Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Campaign introduces the fact hub

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:23 PM
Original message
Hillary Campaign introduces the fact hub
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 03:23 PM by Herman Munster
Hillary's campaign is proactive in clearing up the media bullshit spin.

http://facts.hillaryhub.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will the fact hub be correcting the outrageous false spin on hillaryis44.com?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That would be welcome. I hate that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why should they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. To demonstrate that they are legit...unlike the henchmen who run the other cesspool...
perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Why not let the candidates that think the information is wrong do it?
I still fail to see why Hillary's campaign should. Are they to do it to all websites and is it only Hillary's campaign that is responsible for this? Sometime people really should think before they post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're right. Hillary should whine about attacks on her while her supporters attack other candidates
You win the Hillary Award for the day for getting on both sides of this issue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Why thank you!
I haven't won anything in awhile!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. They're fact checking hits on Hillary.
The other campaigns are free to do as they wish in terms of rapid response.

Are you implying the campaign is connected to Hillaryis44?

I haven't seen Obama or Edwards websites correct any of the BS on the Hillary Project and other websites like it.

Does that make them connected to them?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Are you implying the campaign is connected to Hillaryis44?
Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. That must be the default position.
Her campaign strikes me as the sort of machine-like operation that gears up to cover all angles, including the spreading nasty smears and propaganda a la hillaryis44 angle. Given the veiled nature of the website's ownership, my money is on a "plausibly deniable relationship" between Hillary's camp and the site. Unless someone can prove otherwise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Or someone can prove the connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. So we should then expect to see Obama and Edwards...
Correcting the lies their supporters tell about Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a great idea! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Like Pete's Kerry Debunker
I didn't click, is this his too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's a good site
much needed... by ANY candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton's LONG history of supporting ethanol?
More like a 'spin hub?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Feel free to prove otherwise.
Or is this just another hit & run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Here's an example of a Clinton flip-flop on ethanol:
Clinton, running for President in 2007: ""Oil companies won't even put ethanol pumps at their gas stations. They need to be required to do that." She went on to promise to introduce legislation requiring ethanol pumps at filling stations.

Clinton in 2002:

Signed a letter that called ethanol mandates a 'new gas tax' and said that "there is no sound public policy reason for mandating the use of ethanol."

Clinton also voted twice against ethanol mandates in 2002.

Clinton in 2003:

Signed another letter, this one stating that ethanol mandates would "drive up the price of gasoline for consumers, will have mixed environmental results, and will do little to lessen our dependence on foreign oil" and going on to add that "smarter, cleaner, and less expensive ways to reformulate gasoline" than ethanol already existed.

Voted four times to allow states to waive out of ethanol mandates and voted once against industry-wide ethanol mandates.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Are you qouting an Obama email?
Or do you have links to this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. We have the links to the facts. This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. gt is usually good about links.
But I think he may be quoting an email Obama sent to supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. And it is a long history. It's printed right on the web page
Not only that, but at the end of that long record (below) she explains the votes gt referred to:

Hillary voted for energy bill that requires ethanol production to grow to at least 36 billion gallons a year by 2022, a sevenfold increase of the amount of ethanol processed last year.

Hillary has supported extending tax incentives for blending ethanol in gasoline. In 2004, Sen. Clinton voted to extend the 51 cent per gallon ethanol blending credit through 2010, and has proposed a further extension to 2012.

Hillary is the sponsor of a 50% tax credit for the installation of ethanol pumps. "I Support comprehensive legislation that would...up the availability of ethanol by providing gas station owners with a 50 percent tax credit for the cost of installing ethanol pumps"

Hillary is the sponsor of legislation to make ethanol more available nationwide by providing loan guarantees for commercial production. "I support comprehensive legislation...that would speed the development of cellulosic ethanol by providing loan guarantees for the first billion gallons of commercial production capacity."

Hillary co-sponsored legislation to dramatically expand renewable energy, including ethanol, by 2025. Senator Clinton cosponsored a concurrent resolution which expresses the sense of Congress that it is the goal of the U.S. that, not later than 1/1/2025, the agricultural, forestry, and working land of the U.S. should provide from renewable resources not less than 25% of total energy consumed in the U.S. and continue to produce safe, abundant, and affordable food, feed and fiber. Grassley sponsored and Harkin was a co-sponsor.

Hillary supported increasing biofuel production on 'a much faster track' to revitalize rural and reduce dependence on foreign oil. "We have an underused resource, American farmland, and rural communities across our country eager to try something new and do their part to help solve our energy problems. Today we have 97 biorefineries located in 19 different states with the capacity to make nearly 4.5 billion gallons of ethanol. Now, over the next 12 to 18 months, we will increase that capacity by 50 percent. And we're seeing it in New York as we're seeing it around the country... We need to be moving on a much faster track."

Hillary co-sponsored of a tax credit for production of flex-fuel vehicles. Clinton co-sponsored a bill that would provide a $150 per vehicle manufacturer tax credit to encourage the production of "flex-fuel" vehicles that are capable of running on 85% ethanol fuel, known as "E85."

Hillary co-sponsored an amendment to create a program to produce ethanol from municipal solid waste. Senator Clinton cosponsored an amendment that directs the Secretary of Energy to establish a program to provide guarantees of loans by private institutions for the construction of facilities for the processing and conversion of municipal solid waste into fuel ethanol and other commercial byproducts.

Previously, there was evidence that mandating ethanol production might negatively impact the economy in New York and some of Hillary's earlier votes on ethanol reflect that. But that is not an excuse for Obama to distort her record and her strong support for ethanol and other biofuels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Gee, all but one or two of those were from 2006-2007.
That's some long history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. self delete wrong place
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 04:41 PM by William769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. What is not "long" about it?
She doesn't claim she's supported it for many years. The website even mentions her initial opposition and explains it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. So, it's possible to have a long history in a very short
time period?

Man, the Clintons never fail to entertain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. yes
which is why you can't say what isn't long about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Links:
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=906

http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg1603.cfm

http://clinton.senate.gov/~clinton/news/2003/2003409B07.html

"Unfortunately, the bill also contains the ethanol mandate and related provisions that Senators Clinton, Schumer, and several of their colleagues vehemently opposed in Congress last year during debate on the Senate Energy Bill. To address the ethanol mandate, Senator Clinton was successful in getting several provisions added to the bill in Committee, including a requirement that the Federal Trade Commission perform an annual analysis of market concentration within the ethanol industry. The Clinton amendment on market concentration was similar to an amendment offered by Congressman Engel in the House Commerce Committee last week. Unfortunately, the Engel amendment failed in Committee."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. The website explains those votes
Ignoring the facts doesn't reflect well. The fact is HRC has supported ethanol many times when it came to a vote. She hasn't always supported it, but she does not hide that fact. It even says so on the website that we're talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do we really need another shameless Hillary-spin site?
Wasn't Hillarywishesshewas44.org enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Its a campaign website for rapid response.
Its a good idea to have the response posted and on record.

You think Obama shouldn't do something similar to counter MSM crappola like the flag pin & the national anthem BS as well as less than truthful attacks from his rivals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. A caveat...
If :scared: she wins the nomination...I'll have the site bookmarked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Tsk. Tsk
Jealousy isn't pretty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. LOL! Edwards would not have combat missions in Iraq, he'd have combat "expiditions."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. That's why he pared down his 5 questions for Hillary to 3.
That one proved most embarrassing.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. bookmarked, this site is going to be busy
Hillary is being attacked by lies and distortions and false twisting of words from both republicans and other democratic candidates (Edwards mostly).

Boy correcting all the lies will keep the fact hub going 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Pretty good
and I hope it gets better response than media matters. If NPR retracted quickly- without yet another falsehood as seems to be customary for snipes- that shows it is working very well.

There is going to be lot of work for this site, that is for sure. No one should be gald that overreaching or untruths help sink a rival. All Dems need to show good political response and this is good for the party as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is why I said, well before I switch to support Hillary,
that she would do better in the general than all of the others when it comes to BS attacks.
Great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. Sounds like the one Bush created to spin himself out of trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC