Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers nomination is a clear cut act of crony constitutionalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:43 PM
Original message
Miers nomination is a clear cut act of crony constitutionalism
The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051024/editors

Crony Constitutionalism

posted October 6, 2005 (October 24, 2005 issue)

The nomination of White House counsel Harriet Miers to fill the seat of retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor is a measure of George W. Bush's unprecedented political weakness. With the Iraq debacle, the Katrina disaster and the DeLay indictments, ambitious Republicans are now distancing themselves from the White House. The O'Connor vacancy presented a dilemma: On the one hand, appointing a judge bearing the activist right's stamp of approval on abortion, the environment and other contested issues would court not only unified opposition from Democrats but defection by moderate GOP senators. On the other hand, appointing a genuinely distinguished moderate jurist, legal scholar or political leader would insure a far-right revolt.

Bush's solution: Appoint a personal adviser with few apparent qualifications. Miers has never argued a Supreme Court case, published a significant law-review article or shown in her career any interest in constitutional issues. It's true that historically Justices have carried diverse résumés, and until recent years many came to the Court without experience on the bench. But comparisons to Earl Warren or William Rehnquist do not flatter Miers, whose "leadership" consists of managing a law firm's representation of Disney and Microsoft and keeping Bush clear of fallout from the Texas lottery scandal and his National Guard desertion.

There is still much to learn about Miers, but it's already clear that her nomination is an act of crony constitutionalism at a time when Bush's agency-packing schemes have led FEMA and Homeland Security to disaster. As with Chief Justice Roberts, Bush's main interest seems to be an Associate Justice friendly to his expansion of executive powers. As White House counsel, Miers is surely implicated in the profound civil liberties and presidential-powers cases now wending their way through the courts. The Judiciary Committee must aggressively seek the tenor of her advice on these matters--if for no other reason than to protect the Supreme Court institutionally from a conflict of interest, since cases in which Miers has given advice will probably be heard by the Court.

It also must be said that while Miers has no track record on constitutional matters, she is hardly a cipher. Despite unhappiness in some corners of the right with her appointment, she appears to be a committed social conservative, voting against legalizing gay sex during her brief stint on the Dallas City Council, donating to Texans United for Life and working unsuccessfully to turn the American Bar Association away from its support for abortion rights. As president and managing partner of Locke Liddell & Sapp, she oversaw a law firm that worked assiduously for Texans for a Republican Majority and was forced to return an illegal contribution to Tom DeLay's defense fund.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's a Republican Texan with all the garbage
and W think's she's SC material?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. so is he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree-- Reid and Schumer, don't you dare vote "aye"
She's not only a crony conservative, she's also one of the most reprehensible lawyers in the nation defending corrupt big businesses, and screwing over both consumers and environmental causes. Bush picked her to gut what's left of the environmental movement that Bush hasn't already ruined with his weakening of the EPA.

Miers must be rejected. DO YOU HEAR THAT, REID AND SCHUMER? You will lose your entire support base if you vote "Aye" on this nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. last time i saw Reid ...
he was heaping praise all over her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh please,
our great leader said she was the most qualified person he could find. Of course, at the time, the only people within his view were himself (probably adoring himself in the mirror) and the cleaning staff. Wait a minute, maybe the cleaning staff might be a better choice. At least THEY know how to work hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC