Hey Hillary. I will see your Rezko and raise you a Peter Paul,

[wndycty]

-snip-
The federal government's criminal case is largely built around the claims of Peter Paul, an ex-convict who turned on the Clintons after producing a lavish Hollywood fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton in 2000. Specifically, he claims that Mrs. Clinton's campaign staff did not disclose that he had spent nearly $2 million on the event, money that should have been reported as a contribution to Mrs. Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign.

Mr. Paul said he organized and served as a co-host for the affair - a star-studded gala that charged $1,000 a person - to win former President Bill Clinton's support for Stan Lee Media, an Internet venture he had started with Mr. Lee, the co-creator of Spider-Man.

"An ex-president is the best rainmaker you can get," Mr. Paul said in a recent telephone interview from his apartment in North Carolina, where he is free on bail while awaiting sentencing in an unrelated criminal case.

But Mr. Paul says the Clintons and their associates turned their backs on him after The Washington Post disclosed his criminal past, which includes his guilty plea in 1979 to cocaine possession and an attempt to defraud the government of Fidel Castro out of millions of dollars.
-snip-

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/09/nyregion/09clinton.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Let the record show Rezko is under indictment while Mr. Paul is actually convicted.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C9kP6wz5l4

[wndycty]

1. Kick for adding the pic

:kick:

[MethuenProgressive]

22. Here's the Under Covered pic of Obama and his Republican mastermind

[rucky]

2. I see your Peter Paul...

and raise you a Mary.

[wndycty]

3. LOL

:kick:

[ChairmanAgnostic]

6. ...

If I had a hammer, I'd use it on peter, paul, and mary.

[Blarch]

4. LOL

The Hillary supporters don't even see this thread.

Reminds me of SGT. Schultz

"I SEE NOTHING"

[wndycty]

9. Of course they don't see it. . .

. . .but its an interesting counter balance to the Obama Rezko thing.

[wndycty]

5. Kick again. . .this time for video

:kick:

[Blarch]

7. This number is pretty large

Specifically, he claims that Mrs. Clinton's campaign staff did not disclose that he had spent nearly $2 million on the event, money that should have been reported as a contribution to Mrs. Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign.

[wndycty]

8. Yup. . ..

Let's kick this, and kick it hard!

[ursi]

10. How about Hillary and Rupert Murdoch!

In the summer of 2005, Richard Johnson, the editor of the New York Post’s feared Page Six column, was having trouble getting a new passport to fly out to a party being hosted by Sean (P. Diddy) Combs in Saint-Tropez.

So he did what any citizen would do: He made a direct appeal to the office of junior New York Senator Hillary Clinton.

“Richard Johnson found the bureaucracy delaying his passport, and he appealed to Clinton’s staff for help, as any constituent would,” said Howard Rubenstein, who is a spokesman for the Post. “And he secured, in a legal and proper way, a passport that he was entitled to.

“There were no favors,” Mr. Rubenstein added.

(“While we’re very proud of our constituent services, we don’t comment on individual cases,” said Philippe Reines, a spokesman for Senator Clinton.)

The question of favors has been a big one lately at Page Six. Last week, the column pre-empted one of its former employees, Jared Paul Stern, in his efforts to make public a series of accusations about ethical lapses among the column’s staff, by printing an item themselves outlining all of the accusations.

more...

http://www.observer.com/2007/did-page-six-kill-numerous-items-clintons

[wndycty]

11. So let me get this straight she helps the guy who writes Page Six. . .

. . .hmmmm and let me guess when someone wants to make up shit about what played at Obama's victory party Page Six runs it. HMMMMMMMMMMMM

[1corona4u]

12. I'm familiar with the story...

and know the details. He's a con man. Otherwise, why would he have bothered to video tape a phone conversation with Hillary....he was planning to set them up. Simple as that.

They also found nothing to charge Hillary for. Go look for that info. It's out there.

[wndycty]

15. That is the not the question, the Clinton's are playing the guilt by association game. . .

. . .with Rezko. Obama has not been accused of any wrong doing either. The simple question is did Peter Paul host a fund raiser for Hillary?

By the guilt by association standards the Clintons are using this is fair game.

[1corona4u]

23. No, the question IS

did Paul set up the Clintons, and I say he did. Period. I'm looking at it objectively, you're not.

Did Rezko set up Obama? I don't think so....

[SIMPLYB1980]

13. Some reading for you.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/crooked_claims_about_clinton.html

[angie_love]

14. bahahha

kick esp the pic of hillz and rupert. bahahaha

[wndycty]

16. Answer a simple yes or no question. . .did he host a fundraiser for Hillary

Its yes/no.

[wndycty]

17. I'm still waiting for the answer. . .

:shrug:

[SIMPLYB1980]

18. Have a pony.

[wndycty]

20. Thanks for the pony, its obvious why you won't answer the question

:kick:

[EFerrari]

21. That link says the video has problems, not that the incident

didn't happen.

[wndycty]

25. Exactly . . .

. . .I don't think there is a dispute about whether or not he hosted a fund raiser for Hillary. Which is all that is necessary to to show that this whole guilt by association thing they are using for Rezko can cut both ways.

[EFerrari]

27. The Clintons should know better than to go down this road.

I thought only Bill was into self sabotage but now she's doing it, too.

[Barack_America]

26. That's too intellectually complicated...

They don't understand complicated logic.

[sandnsea]

19. Hsu, Trie, Chung, Paul

Burkle, Chatwal... the Clintons have a truck load and talk about getting a pass from the media.

[Barack_America]

24. Rich and Gupta.

Shit. We're going to have to come up with mnemonic to remember all these names. They're really piling up!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/22/feds-investigating-big-cl_n_73835.html

[sandnsea]

29. Myron Cherry

Here's another one that was mentioned in the Rezco charges.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4195148

I really think when the Republicans start letting loose with all this, the country is just going to get nauseated and say not again.

[joeybee12]

28. So, holding a fundraiser is WORSE than a 17-year relationship

with a guy??

And the Clintons turned their backs on him when they discovered his shady dealings?

Sounds like they did the right thing, but leave it to the porr confused people wandering around in BarakWorld to make the nright thing seem like the wrong thing.

[Pachamama]

30. This is why I don't want the Clinton's back in the White House! I don't want to spend the next

friggin' 4-8 years with scandals, investigations and wondering where the "first man" and interns are....

Ugh...its like living in a bad nightmare all over again.... :puke: