Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MYDD Prediction: Clinton will win CA by only 25-30 delegates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:34 PM
Original message
MYDD Prediction: Clinton will win CA by only 25-30 delegates
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/2/212343/0037

It's a very interesting system that California uses, which doesn't give many advantages to the front-runner.



California will send 441 delegates to the Democratic National Convention. 370 will be determined by the primary election on Tuesday, of which 241 will be determined at the Congressional District Level. As we saw in Nevada, whether a district has an even or odd number of delegates will count a lot towards whether the popular vote winner there actually will get a delegate advantage.

There are 53 Congressional Districts in California. 21 will send an odd number of delegates to the national convention - 2 CDs with 3 delegates and 19 with 5. Any delegate who carries any of these CDs will automatically get a 1-delegate advantage. However, it will be extremely difficult for either candidate to win by a sufficiently large amount to gain a 3-delegate advantage over the other.

The other 32 congressional districts all have an even number of delegates. Unless whoever wins that district does so by a near landslide, whoever wins the district will not win an advantage in the number of delegates. Of these 32 districts, six will send 6 delegates to the national convention and the rest will send 4.


.....

So in summary, the congressional-district delegate breakdown should favor Hillary, but not overwhelmingly; about +15 for the 241 delegates at stake. She'll also win a majority of the statewide at-large delegates to go about +25 or +30 for the state as a whole.

On the webpage, they have a breakdown of the Congressional Districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. This proportional delegate stuff is kind of a mess
I mean, I like it because it benefits Obama, but I don't think we should use it again in '12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed
Maybe we should go to winner take all like the Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I respectfully disagree - winner take does not seem fair to me
I like that the pulse of a state is really taken by it.

Usually it doesn't matter, the nom is sewn up by Super Tuesday.

I love that this is such a compelling primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. This state might not be as big a coup for Hillary as originally thought.
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 10:39 PM by NJSecularist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. May not be that large given a 15% Obama result splits delegates despite Hillary 85%
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 10:48 PM by papau
in any given congressional district - if I understand the rules correctly.

California with 53 congressional districts, three delegates in each, also gives the winner of the statewide vote an additional bonus of 11 delegates. A Democratic candidate who gains 15 percent of the popular vote in a congressional district generally is guaranteed at least one delegate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is that referring to the at-large delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. the allocation in each congressional district in CA of 3 delagates is always 2 to 1
the 11 at large go to the winner of the statewide popular vote as I understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I see. Anyways, I found out how the 129 at-large delegates are allocated
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 11:11 PM by NJSecularist
up to 51.0 65-64
51.1-51.2 66-63
51.3-52.4 67-62
52.4-53.1 68-61
53.1-53.7 69-60
53.8-54.9 70-59
55.0-55.2 71-58
55.3-56.1 72-57
56.2-57.2 73-56
57.3-57.4 74-55
57.5-58.6 75-54

The first column is how much % of the popular vote the winner gets, the second column is how many at-large delegates the winner and the loser get.

So even if Hillary defeats Obama by a double digit margin, she still won't gain much of a delegate difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. Proportional awards are making both of our candidates stronger
by making them test their messages, strategies, adjust and also giving voters more exposure to them before the deal is sealed.

i am relieved that this process is taking its time. i was very concerned that it would all be decided in Iowa because I'd barely seen Obama by then and in fact since then by seeing so much of him, I ended up switching to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC