Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone in this administration is seriously misleading South Korea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 09:41 PM
Original message
Someone in this administration is seriously misleading South Korea
about what they can expect from us.

BLITZER: There was a story in the Financial Times that quoted a South Korean defense ministry paper on February 5th that said this: "In case of an emergency on the Korean Peninsula, the United States has a plan to send more than 40 percent of its entire navy, more than half of its air force, and more than 70 percent of its Marine Corps to defend South Korea."

Is that true?

BAN: Yes.

BLITZER: That's the U.S. plan, based on the information the U.S. government has given you?

BAN: We have been maintaining combined defense posture, together with -- between the United States and the Republic of Korea. We have been assured by or (ph) even strengthened defense capabilities by the United States. And we are maintaining very close alliance with the United States.

BLITZER: So you're not concerned that the U.S. military may be overstretched right now because of the fighting in Iraq?

BAN: We think that the United States has enough capabilities to deal with all these regional conflicts while they are concentrating their military forces in Iraq. I think the United States and Koreans in close combined defense capabilities can maintain and can deal with any threats.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0502/13/le.01.html


If that freakin' Blitzer was a responsible journalist he would have kept on this until the end of the show.

South Korea has been lied to by the * administration and no one in the media is questioning this impossible-to-keep pledge.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just add "readily available" as a qualifier
to "40 percent of its entire (readily available) navy", "more than half of its (readily available) air force", and "more than 70 percent of its (readily available) Marine Corps", and it makes sense. (We might even actually do something like this -- or we might have other plans.)

With Soviet-style pronouncements (and "news"), one has to use a Soviet-style of "readership".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Overstretched would signal very little readily available to us.
I hope South Korea is hip to the nuances of shrubspeak. It sounded, though, like poor Ban is expecting a crowd.
No wonder Leslie changed the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh well.
The logistics, at least, would appear transparent... and these do not become easier in combat situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC