Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barron's mag: Congress should consider impeaching Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 02:17 PM
Original message
Barron's mag: Congress should consider impeaching Bush
This shows just how much trouble Bush is in. If the mainstream corporate business press wants him impeached, he's sunk.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2005/12/24/barrons-congre_n_12841.html

Surely the "strict constructionists" on the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary eventually will point out what a stretch this is. The most important presidential responsibility under Article II is that he must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." That includes following the requirements of laws that limit executive power. There's not much fidelity in an executive who debates and lobbies Congress to shape a law to his liking and then goes beyond its writ.

Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment.

It is important to be clear that an impeachment case, if it comes to that, would not be about wiretapping, or about a possible Constitutional right not to be wiretapped. It would be about the power of Congress to set wiretapping rules by law, and it is about the obligation of the president to follow the rules in the Acts that he and his predecessors signed into law. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy howdy,, if this goes down..... (big if, hope it becomes a small
if soon) all the people I have discussed the dangers of having this entity in charge of the country are going to think that I have a crystal ball, or that I am able to spy on any and all Americans with impunity. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G2099 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "I" Word has finally come out of the closet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Understand Change of Heart
I now think I know why Naptilano was so willing to admit that the impeachment of Clinton was a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, Barrons is mainstream corporate GOP
That's an important rat that just jumped overboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Next? WSJ?? Come on!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC