Huckabee: Scott McClellan's allegations (re: plamegate) "not made under oath"

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

...speaking on Hardball, when confronted with Scott McClellans statement that Bush and Cheney were personally involved in getting him to lie to the press about Rove and Libby.

Ummm... is there some reason to think McClellan's statements would be more reliable if he was under oath? (And don't you suppose he went over this stuff with the Grand Jury under Oath? Did McClellan testify? I know Ari Fleisher did.)

Did any aspect of the Scooter Libby perjury conviction sink in with these clowns? (rhetorical question, I guess)

[K Gardner]

1. ROFL.. like "under oath" means ANYTHING to these thugs n/t

[grasswire]

2. alrighty, then.....get him under oath now.

There's a remedy, Huckabee.

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

3. Just added on edit:

I didn't remember right away that of course McClellan must have testified to the Grand Jury... so he's probably said all this stuff under oath.

But his new BOOK wasn't written under oath... okay.

[Supersedeas]

4. straight talking conservatives relying on legalisms....odd?

[AX10]

5. Does such a breed exist?

[Bitwit1234]

6. Since they are required

to take the Oath of Office to Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States, you know damn well UNDER OATH means absolutely nothing to a republican.

[BootinUp]

7. Amazing, mindblowing even. nt