Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards at 25% ?? According to SC web page?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:35 PM
Original message
Edwards at 25% ?? According to SC web page?
Young Turks still have him at 20%. They are watching the CNN page. Wouldn't the SC page be more accurate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are WAY behind in updating. Look at total voters compared to MSM numbers
They are at like 1-2% which is insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. sorry here is the link:
http://www.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/scsec/scsec-demprisw-012608.pl

Looks like it is Edwards 22% now...

I can't find where it says what vote percentage is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. 67% of precincts give him 19%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Politico : 60.46% reporting he has 18.7 %
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. also states the results are unnofficial. I got excited at first as well.
They look quite a bit behind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So we have to go by CNN? Why are they better informed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not saying they are.
Keep hope alive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Helplessly Hoping... as usual. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC