Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Coleman defends Bush in call for impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:11 PM
Original message
Sen. Coleman defends Bush in call for impeachment
It is nice that Hillary Clinton and John Kerry provided him with such nice talking points.
I think Congresscritters are getting lots of calls for impeachment. I will be responding to this letter with another phone call to Coleman's office.
Keep the pressure on!


Dear katinmn:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me concerning impeachment proceedings against President George W. Bush.

I do not believe the President's decision to invade Iraq is cause for initiation of impeachment proceedings, as President Bush did not "mislead" our country into war with Iraq. The President came to the conclusion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and represented a threat to the U.S. based on objective information provided by our intelligence agencies. He was not alone in his assessment. The majority of Congress, including members of both sides of the aisle, voted in favor of the Iraq Resolution (S.J. Res. 45) authorizing the President to use force in Iraq. When the Senate voted 77-23 on this resolution, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) stated, "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program." Additionally, Senator John Kerry (D-MA) stated that "according to the CIA's report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons." Bipartisan consensus existed about the presence of a weapons program at the time of the coalition invasion in 2003. Furthermore, foreign intelligence agencies, such as those in Great Britain, Australia, and France had also concluded that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

Clearly, there were intelligence failures leading up to the war in Iraq. For this reason, the Senate Intelligence Committee completed an investigation on the pre-war intelligence on Iraq. In a bipartisan report issued on July 7, 2004, the Committee concluded that the intelligence assessment of Iraq 's weapons of mass destruction capabilities was not the result of political pressure. Other bipartisan investigations have also concluded that no political pressure was applied to intelligence analysts in their evaluation of Saddam's weapons programs.

I will continue to follow this important issue. While we may disagree at times, I appreciate hearing from you and hope you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue of concern to you.

Sincerely,
Norm Coleman
United States Senate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Danieljay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. write him back and call bullshit...
Most of those in congress received HAND PICKED intelligence only and did not have access to intelligence that was given to the Chimp. The intelligence provided to congress was filtered and screened to meet the agenda of the current administration and the corporations that stood to benefit from this war at the expense of the US Taxpayer and the lives of our men and women in uniform. This administration is the most corrupt we have ever seen. Anyone who supports it despite the evidence of corruption is a self centered ignorant fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Oh, I plan to.
Just because he is a water carrier doesn't mean we can let him slide blithely along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Reminds me I haven't emailed the weasel for a while
to tell him what he's done wrong lately. I'll remedy that tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Thanks. One thing about Mr. C. He always responds
It's a predictable response but it's better than being completely ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. You're right, he does always respond...
along the lines of, "Blah-blah-blah-blah-blah. I'm still a Bush toadie."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
49jim Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Norm,
It's easy to come to those conclusions when are given "cherry-picked" and intentionally false information!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. since we believed bush's lies, bush is no longer responsible?
other senators supported the war because they believed bush's lies so therefore, bush is not responsible for
telling those lies in the first place?

norm coleman is a senator? must be a republican.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/democratsmugs.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I got a similar letter today in the mail.
FU Norm... as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I expected this, but I keep telling him my preferences anyhow
I know it must be the same with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. How in the hell did a normal thinking Minnesotan ever get conned
into voting for this asswipe?

John Gotti had more class and charisma than Norman Coleman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Bushco killed Wellstone
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 09:28 PM by dflprincess
that's how it happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That was a big lost to the party for sure.
No one ran against Coleman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Remember, Wellstone died only 11 days before the election
On the Wednesday after his death, the DFL endorsed Walter Mondale to replace him in the race. This was also when the right wing was spinning the Memorial Service as the most terrible thing that had ever happened in all of recorded history.

As the other poster said, Mondale was up 6 points and lost by a very small margin, something was very fishy about that election. What I remember best was precincts running out of ballots and people having to wait for more to be brought to them. There were also some dirty tricks being pulled with call being made to people telling them it was not too late to vote absentee which was true, but what they were told was that they should cross out Wellstone's name and write Mondale's in place of it. This would have invalidated the ballot, technically, Mondale's name would have to have been written in the area for write-in votes. I know 3 people who received those calls. The attorney general (a DFLer) did issue a public statement that all ballots where the voter's intention was clear had to be counted. But who knows if they were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Not only that--the Secretary of State ruled that all absentee ballots
for Coleman would be counted as they were but that all Wellstone supporters who had voted absentee before the crash would have to revote by the end of Election Day.

In order to do so, they would have to send a letter authorizing someone to go to their county courthouse to pick up a new absentee ballot and get it to the absentee so that the absentee could return it to said county courthouse on time.

My mother and stepfather were visiting me in Oregon (having voted absentee before leaving), and they didn't find out about this ruling until it was too late to do anything about it.

The part about the absentee ballots was infuriating. ALL absentee ballots should have been invalidated in that case OR the Secretary of State could have ruled that the absentee ballots merely had to be postmarked by Election Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVK Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. You got that right. They killed Wellstone and rigged the election.
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 11:20 PM by PVK
Mondale was ahead by 6 points in the days leading up to the election. Everyone here in the DFL was coming out to vote for him in Paul's name.

It was FIXED. No doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Intelligence failures my ass
Bush took the faulty made up intelligence and fooled that list of Congress members and foreign countries with it, and he poo-pooed the REAL intelligence and mowed down anyone who got in his way.


I'm so sick of their bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I save this little tidbit just for occasions like this
(T)he Senate Intelligence Committee completed an investigation on the pre-war intelligence on Iraq. In a bipartisan report issued on July 7, 2004, the Committee concluded that the intelligence assessment of Iraq 's weapons of mass destruction capabilities was not the result of political pressure.

Can you say "whitewash"?

If not, please click here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVK Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Link not working. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits
From The Washington Post
Dated Thursday June 5, 2003


Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits
By Walter Pincus and Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writers

Vice President Cheney and his most senior aide made multiple trips to the CIA over the past year to question analysts studying Iraq's weapons programs and alleged links to al Qaeda, creating an environment in which some analysts felt they were being pressured to make their assessments fit with the Bush administration's policy objectives, according to senior intelligence officials.

With Cheney taking the lead in the administration last August in advocating military action against Iraq by claiming it had weapons of mass destruction, the visits by the vice president and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "sent signals, intended or otherwise, that a certain output was desired from here," one senior agency official said yesterday.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVK Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That one doesn't work either. THIS one does though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. delete - Not worth it.
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 06:25 PM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. whatever
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 06:27 PM by katinmn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. I could probably reproduce that post even though I've never seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ask him how his teeth feel, and was a tooth job worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. ah, there's the rub.
The intelligence Congress was provided has been unequivocally proved to be cherry-picked.

Now if the Intelligence Committee would finish their goddamn job, the other part of the investigation, i.e., how the intelligence was misused, Norm's "talking points" would be rendered moot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. But the investigation is concluded. Just like the spying case is
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 07:17 PM by katinmn
concluded, for all practical purposes. And the UAE port deal will be "concluded" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlSheeler4U Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. In the military there's a term called oodle loop....
the concept is that it distorts real from feigned information to the degree the enemy is expending resources going off in the wrong direction and never knowing it.

Don't buy off on the deception. The paper trail was there.

What is absence was not addressing the reason we originally invaded. Al Qaeda link to 9/11 or rather the absence. There was many dismissals of UN and then US investigations.

Cutting to the chase. No WMDs found. Saddam gone. Why still there? The infrastructure was destroyed during Desert Storm and sanctions, so the "to build a stable democracy" is crap.

There are so many other areas of address like ignoring August 6 PDB on Osama and commercial air... Valerie Plame...... well you know the rap.

Go get 'em kiddo.

Carl "Be Patriotic Impeach Bush" Sheeler
Sheeler for US Senate
www.carlsheeler.com

Democrats, not aristocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Go Galloway On Him
Norm plays the tough guy when he can't be challenged face to face. His defense of this administration is indefensible and can easily be exposed in a public forum by anyone with half a brain and a sense of justice. Even Brownie did a heck of a job standing up to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. When Galloway was touring the US last year I wrote his peeps
and begged them to make a pass through Minneapolis.

They said maybe next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. Their claim, in sum: "Bush didn't lie, he just really, really screwed up".
Why would they work this hard to convince people that Bush had made the most monumental mistake of any president in U.S. history unless the truth was even worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. Any intel officer providing contrary evidence got a one-way ticket to
Palukaville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaBob Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. Senator Coleman
Katinmn,
Write a reply to Senator coleman's response to your original letter and ask him what it would take for him to support impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. He's my Senator too and in every email I remind him......
....he was elected to do the people's work, not his own.:bounce: He has yet to ever address that point.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariecurie Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
35. I wonder
How would he have responded if the impeachment was over the illegal wiretapping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
36. I miss Paul Wellstone!
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 12:16 AM by Cascadian
God! King Rat Coleman's statement alone just took me back to when I first got news that Paul Wellstone was killed while listening to NPR's Talk of the Nation's Science Friday. Ira Plaitow broke the news and I felt like my stomach just got sucker punched. Don't ask me why it brought back those memories but it did. Gawd! In 2008 I hope Minnesotans will get this rat bastard out of office!

Coleman is a sleazeball!



John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC