Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An inconvenient truth; what Al Gore got wrong

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:21 PM
Original message
An inconvenient truth; what Al Gore got wrong
I finally saw an Inconvenient Truth last night. It struck me there was one thing drastically wrong. Before you flame me, the science is impeccable.

Where I have grave concerns is in the prescriptions. Al makes the case, correctly, that we ended slavery by educating more people who will then made the moral choice to end slavery. He seems to be arguing that we can take similar steps that will end global warming. Elect members of to the house who will address the issue of global warming. Then “touchy feely” things like ride a bike or walk when possible are proposed. This is not how the world works. This is not how and why we make our choices. This is not how to end the problems of global warming.

How many people go to work in traffic every day and then proceed to tell you how much they enjoyed the drive? Aren’t you more likely to hear @#$^%@^@^ Traffic!!!. Are the choices we make as voluntary as the logic in “An Inconvenient Truth” would have us believe? Or are most of the travel choices made not due to a love of driving but because it is the most rational logistical choice. I live in the Chicago burbs and venture into the city for concerts or sports events. I seldom travel by train, not because I love to drive, but because train travel requires finding a parking spot at the train station, a train scheduled to travel only every two hours. Train travel for me can add as much as three or four hours to my trip, this is more time then if traffic is a terrible rush hour mess. We drive because political decision have been made that make auto travel the only logical choice.

Massive public funding car makers, highway construction and airlines make energy inefficient travel the most likely way we travel. This has been led not by the will of the public but by the lobbing and campaign donations of the industries that profit.

Al make the point that we are given the false choice between the earth and the gold. Pointing out that without the earth there is no gold. This is not true. We don’t all have much gold at stake. Most of us have only a small portion of “the gold”. Most of the gold is concentrated in very few hands, and those are the people who most heavily affect elections. Money does not bribe or buy the affection of politicians. Money determines who is electable. The more you agree with big money the more like you are to have big money fund your campaign. The more money you have to campaign with the more likely you are to win. If we want to elect men and women who will stand up for the rights of the public the public must fund their campaigns. It’s as simple as that.

The first and most important thing we can do to address global climate change is to publicly fund election. Unless and until we do we will only get weak-kneed feel good solutions rather then the massive change in direction we really need.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I also live outside of Chicago
I do take the train, regularly when I visit my parents. You are correct it takes a bit longer because of the train schedules but it is a choice I made to help with energy concerns. It's all a matter of how much each person wants and is able to contribute.

I would like to see more measures here as they have in Europe. In Sweden I can take a train and bus anywhere, I can bring my bike, stroller or dog on most modes of transport. It makes it an easy and environmentally sound way to travel. As it is now I couldn't take a bus to the next town over and if I rode my bike I would be road kill.

We have a long way to go.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are right, but Gore is a Politician
I have had a similar reaction. On the other hand I think he is trying to get people to change by making change seem like an easy, small step thing. And frankly that is the only way that the vast majority of Americans will go along. Anytime mass transit comes up there are huge debates. Same with increasing insulation standards, etc., etc. Sadly, I fear many people aren't going to do anything until Global change seriously, adversely, affects them personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. my point is the debate is not so much with the American people
as with the vested moneyed interest resisting the change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Education ended slavery?
I don't know about that.

The only massive change that will do anything is a voluntary scale down, and slow down, of life. Anything done on a large scale will only continue, and escalate, the problems we're trying to solve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. yeah ...
education ended slavery? What about that little thing called the civil war? Not that it was all salvery but you get my point?

People go to war about resources: land, water, etc. Global warming will multiply conflict 100x.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your criticism of "Inconvenient Truth" is a very good one. The presentation
of the science is excellent, and easy for all to understand. The CO2 levels and heat of the earth fluctuate up and down, at regular intervals, on a chart that is, say, ten feet long, going back 600,000 years, and ten feet high. The fluctuations over 600,000 years occur along the 2 foot mark. Then, at the way end of the chart--our era of industrialization-- CO2 and heat abruptly zoom up eight feet and then off the chart. It is staggering what we've done.

But it's also amazing what we CAN do, with an educated public and just half way decent leadership. Not even great leadership. I remember the water crisis in California, some decades ago, when we were all asked to cut down on water use. Within weeks, lawns started being converted to native vegetation, swimming pools were drained, and a thousand new widgets hit the market to save water. Crisis averted. All our leaders have to do is ASK, and Americans will cooperate. We love to solve problems. We have a can-do attitude. It is characteristic of us.

Sadly, our Oil King is preoccupied with killing more people in Iraq so Chevron, Exxon-Mobile & brethren can get their oil contracts signed before their puppet government gets fragged.

See: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=3073715&mesg_id=3073715

And the war profiteering corporate news monopolies are doing their best to disinform, propagandize and "Iron Curtain" the American people, about what everybody else in the world already knows: the world's weather is going wacko, and the reason is fossil fuel burning, combined with deforestation.

But word IS getting out, wonder of wonders--thanks to Gore and others--and it's kind of like electronic voting. We are reduced almost to word of mouth--and our new "Committees of Correspondence" (the Internet)--on any serious matter having to do with Corporate Rule.

As for the Corporate Rulers and global warming, first we have to restore transparent elections. Really. We're not going to have half way decent leadership--or great leadership--until we can hold politicians to account once again. So that's step one. With transparent elections, and thus, great leadership, we can convert to non-polluting alternative energy in five years. We can do it. People are already working on solutions, with virtually no leadership and little funding. Five years--and no more wars for oil, and no more pollution. If the US cuts back our whopping 25%, we're on our way to solving it. (China is the other big problem--but again, with great leadership, we can tackle that one, too.) With semi-transparent elections--what the new Democratic Congress seems to be offering--we can make progress and elect some good leaders,

I really think it's a one to one relationship. Transparent elections = you face serious problems with a creative, can-do attitude, and solve them. Non-transparent elections = you make everything worse, drain the country's treasury, demoralize everybody and kill many, in order to profit from the last oil.

Transparent elections result in the best rising--talented, intelligent, altruistic people rise to the top. Non-transparent elections result in stupid, greedy psychotics grabbing power.

So that's my solution, or the essential first step. Democracy. Real elections. And Gore says not one word about it. I guess it's not that obvious to some folks. (You'd think a politician, though, would know who is counting all the votes with secret programming.) And he barely mentions--just touches lightly upon--the real culprits, the oil profiteers. Well, the man doesn't want to get assassinated. And I hardly blame him. The war profiteers and oil profiteers are the dirtbag, murderingest SOBs of all time. They wouldn't hesitate. We do need to remember this, when we criticize good people in public life. They have pressures that we know not of.

Of course what needs to happen is pulling the corporate charters of these oil monsters and other global corporate monopolies, dismantling them and seizing their assets for the public good. Then we get down to business, and design a livable world.

It IS possible, but we have to regain control of our election system.

And WHILE we're working on restoring democracy in the U.S., there are lots of things we can do personally, and in our neighborhoods and communities, to positively affect global warming. I think Gore mentions turning your heat thermostat down just two degrees. And turn off lights and machines. But also, do some research on energy saving machines, on your own house, apartment building or office building and what you can do there, and join, support or organize local green projects. If you can give up meat and/or dairy, that's a big plus. (Cows are the other big polluter.) SUPPORT LOCAL FARMERS' MARKETS--locally grown, organic food. Very important. The amount of oil is takes to haul imported food around is huge. Gore has a test at his web site, where you can add up your energy use and see how you rate next to the average. The idea is if you're contributing a lot of greenhouses gases with one activity, compensate with another. Some states are way ahead of others, and of the Bush Junta of course, on new green energy planning. Find a good project and good people and support them.

One caveat: Yes, the goddamned Corporate Rulers are the biggest problem. But don't get sucked into feeling helpless and powerless. There is a tremendous amount that you can do, in our own life and locally, and in educating people, in supporting good projects, and, last but not least, in helping to restore transparent vote counting and other democracy measures. (For instance, if four million black voters weren't purged from the voting rolls or otherwise prevented from voting, we would have far better leadership than we do!)

The bigger picture; Government can't do it all--and obviously we must think as democrats with a small d, and develop grass roots strength, and not count on elected leaders. However, there is a reason that the Corporate Rulers are assaulting and destroying and undermining national governments worldwide--and have taken over our own. They want that legislative and executive power. They hold it artificially--through stolen elections, coups and lavish lobbying--but it is nevertheless lethal to us and to our planet to have these false powers usurping our rightful place as the sovereigns of this land. And you will find that, in fighting off the Corporate Rulers, other countries--such as most of the South American countries--are emphasizing "the nation" (also regional self-determination and cooperation). But national self-sufficiency, national pride, local culture, the rights of the people who live in a certain place, and the powers of a democratic government to act in the interests of the people who live there. The Corporate Rulers hate these South American countries for this very reason--they are taking their countries back. In some ways, I favor decentralization, but we really do need the power of a sovereign federal government acting in our interests, that can "carry a big stick" when it comes to these corporate entities. It's not a "big government" issue; it's a sovereignty issue. Who has the legal right and the power to bust monopolies and regulate big corporations? This is why they have taken over our government, and this is why we must get our government back. We need that regulatory and statutory power in order to solve global warming quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. We ARE the government, or at least that's how it's supposed to be
Transparent elections are important, but they can only shade an election a small amount or or the lie becomes transparent. In truth is more people knew what was going on the elections wouldn't even be as close as the last one.

Elections are close as they are due to th way we fund elections, and the fact that the media neglects, or perhaps refuses, to inform the public.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gore would be the first person to admit ...
that his book and movie doesn't prescribe a comprehensive solution to the climate crisis.

The main point is to explain to people why the earth is warming and why we should be concerned about it.

It's overcoming that first step and making people see that "Yes - we have a problem".

When you admit you have a problem, then you can start looking for solutions.

I wish Gore's movie had gone further in setting out some solutions and what they would mean in practice.

For me there was not enough about where all the carbon dioxide is coming from and who is making it?

But Gore is a smart politician and he knows you have to take people along with you ... one step at a time.

It is frustrating for those of us who already see ourselves as being several steps ahead of the majority. But we are a small minority (or at least we were two years ago - when the book and movie were being put together).

I still say that Gore is a visionary and he has been proved right on so many issues. Not just the climate crisis but also the invasion of Iraq and the PATRIOT Act, and the abuses of power by the current (P)Resident of the Whitehouse.

In Gore We Trust :)
www.algore.com
www.algore.org
www.draftgore.com
www.draftgore2008.org
www.patriotsforgore.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree with your post Apollo, I also
believe Al's book due this spring "The Assault on Reason" will address some of these other issues.

To the O.P.

I would say Al was speaking to the corporations as well as the people with the gold/earth scales example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. People Are Actually Listening?
I'm not certain by I cite the following evidence.
Last friday I was watching the evening news on GE TV and Brian Williams unleashes this story about the recent bizarrely warm weather in the northeast. They show some government hack who vehemently denied any connection to global warming stating "its el nino, el nino, el nino".
I was a little disgusted but not surprised by this.
What did surprise me is that a few days later (monday?) Williams went back and recovered the same story but this time gave equal time to Someone who laid out the case that global warming was effecting el nino, making it stronger and thus amplifying the effect. Somehow this part was left out of the original coverage.
Something happened over the weekend to effect even GE TV's news coverage ... bordering on an actual retraction? Wheels may be finally turning ... we can hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. I agree
I loved the movie first and foremost and I think his science and predictions are very sound.

I, like you, thought he could have been a helluva lot more realistic and comprehensive about what needs to be done in the future to address this problem and Gore totally over sweetened and over simplified what I thought you made very clear.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC