious question here....how "firm" are those superdelegates?
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 02:42 PM by antigop
Any chance they could/would switch? Not that I would want them to at this point, but is there a possibility, and if so, how possible?

TIA.

<edit to add> And what type of arm-twisting (if any) could be done to get them to switch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Politically I suspect it is very hard to once you do a press release and all
So unless you candidate does something really disgusting you stick with them as long as they are viable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Thanks, Perky. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm writing local Superdelegates
I'm urging Clinton superd's to switch to Obama because Clinton's tactics have crossed the line and she is now damaging the party's chances to regain the White House. Obama will have a difficult-enough time overcoming the Republican smear machine without Hillary giving them a head start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. They denied the '50 SD bloc' for a reason.
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 02:46 PM by americanstranger
I think the Obama campaign was planning on dropping all 50 superdelegates at once, but they pulled back in favor of a different strategy.

I think they actually do have those 50 DSs - but they're going to release them in onesies and twosies between now and the PA primary.

Watch for a talking point from the Obama campaign in the run-up to PA where they talk about the 'slow, steady trickle of superdelegates away from Clinton,' or some such.

If they would have dropped all 50 as a bloc, it would have been a story for a day. If thy roll them out one or two a day between now and PA, they'll have a potent talking point/cudgel to hammer Clinton with.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yep controlling the news cycle is what is most important for the next few week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. $55 million in donations is a record - he has it for today.
That and Dean's proposals on FL and MI are the top stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. hmmm...interesting.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. I think it'll be a combination of the 2 strategies
Remember there's a caucus in Wyoming Saturday - and Obama is favored to win as his caucus ground game is so much better. 12 delegates at stake.

Then a primary in Mississippi on Tuesday, which he's favored to win because of demographics. 33 delegates at stake.

Accelerating momentum...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton is playing hardball, she wants to be president
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 02:43 PM by gasperc
she doesn't care if it'll crack up the party, she'll scare the hell out of us in November to fall in line against McCain, lest we end up with a generational conservative supreme court.

The superdelegates are going to decide this. Clinton is sowing the seeds of doubt, giving the supers heartburn about "taking a chance" on the young, black upstart. Hillary will push the voter's very, very hard on this in PA. People powered by damn, popular sentiment be damned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. MSNBC just reported that Obama has between 210 & 214 SDs
I saw it on a graphic. He's doing better than 201 now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Most of MSM say the number is higher
But I like the way Politico is tracking them on their website.

I suspect the MSNBC graphic has Hillaru higher than 240 as well..


http://www.politico.com/superdelegates/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. You're right
They have her at 254.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC