Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

retired maj.general in charge of training Iraqi military:Rummy, step down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 03:59 PM
Original message
retired maj.general in charge of training Iraqi military:Rummy, step down
NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/opinion/19eaton.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

A Top-Down Review for the Pentagon

By PAUL D. EATON
Paul D. Eaton, a retired Army major general, was in charge of training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004.
Published: March 19, 2006
Fox Island, Wash.

DURING World War II, American soldiers en route to Britain before D-Day were given a pamphlet on how to behave while awaiting the invasion. The most important quote in it was this: "It is impolite to criticize your host; it is militarily stupid to criticize your allies."

By that rule, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is not competent to lead our armed forces. First, his failure to build coalitions with our allies from what he dismissively called "old Europe" has imposed far greater demands and risks on our soldiers in Iraq than necessary. Second, he alienated his allies in our own military, ignoring the advice of seasoned officers and denying subordinates any chance for input.

In sum, he has shown himself incompetent strategically, operationally and tactically, and is far more than anyone else responsible for what has happened to our important mission in Iraq. Mr. Rumsfeld must step down.

In the five years Mr. Rumsfeld has presided over the Pentagon, I have seen a climate of groupthink become dominant and a growing reluctance by experienced military men and civilians to challenge the notions of the senior leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. love it Rummy step down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, go away...
maybe we can start a chorus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Rum-dum was a CEO of a company, he would have been...
fired 3 months into the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i don't think he would have got that far n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. While I am glad to read this letter, from this source
I respectfully disagree on two points.

First, I don't agree that Rumsfeld "is far more than anyone else responsible for what has happened in Iraq" because I believe that that distinction must go to Mr. Rumsfeld's boss, George W. Bush.

Second, while the description of the evolution of the thinking processes within Rumsfeld's Pentagon are, no doubt, accurate, they again mirror the processes within all other executive departments under Bush. Rumsfeld is very much a major part of this problem, and it might help somewhat if he would retire, but he is not the core of the problem, his boss is, and should he retire his boss is fully capable of filling the position with some other flunky equally uncomfortable with exercising, voicing, or tolerating independent thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. i have never seen...
an administration with so many incompetent cronies in key positions. so yes you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC