Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bullets and the ballot box

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 06:10 AM
Original message
Bullets and the ballot box
Philip James, former senior Democratic party strategist seems here to be arguing that the Dems should not be pushing too much on Iraq. Make of this what you will.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/comment/story/0,14259,1183887,00.html

Is this war in Iraq worth the loss of American lives, now topping 600? Was America taken to war on a pretext? If this was a fake war, why are real Americans dying? These are the questions John Kerry has to frame if he is to unseat this president.

It won't be easy. While the Falluja video ranks alongside the images of US servicemen dragged through the streets in Mogadishu, the reaction of Americans to it is likely to be quite different.

Somalia was supposed to be a peacekeeping mission. When it went bad, no one could explain why Americans were there in the first place. Iraq is a different story. Americans were well prepared for this war. And even after 10 days of Richard Clarke-generated headlines, the latest polls - taken before the latest Falluja attacks - show a majority of Americans supporting the war.

The Falluja killings are a seminal moment in the public perception of the Iraq conflict, but the Democrats cannot expect that the event will favour their case. The images are as likely to galvanise support among those who have supported the war so far. The Bush White House will try to use the atrocity as a rallying point to make its case: that it's the US against the crazies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting, yet it
overlooks the simple formula of the "three groups": (1) those who always vote for you (example: anti-war, pro-Kerry); (2) those who always vote against you(pro-war, pro-bush); and (3) the undecided who will decide every close election. We can safely determine how both groups 1 & 2 feel about the terrible images of the war from this week. So it's group 3 that we need to appeal to. Do they have teen-aged sons? Because a vote for bush increases the chances that their sons will be spending time in the Middle East, to prop up the bush "peace" plan. Think of those images, and look at your sons, nephews, and the boys on your high school sports teams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC