Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The President, the National Response Plan, and "Catastrophic Incidents"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:56 PM
Original message
The President, the National Response Plan, and "Catastrophic Incidents"
http://www.greatamericannero.com/research/nrpresearch/index.htm

from the National Response Plan....

"The President leads the Nation in responding effectively and ensuring the necessary resources are applied quickly and efficiently to all Incidents of National Significance.As necessary, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security convenes interagency meetings to coordinate policy issues. Though White House-level coordination mechanisms are not described in detail in the NRP, all other Federal coordinating mechanisms and entities described in the NRP support, and are consistent with White House-level interagency coordination."

later on...

"A catastrophic incident, as defined by the NRP, is any natural or manmade incident, including terrorism, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the population, infrastructure, environment, economy, national morale, and/or government functions. A catastrophic incident could result in sustained national impacts over a prolonged period of time; almost immediately exceeds resources normally available to State, local, tribal, and private-sector authorities in the impacted area; and significantly interrupts governmental operations and emergency services to such an extent that national security could be threatened. All catastrophic incidents are Incidents of National Significance. These factors drive the urgency for coordinated national planning to ensure accelerated Federal/national assistance."

and

"Federal support must be provided in a timely manner to save lives, prevent human suffering, and mitigate severe damage. This may require mobilizing and deploying assets before they are requested via normal NRP protocols."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. ".....prevent human suffering..."
things that make you go hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes!!! The nonsense about the locals being responsible is belied by *'s
OWN National Response Plan...it was his administration that pushed it through and got it put into place, as a result of 9/11. The idea being that the U.S. needed to improve coordination among governmental agencies in response to disaster.

In another section it also SPECIFICALLY states that the President should set the emergency response into motion when the state/local resources are overwhelmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You know, the people defending Nagin/Blanco
from having their efforts taken over by the feds--supporting Blanco 4 days post-Katrina in saying *she* was in charge--and the people who claim that the feds were in charge straight along, really have to get on the same planet.

That said, in Louisiana the 'incident of national significance' bit I think was only declared a couple of days post-landfall; in Tx, it was declared on Wednesday or Thursday, well pre-landfall. Still, in Tx, it was the locals that ran things. It was their call, not *'s, when they were overwhelmed. This seems reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In Katrina, it appears that NOBODY was really in charge for several days,
at least. The question is, who was supposed to be. We could go through all the stuff about the governor requesting assistance, etc., but I'm not certain that is really useful.

As for declaring Katrina an "incident of national significance," I believe I read someplace that it was not even Brown's responsibility, and in fact Brown was not authorized to act according to the National Response Plan, until an incident of national significance was declared. I believe the NRP gives that responsibility to CHERTOFF! Whose own actions appear to have been forgotten in the aftermath and the media focus on Brown.

Ultimately, of course, we all know where the buck stops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's pretty much what I think.
I butt heads with those saying Blanco/Nagin are completely without blame, and those that say they bear all the blame.

Most embarrassing is watching politicians playing games. This is too important for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sadly, the politics part will be hard to avoid; EVERYTHING is political.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. "A catastrophic incident....severely affecting....national morale".
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 03:38 PM by neweurope
Now what might that be?

----------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC