Will Obama have to testify at the Rezko trial??

[1corona4u]

Just wondering....

[bidenista]

1. "i did not have (many) financial relations with that gentleman". nt

[SteppingRazor]

2. No. The trial has to do with Rezko's position on a state board.

If any politician has to testify, it'll be Gov. Blagojevich.

[1corona4u]

4. Well, what about the question with the

Nadhmi Auchi part? Rezko had asked unidentified "Illinois government officials" to help him get clearance for a visa for Nadhmi Auchi. What if one of the officials turns out to be Obama? I'm sure he would then, right?

[SteppingRazor]

6. Again, that refers to state officials. The whole trial settles on state government. n/t

[cali]

3. no. I realize that news is disappointing to you, but tough

there is no suggestion that he will have to do so. No subpoena. No having to testify. Now, how much play will the Giustra story get? I'm betting quite a bit as it's on the front page of the most influential paper in the country today.

[1corona4u]

5. I guess we'll see....

[KittyWampus]

7. why would he? It's too many degrees of seperation from what actually happened.

[1corona4u]

8. Not if he, at that time..

was one of the 'unidentified state officials'...

[Bitwit1234]

9. But but how about his financial relationship with the Iraqi

crook who was Saddam's buddy.