Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Rules: Will Allow the At-Large Precincts on the Las Vegas Strip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:18 PM
Original message
Judge Rules: Will Allow the At-Large Precincts on the Las Vegas Strip
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:36 PM by flpoljunkie
Just heard on MSNBC.


A view of the marquee sign in front of the Harrah's Las Vegas casino on the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada in this December 12, 2007 file photo. (Las Vegas Sun/Steve Marcus/Files - UNITED STATES/Reuters)

From the Las Vegas Sun:

Judge: At-large precincts are OK

By David McGrath Schwartz · January 17, 2008 · 11:12 AM

Just minutes ago, District Court Judge James Mahan rejected the lawsuit that contested the nine at-large Strip caucus sites.

He cited case law that “recognizes the parties have the right to determine how to apportion delegates.”

Attorney Mark Ferrario for the state teachers’ union and five party activists who brought the lawsuit said he didn’t know whether they would appeal, but “probably not.”

http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/early-line/2008/jan/17/judge-at-large-precincts-are-ok/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Beware of ANYONE trying to suppress the vote. nt
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Once again, this is a caucus, not a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. once again, beware of attempted voter suppression -- it is so very GOP-esque
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. AK, voter suppression is damn GOP-esque! Rovarian even!!!
:blush: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. it reeks 'o Rove
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
37. that is completely irrelevant
Hillary Clinton is suing state after state to try to suppress her opponents' vote. That's a fact. And that holds true for the election process, caucus or primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. As I've always said, I defer to a NV courts knowledge of NV election law
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is bad for Clinton
right? I'd like some more info on this if anyone wants to take the time to stop talking about Reagan for 1 minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. This is good for democracy--suppressing the vote by denying access to casino workers is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. YESSSSSSS!!!
Voter suppression lost in Iowa and it loses in Nevada :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OP edited to add link from Las Vegas Sun.
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:21 PM by flpoljunkie
http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/early-line/2008/jan/17/judge-at-large-precincts-are-ok/

Judge: At-large precincts are OK

By David McGrath Schwartz · January 17, 2008 · 11:12 AM

Just minutes ago, District Court Judge James Mahan rejected the lawsuit that contested the nine at-large Strip caucus sites.

He cited case law that “recognizes the parties have the right to determine how to apportion delegates.”

Attorney Mark Ferrario for the state teachers’ union and five party activists who brought the lawsuit said he didn’t know whether they would appeal, but “probably not.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goku2008 Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. OBAMA!
OBAMA! OBAMA OBAMA! OBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Is Obama bussing casino voters into the at-large caucuses?
:P You KNOW I'm kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Heh
GOTV :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is good for Las Vegas and Nevada. This is good for democracy. n/t
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:23 PM by Big Blue Marble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:24 PM
Original message
Tell Reply #5 that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thank God......
But the fact that this was even tried is what is sick.

The results speak to it....since a judge said HELL NO!

Good! :)

Democracy came through. Political desperation lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. It would have been awfully sleazy (and in the spotlight) to rule otherwise
not that such provides any confidence in the courts. they can be pretty amazing when they "have to" be -- like Bush v Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Removing caucus sites at the last minute is disenfranchisement
Anyone who supported this bullshit should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. THANK YOU!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gobama!!! nt
This is great for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Filing a suit like that and losing is pretty embarrassing
what a bunch of idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. at-large casino caucus sites...
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:33 PM by publicatlarge
The at-large casino caucus sites must be skewed to favor Obama as his supporters are cheered by this decision. Is this a level playing field? Is it important to have a level playing field in a democracy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adapa Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. I worry about the level playing field ---equatity amoung voters
To my mind it's not so much about Obama support as it's about equality among the caucuses goers.

It would suck if a group of voters got more weight then another simply because of where they caucused. Think how that could be turned against a group in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. The voters are skewed toward Obama.
If you have to discourage participation in order to win an election (a common strategy) it hurts democracy in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. f course they did
This was a really bad move from the Clinton camp. It is not playing well in the papers here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't like the idea of caucus voting
because apparently it requires a public declaration of one's political preference, which is then subject to possible coercion.

But it's certainly better to allow this caucus than the alternative, which would prevent these workers from voting at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adapa Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. It does seem as tho NV should look into this after the primarys
1 person = 1 vote or a set percentage of a delegate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Now watch the DLC appeal this.
Worked for MSPOS, didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. That's a losing strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. DLC has no say
The teacher's union can appeal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe Bill will be the Clinton to play *Evita* like HRC did so well in NH?
Heaven knows he's angry and "loaded for bear." How dare us "little people" deny the desires of The Clintonian DLC's Royal Family. :crazy: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. Not the least bit surprising.
That lawsuit was bullshit. Thanks for posting though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Spladow.
Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adapa Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm all for people voting as long as all votes are equal
I'm all for 1 person = 1 vote or a percentage of a delegate.

According to the Plaintiffs,
The amount of delegates are to be counted differently depending on where the voter is caucusing.

If a voter is caucusing at a normal caucus the math is
1 delegate for every 50 voters in the district

At-large precincts are treated as counties in and of their own, meaning that depending on attendance, one delegate could be assigned for every five participants.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/13794012.html

Political rationals are beyond the scope of my post, I'm just looking at the math.

As I said, I'm all for people voting as long as all votes are equal

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Good for the voters and Good for the party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. Bill Clinton made an ass out of himself yesterday defending this wicked lawsuit.
Everyone in Nevada saw Bill Clinton's anger yesterday when the reporter busted him for his stealthy attempt to suppress voter turnout in Nevada.

That will cost Hillary any chance of winning now on Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC