Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards: Partnership with Russia a key to global stability

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:57 AM
Original message
John Edwards: Partnership with Russia a key to global stability
From Stanford University:

It is in America's interest to maintain a strategic partnership with Russia—despite its slide toward authoritarianism—because the former superpower can influence a host of critical issues affecting global security, former U.S. Sen. John Edwards said April 26.

From Iran's efforts to obtain nuclear weapons to worldwide concerns such as terrorism, health and security, Russia's influence matters, the 2004 vice presidential candidate told students and scholars during a lunchtime seminar at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. "Our relationship with Russia directly connects with every one of these issues," he said.

For example, "what Russia does on Iran is hugely important to the security of America and hugely important to the security of the world," he said. "Russia is hugely important in stopping Iran from marching forward with its nuclear weapons program."

Associate Professor Michael McFaul, director of the institute's Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, introduced Edwards, who gave a talk titled "Russia's Wrong Direction: What the United States Can and Should Do." The title was taken from a new Council on Foreign Relations report of a task force on U.S. policy toward Russia that Edwards co-chaired with former Republican Congressman Jack Kemp. McFaul and institute Director Coit D. Blacker, both Russia specialists, also were members of the 25-person task force.


Cont'd .... http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/may3/edwards-050306.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards' extremely valid point wouldn't be necessary if Condoleeza Rice
were still alive.

She was a Russian expert, wasn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not too well liked in Russia (via Pravda)
Snipped from: http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/88/354/16721_condoleezza.html


Condoleezza Rice's predecessor on the position, Madeleine Albright, was also an iron lady. Albright, however, was not noticed for the absurd straightforwardness of thinking. It is not a matter of Condoleezza Rice's lack of education: Ms. Rice was a favorite student of Madeleine Albright's father, Josef Korbel, a professor of the Denver University. Condoleezza Rice is not a woman; she is a function. No wonder she is still a Ms, not Mrs.

The mother of all iron ladies, Margaret Thatcher, was a family woman. Politics and nothing but politics has become the family life of Condoleezza Rice. Who on Earth will agree to build a relationship with a woman, who is ready to stand up and fight at any moment? Ms. Rice looks good for her profession indeed, but she has already celebrated her 50th birthday. Lonely women usually become resentful and unrestrained at this age.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a notorious Russian politician, the leader of the Liberal and Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) gave Pravda.Ru the following comments regarding Ms. Rice's statement on the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine.

“Condoleezza Rice is a very cruel, offended woman who lacks men's attention. She needs to be taken to a company of soldiers and it would be just fine. Releasing such stupid remarks gives her the feeling of being fulfilled. This is the only way for her to attract men's attention. The States needs to practice the old Soviet tradition when both single women and single men were not allowed to take responsible state positions,” Zhirinovsky said.


"Rice is not a woman, she is a function" :rofl:

Nice shout out to Margaret and Madeleine though :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hi, Catchawave. Yes. Albright is praised and Dr. Rice is reduced to
a "function."

Wow. THAT is a disparaging remark!

Condoleeza Rice is one of maybe 20 or 30 people who are within various degrees of striking distance of the presidency. That thought chills me. I'd welcome an Afro-American president and/or a female president, but I want the president to have her soul intact.

Condi sold hers a long time ago.

___

Nice to see you on these boards this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hi OC, and thank you!
:hug:

The entire Bush Administration chills me :cry: Even Laura worries me now, she's definitely NOT the power behind the throne, as her predecessors so eloquently proved :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow. He sounds like such a lightweight!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL.....
You scared me, stop it :sarcasm:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah. They have the worlds largest oil reserves
We better be nice to them or they'll cut us off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC