Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Changes his Tune re: Firing the Leaker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
the old gringo Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:10 AM
Original message
Bush Changes his Tune re: Firing the Leaker
President Bush was hedging his bets today, by saying that anyone in his administration who was found to have committed a crime in a federal investigation of the leak of a covert CIA agent's name would be fired. Note the new framing: anyone who is found to have "committed a crime", not anyone who leaked the name, as he has insisted for the last two years.

How low can the man stoop? How much more will the American public stand for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess it depends on what the meaning of "committed a crime" is.
Nope, I don't think Americans will fall for it, except for his clueless worshippers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. A whole lot...they're used to watching jugglers and magicians...
...especially that one trick where one of the balls gets tossed into the air and Never Comes Back.

Distraction, obfuscation, subterfuge...these are the tools to keep all the balls in the air and the missing one out of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. illegality
means someone found out, so you have to fire them.
immorality doesn't matter.

lesson learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. I believe he said "dealt with" not "fired"
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 11:22 AM by leveymg
His phrasing was coached back then too.

Dealt with: "Okay Karl, how many cards? Scooter, you gonna ante up there, boy?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Actually: "Taken care of" was the term he used
He's keeping his promise....really. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm corrected.
Of course they're being very careful with him. If dropped, he might explode - Gawd, what a mess.:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Flip-flop, flip-flop,flip-flop!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Time for us to use that meme against him! I'd love to hear Dean use it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. does he pardon the leaker before or after he fires them?
ya know it's gonna happen....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. if Bush pardons the leaker, he won't have to fire him
because the pardon will take care of that whole "convicted of a crime" thing, now won't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can you imagine that?
President Einstein here is saying he won't fire somebody, "unless they've been convicted". Imagine, the deputy chief of staff, walking around with security clearance, access to all kinds of sensitive information, and Your Truly won't do anything until this creep is convicted.

You're right: this is a new low. For Bush, for the US. And for the world which is watching: disgust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. In other words, being indicted is no longer grounds for firing
We have to wait a couple of years for the trial to see if Rove is convicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. What happened to avoiding even the appearance of impropriety?
Once again, with Republicans in charge, government is not to be undertaken by selfless public servants working for the common good, but merely the plaything of corrupt individuals who haven't yet been convicted for their crimes.

But I guess it IS comforting to know that should someone in Bush administration actually be convicted of a crime, that Bush will promptly get rid of that person, and revoke his security access. Does Bush say if this applies should the person convicted appeal the conviction, or will they maintain their office and clearance pending any and all appeals?

Corrupt, corrupt, corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC