Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Clinton campaign too scripted? (new wrinkle on "plants": questions generated by other campaigns)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:02 PM
Original message
Is Clinton campaign too scripted? (new wrinkle on "plants": questions generated by other campaigns)
A cautionary note on the "plant" issue: I think we shouldn't be naive about this kind of thing in any campaign from any candidate in either party. Unless politics has changed since I've worked in campaigns, it's often not a game played on the honorable level we would like. And a lot goes on without the candidate's knowledge.

LAT: Is Clinton campaign too scripted?
A planted question at an Iowa event brings the issue to the front burner.
By Peter Nicholas, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
November 14, 2007

....No presidential campaign likes surprises, but Clinton's operation may be unmatched in its discipline. The current front-runner for the Democratic nomination hews to her message and avoids messy campaign leaks and personnel drama. Still, by planting questions at what are supposed to be unscripted question-and-answer sessions with Iowa voters, Clinton may have fed perceptions that her campaign is too programmed for its own good, Democratic strategists said. The episode followed a Democratic debate in Philadelphia where Clinton was widely faulted for offering ambiguous and perhaps overly calculated answers on Iraq, immigration and Social Security.

"It's a small thing that could be a metaphor for a bigger concern for people -- over-management and too much caution," said Robert M. Shrum, a senior advisor to the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, Sen. John F. Kerry....

***

Spontaneous exchanges with voters are a ritual in Iowa and New Hampshire, small states that pose the first tests for presidential candidates. Candidates are expected to take part in free-wheeling discussions about whatever may be on the voters' minds. To the extent that a candidate short-circuits that process by stacking the audience with plants, it runs afoul of important political customs, political strategists said....

Spontaneous questions from the audience can be worrisome for Clinton's campaign, which is bent on minimizing risks. She has had a few brushes with tough questions, some of which made unwelcome news. In Iowa last month, Clinton sparred with a man about her vote for a resolution proclaiming the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. He said he feared that the resolution would encourage Bush to take military action. Clinton told him that "somebody obviously sent to you" a mistaken view of her position. The man bristled and said he had done "my own research."

Various campaigns complain that a certain kind of dirty trick routinely plays out on the trail -- having a rival's supporters crash their town hall event and pose embarrassing questions. Asked if this happens at former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's events -- dubbed "Ask Mitt Anything" -- Kevin Madden, a spokesman for the GOP candidate, said: "Very much so."

Another variation of this practice is typically seen with call-in radio and TV shows, said Chris Lehane, who was a spokesman for Al Gore's unsuccessful campaign in 2000 and is now supporting Clinton. "There are very few phone calls that are genuinely from uninterested parties," he said. "They're generated from campaigns."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-hillary14nov14,1,4488978.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&ctrack=1&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Considering the attack of the day is about a single stray word...
I'd have to say NO!

She hasn't been given a choice about this. So far she has brilliantly negotiated the minefield she has to walk and talk thru every single day, but it's an awful endurance trial. Why don't we just send all our candidates to Gitmo for a vacation? I'm sure they need the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A very good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was a complaint of the first Bush campaign, IIRC. The media was
very annoyed because the Monkey would never go "off message." He was like a wind-up doll.

I'd say the media is getting lazy. They're recycling from 2000. They need to dig up a DUI on someone, next!!! Maybe a youthful coke habit!

I think Clinton's campaign is well organized. If you aren't scripted to an extent, the thing can go off the rails.

One thing that really pisses off supporters is 'habitually late' candidates. When you have a crowd of people who showed up at five to hear a candidate speak at six thirty, and the individual doesn't show up until eight or nine, well, it dampens enthusiasm and makes the supporters feel as though the candidate is a bit insensitive. "Scripting" -- or adhering tightly to a schedule -- keeps the machine going so that the candidate can make the max number of appearances in a day, AND get a decent amount of rest. The rest is key to keep on going over the long haul, too.

The guy who did "his own research" is amusing. If he actually had, he wouldn't have gotten so ... peeved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You're right. Shrub "stayed on message" -- and won. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phunktified Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Any article quoting Shrum
Is pretty worthless IMO. He has no credibility to offer advise on how presidential campaign should be run. He's what 0 for 3, 0 for 4?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I wondered myself why the reporter went to Shrum for an expert opinion. Welcome to DU, Phunktified!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Who is he working for, this time round? Anyone ??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I believe he is currently unemployed and likely to remain so.
Especially after telling tales outside of school about the Kerry campaign in his memoir.

One thing is definite he will not be working for the Edwards campaign after what he said about him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. On his MTP interview, didn't Obama say unequivocally that his campaign did not plant questions?
I believe the Edwards has also said that. That said, I wonder how Iowans are digesting the Hillary plant reporting
and if it's affecting their caucus leanings? I'd like to see poll results on this question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC