|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:04 AM Original message |
Edwards Says Nafta Is Important, but in Need of Change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. Isn't that Kerry's position on NAFTA? Why, I believe it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. yup, sounds familiar doesn't it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. So perhaps he would have voted for it after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. If it didn't protect jobs/environment, he wouldn't have voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Don't spin this, AP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. You're spinning "a tick away." Dan Schorr said on NPR that the DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Maybe those mill workers whose jobs have gone to CHINA would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 12:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. China is CHEATING on that deal. Maybe if they weren't cheating, we could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I think also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. now he sounds just like the rest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
4. Sorry, John. You just lost me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
6. Excellent read. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Becuase he wants to protect jobs and the envirnoment, and they don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Maybe Edwards Saw Protectionist Rhetoric Didn't Help Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. He has always been FOR trade, and against the exploitation of labor. They |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
7. No kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. IOW, he'll "nibble around the edges"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Kerry says he'll do those things, but when those things aren't in the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. to some extent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Cherry picking? The problem with China trade is that China is breaking the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:43 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I wouldn't call the China issue cherry picking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. China is cheating on that agreement. The agreement would have prevented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. mostly I think in terms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. textiles is the one I read about, but also violating intellectual property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. What was Edwards' vote on fast track, AP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:44 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Clinton wanted fast track. As I said in my other post, I'm not sure what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Reread my post and you'll get my point, AP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:52 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Tell us more about fast track. In my view, it's going to be a powerful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 12:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. It's a contentious issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. What? No comments on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
14. TweedleDee has better rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
21. Edwards and Kerry need to talk to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. It is to suffer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
34. "... *slow* the loss of jobs to other countries ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Streetdoc270 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
35. please be nice to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. NAFTA was bad then too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. It wasn't good when Clinton was in office. It was bad then, bad now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. That's when I dumped the Dems too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Did Kerry back MFN status for China? Did Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
37. NAFTA can't be changed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:30 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I take it back...NAFTA can be ammended ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. And 'all parties' means the corporate-appointed stooges that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. Kucinich is the only one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC