Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago 1968 - Denver 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:16 AM
Original message
Chicago 1968 - Denver 2008
Worth repeating.........


Chicago 1968 - Denver 2008

http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/opedne_stephen__080208_chicago_1968___denve.htm

by Stephen Pizzo Page 1 of 3 page(s)

On August 25, Democrats will gather in Denver for their nominating convention. Ironically it comes precisely 40 years since the party opened it's 1968 convention in Chicago. The 1968 convention was the most significant in my lifetime - until now.

The Democratic Party and the nation paid a horrible price for what transpired at that convention, a price we may be about to pay again.

The Democratic convention this August faces many of the same issues as Democrats face in 1968. Change vs. same-old, same-old. Machine politics vs. people politics. The will of the people vs. the will of party insiders. They are all in play again.

I only mention this because the players are already setting up their plays for the August show down in Denver. Hillary Clinton has made it clear that, if Obama wins enough delegates to match her, she and her party surrogates will demand that delegates from Florida and Michigan be seated, even though she had agreed with the party's decision months ago to ban them if they moved their primaries up. They did anyway and their delegates were decertified. Now that she won Florida she wants to change the rules.

If that fight breaks out on the convention floor this August, get ready for trouble. What kind of trouble? Big trouble. That's what kind of trouble.

A brief history is required. Bear with me. Because, it's that important.

Flash Back:

Choosing a Presidential nominee in 1968 was particularly difficult...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. We'd be a far better country now if Humphrey had won in 1968
And that's the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Agree, But...
After the assassination of Bobby Kennedy, and the police riots (read: Daley Machine) of the 68 Convention, a WHOLE LOT of young enthusiastic supporters\voters said "Fuck This" and stayed home for the GE.

I just hope that this time around, the wounds delivered in the primary, are not too deep for unity in the fall.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Humphrey was pro war. That's why he lost.
If Clinton wins the nomination, she would be wise to remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. The mainstream Dems stayed home too or voted for Nixon. That
'68 convention was a nasty piece of work. It turned off a lot of voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I sincerely hope it doesn't come to this.
But if the superdelegates steal the nomination, Grant Park may look like a sunday school picnic in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. If it comes down to superdelegates
then half the Democrats will see it as stealing. No matter the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ain't gonna happen.
The '60s generation wanted to change the system not just shuffle the bosses in the Democratic Party. There's nothing like that going on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC