|
Surprise. Not It's never been medical or financial. On the contrary, public not for profit insurance would lift a huge burden of enterprises throughout America.
It's political, and not a lack of political will. The 'universal health care' offered by Clinton, Edwards and Obama, are if you like, something of a bridge to public insurance. Not for profit insurance similar to the Congressional scheme is offered at subsidized rates. If the public scheme is run well, there should be an exodus from the private funds. As well as taking the worst cases off their hands, that competition may well exert downward pressure on private insurance premiums. Yes, people can choose private health insurance if they want to: they have that choice.
In the general election, if a candidate goes gung ho single payer and banning private insurance, the literal single payer, (Kucinich's position, not Canada's), he or she will be up against a good proportion of $15 billion in funds the Insurance Industry and it's supplicants have marked for public "education". Forget advertising for drugs, think one in five hit ads: Patients losing limbs and lives because they are 'waiting' in line; Critical drugs refused or unavailable; and every feared medical condition under the sun blamed on losing private insurance. Big Sister is killing your health. Never mind how arch the falsehood, it is suicide. It's pure suicide.
|