|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:10 AM Original message |
Is there political value in Candidate A or Candidate B asking someone to be their VP Now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. No--it exposes the VP pick to scrutiny and attacks WAY too early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. But haven't some already obvious choices been vertted already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yes, I'm sure they have been-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. This is a unique election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
3. Only if there's something major causing the candidate to loose ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. You don't think that would allow a candidate to Gain new ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. VP selections before one is the nominee (at least assured of being) would be not be received well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Because of the perceived arrogance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It is unique. I just think it would be a foolish manevuer tactically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC