Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 2008 Democratic Convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mr_King Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 02:53 AM
Original message
The 2008 Democratic Convention
I just found out the 2008 DNC will be from August 25, - August 28, 2008. Why is it so late this time around? I mean the Repunks will get to have their convention last which means they will probably have their's in late September (closer to the election then it was in 2004).

I think the convention should be held in mid July like it was in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, '92. The first convention I remember.
My family was painting our back patio, listening to the speeches on the radio. That's the last time our family was solidly Democratic. Sigh.

Seriously, though, it's not going to matter much. The GOP could purchase lap dances to every undecided voter in America and they'll still lose next time around. Trust me on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's about the federal election money.
Once the candidate is nominated he/she cannot spend any money raised during the primary season. So the Dem candidate would have to start dipping into the federal allotment during a period that the Repugs were spending primary money and conserving their federal cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_King Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I forgot about that...
I guess having it late is for the best then. I don't see the Republicans getting much of a bounce after their convention after looking at their field on canidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. This last one was way too early. I think it's better to have it later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. They should try to have it the week before the Repub Convention.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is because of the money.
After the Convention who can't use the cash you raised for the Primaries. It is when you get the federal money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Olympics
8-24 August 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. The political party of a sitting President always holds their convention
first.

The GOP will hold their convention in July, followed by the Dems in August.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The last few elections, it's been the other way around
Did you mean to say the incumbent party's convention is usually last?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thank you - YES, IHTGOP, you are absolutely right
I stand corrected. What was I thinking? :shrug:

Oh, yeah - I had a flashback to the '96 Democratic Convention in Chicago. Ah, those were the good ole days!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why is the republican convention 2nd in 08? Why was it 2nd in 04?
How is this decided?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Parties aren't required to have their convention at a specific time
Democrats are likely having it late in 2008 because in 2004, when they had it at the end of July, they ended up at a disadvantage in federal election money. The FEC gives out federal funds to both nominees in exchange for them suspending most donating operations. By having their convention first (which is what the party out of power has historically done....example, the Republicans had their '00 convention in late July in the reverse of '04) Kerry had to save money and do a blackout for much of August. Now, during this time, the Swiftboat Veterans came onto the air and started running ads against him. Kerry's eventual response forced him to spend some of his own money to fight them off. Meanwhile, Bush was also able to spend freely and still raise money for a full month after Kerry stopped. The Democrats are trying to end this disparity by having their convention as late as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because having it early was a huge disadvantage
An unintented consequence of the campaign finance law is that you use your General Election money from the convention to the election. Kerry had to spend GE money for 13 weeks vs Bush's 8 weeks (numbers may be slightly off.) Even though Kerry raised a huge amount during the primaries he legally couldn't spend it. (Much was given to the party and other candidates.)

This put Kerry in the position of not being able to spend a large amount in August to counter the SBVT without putting himself at a major disadvantage in Oct/Nov. McCAuliffe made this this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanah Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. a convention of by and for the democrats
you know what would be really nice? If our democratic convention wasn't just a big show, and the people of the democratic party could actually talk and create our platform together.

The last convention was totally controlled, no one was allowed to talk about the war. It was Kerry's convention. I think the convention should belong to the people of the democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC