Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New South Carolina Poll -Hillary 47% Obama 33% Edwards-10%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:32 PM
Original message
New South Carolina Poll -Hillary 47% Obama 33% Edwards-10%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe you missed this
down in the last box


Filtering: 2,200 South Carolina adults were interviewed 11/09/07 through 11/11/07. Of them 1,895 were registered to vote. Of the 1,895, a total of 1,483 were identified by SurveyUSA as likely to vote in the South Carolina Presidential Primary. Of them, 201 were disqualified by SurveyUSA because they could not commit to voting "no matter what date the primary is held," and of the remaining 1,282 likely voters, 257 were disqualified by SurveyUSA because they said they had not decided yet which Primary they were going to vote in. The net yield is 577 likely Republican Primary voters and 447 likely Democratic Primary voters. All of these are voters who say they are certain to vote no matter what day the primary is held, and are certain today which one of the two primaries they will vote in. Caveat: Measuring African American turnout in South Carolina is a challenge in any election, but uniquely so in a Primary where an African American is a candidate for President. It is unknowable at this hour how many infrequent black voters, if any, Obama may turnout in a Primary, and, separately, how many infrequent young voters an Obama candidacy may attract in a Primary. These survey results should be evaluated with these caveats in mind.


These darned polls sure can be deceptive, or at least their headlines. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So, like, Obama could have a gazillion more votes?
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 09:46 PM by AtomicKitten
Effin hell yes!

edited for the winking guy ... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Since He's Beating Hillary 52% -39% In That Category I Don't Think It Would Change The Results...
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 09:47 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Why is Edwards only getting ten percent in the state of his birth?

And why is the most "liberal" candidate only getting three percent of the African American vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And The Results Are In Line With The Results Of Aggregate Polling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm just pointing out the flaws of the poll.
It's misleading and deceptive, just like I did in another post on NH, where 48% of the voters have not made a firm decision, and 24% said they could change their mind., yet the headline blares something totally different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They Admit The Numbers Are Problematic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. ok
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Probably because voting based on where someone lived for a few years in their early childhood
isn't a good idea? It's not like he was a senator from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He Was The Senator From The Other Carolina
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yeah, exactly.
And? From what I understand he wasn't very popular in NC either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. We Agree Then...
Gore-Lieberman did better in NC in 00 than Kerry- Edwards in 04...

That's interesting or revealing depending on your perspective...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Actually, Kerry-Edwards seem to have done slightly better
at least comparing the percentages of the vote received: Bush/ Gore 2000 it's 56-43, while Bush/Kerry 2004 it's 56-44. No significant improvement, but a slight improvement, which goes against the general trend between the two elections (Gore generally did slightly better than Kerry did in most states.)

2000 results: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/NC/frameset.exclude.html

2004 results: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NC/P/00/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Sez who? Plenty of folk I know like him fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does SUSA pretend to know the exact turnout for whites?
I don't get it. On what basis does SUSA determine that blacks are more unpredictable than whites when it comes to turnout?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I Guess They Are Covering Their Bases
All you need to do to adjust the numbers is project different turn outs among African Americans....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. I will be honored to give this the fifth rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not surprising.
Whether Clinton or Obama wins SC will depend on IA and NH.

AWFUL number for Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Whatever happens in Iowa, the whole landscape will change afterwards
for good or for ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC