Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We KNOW the Reich Wing attacked the Clintons relentlessly, but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:15 PM
Original message
We KNOW the Reich Wing attacked the Clintons relentlessly, but
When did it start? What was the 'trigger' event'? Did the RW freaks start beating on Hillary during her health care initiative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. They started way before he was elected!
Remember the big deal about Jeniffer Flowers?

They were determined to bring him down one way or another. Truth or not, they tried everything they could think of. I was a little pissed at him for being so foolish as to do his game playing in the WH, but I also don't know very many, if any, people who's life could withstand 8+ years of investigation and not produce SOMETHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Every dem candidate/president from now on be attacked by the GOP
They are stuck in attack mode and it is fueled by their propagandists AKA savage/Limbaugh etc. Had Kerry won the GOP would have immediately tried to Impeach him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsdsharp Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, it started earlier, during the campaign.
They were pissed that she wasn't a stay-at-home Mom, and had the temerity to have(and use!) a law degree from Yale. That, coupled with the 60 minutes defense if Bill during the Gennifer Flowers deal (how dare she keep her family together rather than divorce him!), her statement about not just being some little woman standing behind her man and baking cookies, coupled with Bill's comment about voters getting two for the price of one sort of drove them over the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. yep, and then really geared up after the inauguration.
They put the Clintons thru a living hell. D*mn those repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. He got elected
I'm telling you, something about Clinton - maybe because he was a Washington "outsider," as the press saw it - rubbed the Washington press corps the wrong way, and I remember thinking, when I saw that morons on Meet The Press talking about Clinton's "angry outburst" at a press conference, "He is so screwed."

I had seen the same press conference, and someone had asked him a question that was full of inaccuracies, and Clinton very methodically - as is his wont - set the questioner straight. No anger, no outburst, just Clinton cleaning up the sloppy question.

They never liked Clinton because - this is my theory - he was cocky, he looked like a guy who loved pussy, and he was a guy who got all he wanted.

To top it off, he became President of the United States.

Jealousy, Rick. Jealousy.

Then they went after Hillary because she was "uppity."

Snakes, all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And it still just kills the freepers
That Bill is having a good time, making lots of money on his own, and playing the sax. Too bad that the Rhodes scholar didn't get to do as much good for the country as he could have because he served on the receiving end as the biggest prototype for "politics of personal destruction" and had to fight against Newt's "Contract on America."

Hope all those fuckers are happy now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. 1988-1989, Lee Atwater "opened a file" on Clinton
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 04:26 PM by Solly Mack
Thought him the only real threat coming their way - it grew and grew from there.

After Clinton gave a speech at the convention ('88), was when Atwater "noticed" him.

I'd opine that Hillary was always an intended target as well - and anything they could attack her on (health care) was just a bonus.

Even before Clinton took office, Bob Barr called for his impeachment. (1992)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I don't even feel guilty
Whenever I think of how and when Atwater died, I get a little tickle of delight.

He just didn't suffer enough for what that prick did to American politics.

Maybe now his precious handmaiden, Rove, will pay the earthly price that Atwater ducked out of paying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Check the movie "The Hunting Of The President"
It gives a great primer and overall look at how and why the thugs got started in their mission to attempt to take Clinton out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Great movie ...saw it wilh a packed
house in a very Republican town and you could hear a pin drop....people who came out of that movie, like myself, were angry ...you could feel it in the air..we need to brig that back and also "the smartest guys in the room"...is great...( about Enron)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Just watched that tonight . . .
Also watched Unprecedented . . . weirds me out that the library had BOTH of these movies on DVD.

Yeah, if you really want to get your blood boiling, or you just want to prove to someone once and for all how unabashedly shameless and ruthless the Republican Rich Reich is, show them these two DVDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. The second he won the nomination. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks!!!
I'm debating a RW idiot on another board who claims the RW NEVER targeted Hillary during Bill's years in ofiice!!! What a friggin' moran!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Right after Bush1 won in 88, Atwater and W started files on potential Dem
candidates for 92. Clinton was one of them. That's why they tried to embroil him in various financial scams, but discovered he wasn't interested in money.

The first run of their smear campaign tactics using Scaife and Moon papers was against Kerry when he was opening up the IranContra and BCCI can of worms.

They used that type of smear journalism against Clinton when he took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. The answer is in "The Hunting of the President"
Rumor has it it started when Clinton was approached by the Bushies prior to the '92 election asking him to sit out that election so GHWB could have a second term, and Clinton told 'em to sit on it. And they decided for his impudence and particularly his win that Clinton must pay and pay and pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rick Myers, come on down!
As some have mentioned, the attack on Clinton began during the presidenial race, and escalated into a full blown lynch mob after the 1994 taking of the House by the Pukes.

A key player in those days was Richard Scaife Mellon, who, along with Rupert Murdoch and Sun Moon, drastically impacted political news to its detriment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Here's the face of evil ... Richard Mellon Scaife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. It started long before he decided to run for president.
Read "The Hunting of the President" by Joe Conoson and Gene Lyons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. He wasn't hawk enough for the neoconnie's
http://www.davidfrum.com/archive.asp?YEAR=1997

SHOWDOWN WITH SADDAM SHOWED UP A HOBBLED U.S. MILITARY
Clinton's horror of shedding blood causes more suffering among Iraq's civilians than a war would
November 22, 1997, The Financial Post


>Saddam is a man of violence; force is the only thing he respects. But Clinton is afraid to use force. When he sent aircraft carriers to the Gulf, he ordered them to sail as slowly as possible -- to postpone the moment at which he would have to decide whether to order air strikes. Worse, it's not clear how effective the U.S. military remains. Since the Gulf War, U.S. military spending has plunged by one-third, adjusted for inflation, from US$ 273 billion (in 1987 dollars) in fiscal 1990 to $ 180 billion (1987 dollars) in the current fiscal year. Clinton often boasts that fewer people work for the federal government today than at any time since the Kennedy administration. That's true. What he fails to point out is that all the net reductions in federal employment are due to the shrinkage of the military.<



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC