Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Wyden holding up Senate in attempt to repeal oil subsidies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:43 AM
Original message
Senator Wyden holding up Senate in attempt to repeal oil subsidies
The Republican majority does not wish to have a vote at this time. Wyden refuses to give up the floor until he can get a commitment, otherwise he would lose the floor. Wyden is arguing that the billions of dollars of tax-subsidies for the oil companies should be repealed. More or less, he's saying it is obscene and a disgrace to give these oil companies these tax breaks with the price of oil over $70 dollars a barrel. An argument over procedure is going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go Ron!
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good job, Wyden.
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 11:48 AM by blm
This is the bill we posted about the other day that Kerry was sponsoring, and Wyden is standing up for it - THANKYOU!!!

Kerry Introduces Bill to Repeal Wasteful Tax Giveaways for Oil Companies at Time of Record, Windfall Profits
April 25th, 2006 @ 12:20 pm

In response to Bush’s speech today on rising gas prices and his plan which analysts are already saying will not help, John Kerry will introduce a bill to repeal wasteful tax giveaways for oil companies at time of record, as oil companies see windfall profits.

Below is a statement from Senator John Kerry:

“For a moment, President Bush finally stopped talking like an oil company executive. Farmers, commuters and American families struggling with record gas prices need help more than oil interests which are giving their CEOs $400 million golden parachutes. I will introduce legislation today to repeal the president’s earlier tax giveaways for oil companies. The top oil executives told Congress they don’t need these tax breaks, and I hope the president was sincere today and will work aggressively to get this passed.

MORE & LINKS - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2763


BTW - Kerry's not around - he has a serious illness in the family, but no one knows any details at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Doing his job for the people who put him in DC.
Who else will step up on his behalf? Can they filibuster this thing?
I have to go turn the TV on..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sen. Bill Nelson helping now.
Says something is out of whack! Exxon has profit of $9 billion in three months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. There's plenty of dirt to tell in regards to OIL Co's profiteering..
There should be an endless barrage of storeys to tell today..plenty of reasons to repeal the tax and restore some decency and dignity to "we the people".
Everyone knows what the oil co's are doing..and why they are getting away with it. (Bush)..
They need to be called out on this disgraceful behavior..Its about time..

This should be spoken non-stop...It is the strongest campaign slogan ever....because it is obvious to every American.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. YES! Our voices can be heard occasionally in DC!
Thank you, Senator Wyden.

Links to contact him, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oregonjen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yes, phone# for DC 1-202-224-5244 email address...
email http://wyden.senate.gov/contact/

I called and thanked him! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Please keep us cube rats informed, thanks, DU! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dumb-ass Ted Stevens wants to compare this tax give-away to ANWR
oil reserves??? What a dumbass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. He wants to poison-pill the amendment by hangingANWR off of it
Now it is a big pissing contest. Wyden wants that bill to take away the $15 billion in tax cuts for Big Oil. So Stevens now wants to hang a vote to allow drilling in ANWR off of Wyden's bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep...
Wyden needs some assistance with these wolves that are attacking him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ted Stevens got in the act now.
He says he's been waiting 25 years for a vote on ANWAR. Wants to add the ANWAR drilling as a second degree amendment to Ron Wyden's amendment.

Now Wyden wants to modify his amendment. Stevens objects because he wants to add his ANWAR.

Wyden withdrew his unanimous request for a vote because of Stevens request, so Wyden is persisting on keeping the Floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. No Republicans will come out and say
that they don't want Wyden's amendment; they just want to block it from getting a vote. Pigs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Someone should point out that Stevens has blocked the repeal ...
of this robbery of the taxpayers of this country by the Big Oil companies by his attempt to add ANWR to the amendment. Stevens is standing up for Big Oil once again and voting against the average American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is absolutely the first action that should be taken....
people don't think these companies should be
getting government welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. It was Ron, during the hearings with the oil CEO's who asked each
one if they had utilized or even needed the Fed. subsidies, and would they object if they were just eliminated? Those who answered said they didn't utilize them and it wouldn't matter if they werre eliminated. To those who didn't answer, Ron said "Since I've heard NO objections to the elimination of the subsidies, I'm going to assume I should just do it!"

I'm glad to see he's following up on his promise!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks for the GREAT updates.
I've got to be out for a while so I really appreciate hearing from you all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Wyden says he'd like some Senator to come
to the Floor and say why this subsidy is needed. Hah! No takers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. They just want to kill this with procedural maneuvers.
It's pathetic. Kudos to Sen. Wyden for this move. I have a feeling he will have to withdraw it, because of the ANWR 2nd degree amendment that Stevens wants, but this was a good move.

Sigh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. The Democrats should use this time to educate the people...
and score a few political points if that is the game Stevens and the Repubs want to play. Yeah, we can play that game. I wish another Democrat would help him out here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. The biggest anti-ANWR Dems are:
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 11:43 AM by TayTay
Anyone have a list? Cantwell had her name on the last amendment to strip this out of a prior spending bill. Kerry has sent out email on it. (He was absent from the Senate yesterday due to an illness in the family.)

Who else champions this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Boxer is one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Cantwell is another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Damn. What a sleazy move on Stevens part
Sounds like a Rethug. Load a bill up with as much crap as possible in order to make the Dems drop it or vote against it. Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. But, But... He's DLC.
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 01:02 PM by nickshepDEM
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. UGH, then what he is doing is worthless and helping us LOSE!
:sarcasm: :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Primary his ass!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Reid just requested Wyden Amendment be put last on the list...
with no secondary amendments... Republicans object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. Senator Wyden is just awesome today...
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 01:48 PM by SnoopDog
He is really standing up for us right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sen. Wyden says: The outrageouse abuse
of taxpayer money seems to be the priority around here.

Senator Durbin helping Wyden now. Oil companies want it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. Also, in a time of RECORD PROFITS.
Wyden is correct when he says it's absurd to be giving these royalties to companies when oil it above $55 a barrel and they're all reporting record profits in the billions of dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Sen. Wyden says it is now clear that those
who oppose this amendment will NOT allow a vote on it.

I think he's about to give up the floor. He said he could talk until he fell over, but he still couldn't get a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Dominici says he wants the floor after
Wyden withdraws his amendment. Wyden says he has no intention of withdrawing his amendment. He may give up the floor, but won't withdraw the amendment.

Dominici says you've had plenty of time here. We have rights too, you know, says the red-faced pig.

Dominici says Wyden's amendment is meaningless. It's nothing. It's not a progam. It will yield zero dollars. Why should we let you have a vote on that. Dominici asks for the right to add a second-degree amendment. Wyden objects. Dominici leaves the floor.

Wyden wants to know why if the amendment is so meaningless and useless, that it didn't have a vote at 10:15 a.m. and dispose of it. Wyden says, let's go to a vote if this amendment is so meaningless.
I guess this program just happened by osmosis. The American people are going to remember this day.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Here's Harry Reid. I think you've
established that you will not get a vote on this amendment. Many disappointed Americans.

Does the Senator have any idea how much longer he will be talking.

I would stay here all night, until they literally had to take me off the floor because I couldn't talk any longer to save the taxpayer's money. I would stay here as look as it took if I thought the other side would let me have an up or down vote. The Senate is not going to operate the way it customarily does ... I want to protect the middle-class taxpayer ... it's clear that they aren't going to allow a vote.

Reid wants Wyden to wrap up in 3 minutes, and then go into a quorum call, and then Senator Cochrane have the floor.

Wyden says ... I wish that today we could have done right by all those middle-class folks. I'm going to be back making this fight again and again, the people of Oregon willing. I do not withdraw my amendment, but I yield the floor at this time.

Quorum call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. There are many a day
when I understand why so many Americans have such a low opinion of everyone in Congress. There are times when it seems hard tell a difference between the politicians on one side of the aisle from the other. The call to kick them all out of office and start all over sounds like a good idea every now and then but today was something different.

The GOP mantra of "up or down vote" was conspicuously absent when it came time to take a stand on such a straight forward idea of making the profit-rich oil companies pay their fair share for the resources they're taking from our lands. Of course no republican would stand up and say there were for giving away billions of dollars to the oil companies while we're taking a beating at the pump. Instead the cowardly republicans let Wyden's amendment slip through the procedural cracks in the Senate likely never to be voted on.

This was a day to point to when you hear people complain that there isn't a difference between Democrats and Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Here comes John Warner again wanting
to retire the aircraft carrier "USS John F. Kennedy". Shit on him. The carrier should be turned into a museum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Warner says it's costing the taxpayers
$20 million per month to keep this ship. He wants the amendment to be called up for consideration. YAY! Patty Murray objected. Kent Conrad up now. Amendment to pay for the war costs. War costs should have been budgeted and paid for. Instead, it's just been put on the credit card. Getting out his good ole charts. I love that man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC