Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Ozone Al" for president in 2008? The heat is on.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:52 PM
Original message
"Ozone Al" for president in 2008? The heat is on.
No, I don't much like the "Ozone Al" nickname (although he's been called worse), but it's a good article by Clarence Page.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-0605030029may03,1,7732027.column?coll=chi-news-col&ctrack=1&cset=true

Yes, despite the nattering nabobs of anti-Al negativism, there is no longer much dispute that global warming exists. The only argument centers on how quickly it is going to cause more devastation and how much of it is caused by humans. That's a debate Gore has been itching to have, and his side is looking more prescient by the day and too credible to be ignored.

And what better place to have that debate than a presidential campaign?

Sure, Gore's not running. Not yet. But he has a ready-made base of strong support from MoveOn.org and Howard Dean's army of feisty volunteers. Both groups tap him into the left's richest vein of fundraising and volunteers outside of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-N.Y.) political and fundraising juggernaut. She's way ahead in the polls and in fundraising, at present, but if the significant number of Democrats who doubt she can win the White House needs to coalesce around someone else, Gore is well-positioned to be wooed. And his movie hasn't even been released.

None of this means Gore is going to run, of course. But, if I were Hillary Clinton I'd be looking over my shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. According to Gore and reputable scientists, we only have 10 years left
before we reach the tipping point beyond which global warming will become unstoppable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We are so screwed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And our children and grandchildren are even more screwed. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Global warming weakens Pacific trade winds
We are more screwed than we realize! This was posted by MSNBC:

Global warming weakens Pacific trade winds

Long-term effect could disrupt marine food chain

By Ker Than

Updated: 1:45 p.m. ET May 3, 2006


NEW YORK - The trade winds in the Pacific Ocean are weakening as a result of global warming, according to a new study that indicates changes to the region's biology are possible.

Using a combination of real-world observations and computer modeling, researchers conclude that a vast loop of circulating wind over the Pacific Ocean, known as the Walker circulation, has weakened by about 3.5 percent since the mid-1800s. The trade winds are the portion of the Walker circulation that blow across the ocean surface.

The researchers predict another 10 percent decrease by the end of the 21st century.

The effect, attributed at least in part to human-induced climate change, could disrupt food chains and reduce the biological productivity of the Pacific Ocean, scientists said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12612965/from/RS.3/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. That is frightening! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Runaway global warming. If you want to see the end product of
runaway global warming, look at Venus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where the F* do they do these polls!?!?!
The one's in which Hillary Clinton is leading?

Is it in the Congressional cafeteria at the women's senator's table?

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. It could very well be Gore's time now, because of the increasing
concern over global warming. In regards to the planet, Al would certainly be the most knowledgeable and qualified candidate at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is Gore's time (again)
We all know he won in '00. A year from now when everyone is throwing their hat in the ring, Gore will be positoned as the most qualfied for the nation's problems. Frankly, I can't see Gore losing to anyone the Repukes put up (not McCain, not Condi, not Rudy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American liberal Donating Member (915 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree. I am a huge fan ever since his MLK speech in Jan.
But in all honesty, I pity any Democrat who follows this nightmare of an administration. I mean, how do you turn around a $3 trillion deficit? Even if every corporate welfare program and all the tax benefits for the richest 2% were reversed, I don't see any way this country could get back in the black in the next couple of generations, let alone presidential terms. And the Culture of Corruption continues to hemorrhage money--into the coffers of the oil industry and defense contractors! No, I do not envy whoever gets to be the first to start trying to clean up the mess the warmongers have made of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. I couldn't agree more
And while I personally would LOVE to see Dennis Kucinich as president, I would gladly accept, as well as actively campaign for, Gore. He cares about ALL people, he cares about the environment, he has experience, he won in 2000, and most of all - he's very intelligent. I feel he would not only win, but he would be the best president of my lifetime. Al Gore 2008 - The Anti-Bush. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Member of Dean's army reporting for duty!
Run Al run! And make Feingold your running mate!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Al Gore stands tall on the environmental questions, as do many in our
party, but Al is probably unbeatable in a debate on alternative fuels and environmental crises against any Republican living or dead. Most Republicans are more dead than they are living anyway, judging from their party's fierce denials of global warming.

Gore is well-positioned to use his considerable command of environmental and energy issues to help the nation out of its difficulties.

(One of the difficulties is our insistence that we can burn fuels with impunity like drunken sailors drink on shore leave on Saturday night. Our party needs to lead people into an energy-conscious future, and Gore is no slouch on an issue like that.)

If he jumps in, he would be formidable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. The moderators of the debates in 2004 kept environment off the table -
Kerry was able to link environmental efforts to national security and oil dependency, but, overall, the questioners were protecting Bush from getting hammered on this issue so they sidestepped the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I had the same sense -- that the debate moderators steered the
questioning to favor Bush. No wonder Gore sighed the way he did. I don't blame him.

Even with that slant, though, Kerry "steamrolled" Bush in those debates, to borrow a verb from Hunter S. Thompson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. I read that it was Paul Begala
who advised Gore to "roll his eyes and sigh heavily" after Tom Downy recused himself because he had been sent a tape of bush practicing his debates.

Anyone remember that? rove at work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I didn't hear that, but there are a lot of possibilities going on at any
given time behind the scenes, so who knows...

Bush is such a sluggish, incurious man that Gore and Kerry just mopped up in those debates. But many American voters didn't watch the debates, and that's part of the problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrasybulus Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. Rove plays a deep game
I remember reading that Clinton allowed a Gore confidante to run his reelection campaign in 1996, can't remember his name though.

After the election the campaign manager took a lobbying job and Republicans soon charged him with a conflict of interest. They nailed Gore, who prizes his integrity, and Gore got another manager before the 2000 campaign even started.

And remember that daddy Bush ran as VP in 1980 when Carter's debate book turned up in the Republican camp, and it wasn't voluntarily exposed either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Here's to rove's little
games being OVER..:toast: Welcome to DU, Thrasybulus!

If only we could charge all the repukes that have conflicts of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Not just the debates.
The Powers that Be inside the Democratic Party prevented The Environment from being an issue during 2004.
...too many Corporate Donors would have been upset.

Lets hope the Democratic Party has learned from the mistake.....or do they even consider it a mistake?
They DID set records in campaign contributions.


I could campaign and vote with pride and enthusiasm for Gore.

The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No, they do NOT think they made any mistakes.

You are very correct in that asking that. McAuliffe was bragging after the 2004 elections about the tremendous "victory". And I didn't put in those quotes to mean "sort of a victory". I put them in there because that is the exact word he used, "victory".

Cause to his ilk, raising more funds than the Republicans for the first time in decades is the true definition of victory. It made me seriously wonder, do they spend that money on the campaign? Or are they just pocketing huge amounts of it?

At least, Keyes (R-nutjob-whose-never-won-an-election) has the decency to openly PAY himself a large salary as part of his campaign spending.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I heard Kerry attach environment and alt-energy to national security at
Edited on Thu May-04-06 04:34 PM by blm
least a hundred times during the campaign. His Apollo Project idea was a highpoint for me. I would say that the corporate MEDIA downplayed it more than the Dem party centrists did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. NOT a "front burner issue" for the Dems in 2004....
...regardless of what you think you remember.

"The Environment" didn't appear until Page 35 of the 43 page Democratic Party Platform 2004 (the platform Kerry/Edwards ran on....the Platform handed to Kerry/Edwards by the Party Power Brokers)
http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v002/www.democrats.org/pdfs/2004platform.pdf

"The Environment" received about the same priority at the campaign events I attended, and even then the statements of "needing clean skies and water to turn over to our children" were empty platitudes without committment to a defined plan or proposed legislation.

I know. I was there.

The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. He connected environment to national security at almost EVERY appearance
Edited on Thu May-04-06 06:33 PM by blm
The whole idea of linking the urgency of fully funding alternative energy research to national security was started by Kerry and he highlighted it often.

I know. I watched it happen on Cspan and the rallies I attended.

The Dem party may have been off that page, but Kerry wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Fully Funding Alternative Energy research....
...is a completely different issue (and MUCH safer) than actually confronting the current Corporate Polluters who are funding your campaign.
......think about it. :)

The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I don't HAVE to think about it - I have a near-perfect memory and know
Edited on Thu May-04-06 06:57 PM by blm
that Kerry was proud of being an environmental candidate and had no problem saying so, despite what others in the Dem party were saying.

And linking the environment to national security was IMPORTANT for the American people in the election. Had it been covered with any fairness by the media, it wouldn't be taking the American people so long to awaken to the urgency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. If I was Hillary (or anybody running in 08) I would make this issue the
Edited on Thu May-04-06 07:14 AM by Mass
central point of my campaign.

This is the MAIN issue that will affect our planet for the XXI century. It will be the reason for wars of the future much more than terrorism is. It will affect economical conditions in our country and elsewhere. THIS HAS TO BE THE CENTER OF THE CAMPAIGN OF THE NEXT PRESIDENT or our world is doomed.

I want a president who does not think it is a side issue that you can address once in a while. I want a president who recognizes what major threat this is.

BTW, I recommend "The Weathermakers" by Flannery as an excellent book about global warming and the consequences it will have, if you are not convinced of how this important issue is .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. KICK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kira Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Does anyone have a link
to his book tour schedule or a way to find out which theatres "An Inconvenient Truth" will be in. I am not having any luck finding any specifics.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. This website has theater listings:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kira Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I found it
Edited on Thu May-04-06 10:39 AM by Kira
thank you so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Click on "See the Truth" — then that'll bring up a "pledge form" —
Edited on Thu May-04-06 10:41 AM by NYCGirl
and the link for theaters is at the bottom of the page.

Edited to add: You're welcome. I'm going to leave up these instructions for those who are still looking for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. I am being sincere when I say,
I have never so eagerly awaited a new movie coming out. I expect to have feelings of elation and depression from this experience, however I believe it's imperative for as many people as possible to see "An Inconvenient Truth" if we as a species are to have a chance at saving our selves. You cannot correct a wrong if you don't know there is a wrong and we have kept our heads in the sand far too long.





:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'd rather have them THINK Hillary is the frontrunner
so that Gore can jump in, unscathed, at the last minute.

I mean, the GOP goons already LOOOOOOVE to mock the shit out of Hil. Lets give them that for a while. Keep her up as a strawman, and then let Al Gore light her on fire and use her as torch to lead the way to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. Green Al! Sure looks good
on the cover of Vanity Fair..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC