Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DLC is "Going Nowhere" - The Nation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:27 PM
Original message
DLC is "Going Nowhere" - The Nation
Going Nowhere
The DLC Sputters to a Halt
by Ari Berman


n May 2003 the centrist Democratic Leadership Council published its yearly list of "100 New Democrats to Watch." The DLC frequently puts out these lists as a way to publicly solidify its identification with the New Democratic movement within the Democratic Party. The 2003 list, however, contained a number of questionable additions, including then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama. As a state senator, Obama had continually passed progressive legislation--a record that he vowed to add to when he began his run for the US Senate on a platform of clear opposition to the Patriot Act, the Iraq War and NAFTA, all positions anathema to the DLC. The puzzling addition caused The Black Commentator magazine to wonder, a month after the DLC list came out, whether Obama had been "corrupted" by the centrist group. Obama's reply to the Commentator was indicative of how the DLC plays the "New Democrat" card.

"Neither my staff nor I have had any direct contact with anybody at the DLC since I began this campaign a year ago," Obama wrote. "I don't know who nominated me for the DLC list of 100 rising stars, nor did I expend any effort to be included on the list.... I certainly did not view such inclusion as an endorsement on my part of the DLC platform." After realizing that his name appeared in the DLC's database, Obama asked to have it removed. The message was clear: The DLC needed Obama a lot more than Obama needed the DLC.


Today, the same is true for many politicians. After dominating the party in the 1990s, the DLC is struggling to maintain its identity and influence in a party beset by losses and determined to oppose George W. Bush. Prominent New Democrats no longer refer to themselves as such. The New Democratic movement of pro-free market moderates, which helped catapult Bill Clinton into the White House in 1992, has splintered, transformed by a reinvigoration of grassroots energy. A host of new donors, groups and tactics has forged a new direction for Democrats inside and outside the party, bringing together vital parts of the old centrist establishment and the traditional Democratic base. The ideological independence of the DLC, which pushed the party to the right, has come to be viewed as a threat rather than a virtue, forcing the DLC to adapt accordingly. Corporate fundraisers and DC connections--the lifeblood of the DLC--matter less and less: Witness the ascent of MoveOn.org and Howard Dean's election as chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). "It's not that the DLC changed," says Kenneth Baer, who wrote a history of the organization. "It's that the world changed around the DLC."

Today's DLC is a far cry from the anti-establishment organization created by New Democrats who captured power within the party in the Clinton era by distancing themselves from the party's traditional base and liberal candidates. After co-founding the DLC in 1985, former Congressional aide Al From aggressively expanded what had been an informal caucus of Southern and Western Congressmen into a $7-million-a-year operation at its peak in 2000. By that time it had 5,000 members, who paid $50 a pop to join; and politicians, policy wonks and lobbyists flocked to its annual conferences. The DLC's tough free-market positions, connections to big business and early media savvy enticed Clinton into becoming chair in 1990. Although the organization always took more credit than it deserved for his 1992 victory, downplaying Ross Perot's impact and Clinton's own charisma, that election nevertheless institutionalized the DLC's rising status. DLC strategists William Galston, Elaine Kamarck and Bruce Reed became top domestic policy aides in the Clinton White House. After the Republican Revolution of 1994, From told the Democrats to "get with the program." The DLC quickly became the new Washington establishment, launching state chapters, creating a New Democratic Coalition in Congress and expanding its Progressive Policy Institute think tank. A top aide to Jesse Jackson groused of the post-Clinton Democratic Party, "The DLC has taken it over."

-snip-

more


http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050321&s=berman



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The DLC has done more to kill our party than the Republicans
And don't give me that shit statement "Clinton wins elections" that's because he didn't campaign like a wimpy DLCer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. he also had help from an awful bush daddy campaign
and a worse bob dole campaign.

that's not saying clinton isn't bright or aggressive in the right ways.

but clinton's time at running for office was markedly different than 00 and 04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeolian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. please
The only campaigns in recent history WORSE than dubbya's have been Gore's and Kerry's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Gore's campaign was better. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MollyStark Donating Member (816 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Gore won his election by getting more votes than Bush that year
That would mean that Gore's campaign was better than Bush's which was in turn better than Kerry's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeolian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. My point is more that
Gore should have blown the shrub out of the water in 2000. The fact that it was close enough for Florida to have mattered was an embarassment, in my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. And he had the Perot factor
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 07:46 AM by iconoclastNYC
A lot of right-wingers protested HW raising taxes and the Souter SCOTUS nomination by voting perot. Gore would have won (by a bigger margin) if he had a spoiler on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Clinton's attack ads made it possible for Perot to enter the race
Clinton was beating Bush from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. this should be required reading.
Thank you. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nice to hear n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. 2 "Nation" staffers on CSPAN Journal Tuesday AM
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 02:18 AM by paineinthearse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Kang Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. excellent news
I know I am repeating a sentiment but the DLC has hurt us more than the GOP in the last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So let me REPEAT it for you, in my own words....
The DLC _is_ the GOP, fer Chrissake!

The DLC's favorites are a 'Who's Who' of Dems who vote Repub, Dems who consistently support the blatant ASS-RAPING of the citizens of this great nation.

EVERY unbiased opinion poll for the last decade has shown that the MAJORITY of citizens favor Democratic ideals!
Issue by issue, _WE_ are the majority!

Yet the DLC has consistently used every means at its disposal to favor the Repub MINORITY, supporting only those who favored the causes of the opposition.

Luckily, some of us woke up and realized that the DLC is nothing but a 'fifth column' of treasonous corporate shills who have infiltrated the Democratic Party from the inside.

They are a CANCER upon the body politic. _OUR_ body politic.

The damage they have caused to our party was no mistake. It was a carefully-orchestrated plan, well-laid and well executed.
They are doing all that they can to hasten the DEATH of the USA, and preparing the way for the rise of the CORPORATIONS.

The DLC are TRAITORS of the first order. Treason has its rewards...for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Buh-bye DLC!
And take those spineless ones with you!

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. While it's true...
...that the DLC itself is 'going nowhere'...they still have considerable control over the party and have enough remaining power to influence the next election...and perhaps the one after that.

We just might have to contend with a DLC-sponsored candidate in 2008. If this wasn't bad enough...the way the DLC uses corporate cash and media to push other candidates out of the way makes it a very uneven playing field. The DLC did to Dean what Bush did to McCain by making him appear too 'unstable' to get the nomination. We can't allow this to happen again and need to insist on an even playing field for all candidates...allowing The People to choose instead of the corporations.

You'll see the DLC pushing Kerry, Hillary or some other DLCer in 2008 and once again the progressives won't be given a chance by the party insiders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I will be actively supporting as many NON DLC candidates in primaries
as I can find. My dollars will go directly to the candidates of DFA, until Dean can assure me that DNC dollars will not go to DLC candidates until after the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Dean pretty much IS the DNC now
the DLC is broken, because it lost all its credibility with the failure of the Kerry campaign in 2004.

They won't have the same influence they did before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. This is my favorite part...
"No candidate embodied the New Democrat ethos better than Lieberman, whose moral purity, hawkish views and name recognition earned him early Beltway supporters. Thus, when Howard Dean came into view, the DLC was quick to underestimate Dean's potential resonance with Democratic voters, misjudge the transformative nature of his campaign and mischaracterize the ideological bent of many of his supporters. After supporting a losing candidate in Lieberman, the unpopular war in Iraq and an outdated platform, attacking Dean was the only way the DLC could shift the Democratic debate."

I will work tirelessly against this sham of a democrat if we can float a progressive against him. No pass for this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. amen to that
Lieberman is out of touch with CT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. hahahahaha n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. K
ick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. kick
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC