|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 06:52 PM Original message |
Another Tucker SMACK DOWN when will he learn Al Sharpton.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sharpton lost me when he said he thought OJ didn't do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 07:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. he lost me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jumpoffdaplanet (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 09:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. I know it's not the popular opinion but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. his DNA all over the crime scene kind of sealed it for me (nm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. What sealed it for me was his bloody shoe print in his own car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 09:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. they put a lying ass cop on the stand. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 11:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. one witness did not negate all the evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenbriar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-23-06 12:18 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I watched too...I do not believe he did the crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 12:13 AM Response to Reply #14 |
31. And I looked at his face when he was pronounced "not guilty" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-23-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Yeah there was overwhelming evidence he did it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
34. He didn't say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sharpton was wrong on at least one point-his claim that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 07:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. and since we are "innocent until proven guilty", OJ's "innocent" then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 07:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. OJ is innocent in the eyes of the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Why is it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 08:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Simple logic and analysis and tons of evidence is all that is needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debs (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Well I didnt watch the TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. "I'm not a jurror, but I watched one on TV" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 11:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. some of us are not fooled by a steaming pile of so-called "reasonable doubt" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 11:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Unfortunately, the concept is lost on too many... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 08:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Although the standards of proof are not the same in civil vs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 09:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Simpson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-22-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. A "Not Guilty" verdict IS an acquittal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-23-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. The jury has three options only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:10 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Thanks for your excellent elucidation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. The 2nd trial was not double jeopardy and he was not found guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debs (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. In the American Justice system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 09:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. You're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-23-06 05:32 AM Response to Original message |
15. No, he really didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 09:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. And there's no reason not to think the opposite... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. How did an Al Sharpton v. Tucker Carlson thread turn into a rehash of the OJ trial? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
32. You know Tucker has Sharpton on his show in order to make Dems look bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 12:42 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Thank you for your concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC