Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean has often said we need to go after their perceived strengths.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:57 AM
Original message
Dean has often said we need to go after their perceived strengths.
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 12:59 AM by madfloridian
You attack their strengths. Think about it. That is what they have done. They have taken our issues and beat us to death with them.

On Edit: No particular reason for posting this...it just came to my mind. I have seen them continue to this every day. It is tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. And this IS THE KEY.
Rove is a school yard bully. How do you counter that?

"You're politicizing the issue"

Betchur @ss. We stand up for our people.

"Oh, another left coast liberal".

Yeah, like the Founders of this great country.

(You get the idea. They make a charge, we affirm it in the most positive terms. It's not rocket science, folks. Whatever they accuse us of, we take it back to them.)

Beth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. What are their strengths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Their "perceived" strengths....
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. their "perceived" strengths are "values"
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 05:59 AM by radfringe
Since Reagan they've beaten the Values Drum, waved the Bible and wrapped themselves in the flag...

They have portrayed themselves as the ONLY ones who are capable of defending "values"

problem is -- they haven't defined those values, except to encapsulate it in more warm-fuzzies

Although most people felt that Clinton's "affair" was a personal matter and shouldn't be in the public limelight -- the repugs used it to further the notion that Dem's lack "values"

It's going to take some doing -- but Dems have to force repugs to define those "values" in real terms and explain how the repug agenda supports those "values" beyond the warm-fuzzies

Saying you are a compassionate conservative is one thing -- demonstrating that "compassion" is another matter. Words are cheap - deeds are something else.

repugs speak of people needing to be responsible for their own lives -- yet we see proposals/legislation pouring out which restricts and prohibits personal freedoms and dictates how people should behave -- and then they spin excuses for their own members who have questionable "values" -- this is taking responsibility?

Repugs speak of holding people accountable -- yet they manipulate and spin rules in order to provide loopholes for their own members to avoid accountablility, they pass the blame, distort, and twist issues to duck accountability and responsibility

So, exactly and specifically, what are the values the repugs hold so dear? What are they and how are they supporting those values? Where's the compassion and how is it demonstrated beyond warm-fuzzy words?

Dems need to come out and say -- Here's our "values" and this is how we support it. Dems need to stop backing down with their tail between their legs and opting for the "bi-partisan cooperation" excuse -- repugs are NOT interested in being bi-partisan, they are most definitely MY-Partisan in their deeds

Maybe with Dean the dems will grow a spine and some balls instead of floundering around like a neutered jellyfish




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Then we hit them on national security
Duh..
I've been saying this for years.
Hit them on "faith."
Post the Beatitutes, welcome the Interfaith Council into your neighborhoods, LEARN THE PARTS OF THE BIBLE IN WHICH JESUS PREACHES TOLERANCE. Even if it's not what you believe, it stops 'em cold (believe me, I do it all the time. I'm a Biblical "expert" in that I've read it cover to cover five times in my life and will be reading it again, to my son, upon finishing Harry Potter, each night, upon his request - yes, we believe in diversity! LOL!)
BTW, while you're at it, read the Qu'ran and the Talmed. Both beautiful books of faith.
Then we hit them on trust.
Social Security - they're taking away the most trustworthy thing the government has ever done. STOP THEM.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. They are terrible on National security. They let 9/11 happen.
Then Condi lied and she had no warnings. Bush lied about who did it. They really are bad on security. Look at the mess we are in in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Absolutely right
Yet this is where their biggest strength lies, God knows how or why. We have to reclaim national security and a rational national defense policy, which uses diplomacy first and war as only the last resort, when absolutely, unquestionably necessary.

The recent Gallup Poll showed 89% think terrorism is very or extremely important; the "Iraq situation" also 89% very or extremely important. In contrast, they viewed same-sex marriages or civil unions as only 40% very or extremely important. Many of these people probably voted Bush, even when they didn't want to, but given the choice between a clear national security message and a less than clear one, or a less articulated one, or a less promoted one, they caved.

Many in the Party seem to see the importance of this, including Howard Dean, which is why I supported him for DNC chair.

We have to regain national security and defense as a Democratic value, woven into our message and platform. Unless the country regains trust in the Party on this, we can never win in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Yes, yes yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You understand, though, that this runs counter in my mind
to running someone because they're a general, though, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZootSuitGringo Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am glad that Dr. Dean said this.
Because I have just posted an article that I just read in the media and they are trying to report things in a different light (as always) from what the good Doctor is talking about in this here thread.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1589388&mesg_id=1589388

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeh, that was a real cute post.
Really good one. Should be fun..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZootSuitGringo Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's in the Newspapers
I don't think that it is cute at all. Why do you say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Think.
Reason. Be alert to what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZootSuitGringo Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. self-delete. nt
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 08:42 AM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. I can see that just think........
Traditional conservative issues include economic responsibility, freedom from government interference, stop illegal immigration.

A republican hasn't had a balanced budget in my lifetime, and this administration is particularly bad. The government is interfering in everything nowadays. Trying to dictate decisions that should only be made between a woman and her doctor, the patriot act, mandating testing to schools when they should be TEACHING, there are other examples. And now president bush wants to open the borders and give amnesty to illegal immigrants. This should be more than enough to beat them over the head with. Michael Savage often says, the republicans have become the democrats and the democrats are trying to be the republicans. If he sees it, surely other people see it. Hopefully all of them are not crazy crotchety old men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, and we have to move into the South.
One way or another. We have to go for the throat, no pussyfooting around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. yep. their perceived strengths are pretty much; percieved.
Kerry did a good job of this during the election, probably not enough, but it was new to the democrats. It all came with the new progressive movement with help from people like dean, lakoff, moveon, etc, and this year the democratic party caught on.

The obvious misconceptions are fiscal conservatism,(wise) foreign policy, national security, pro life (beyond the fetus), privacy, smaller government, smaller taxes,religous values, etc. that's just a short list, they've broken every single one of their rules, values, ethics, principles, morals,etc. They stand on lies, we stand on truth. We have to comfront them truth as well as bring it to the american people. It's all about perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. Perceived strengths of the R's:
Personal liberty

Fiscal responsibility

Lower taxes

Less government interference

I'm sure there's more, but you get the picture. In all of the above, they have FAILED.

We attack them with these issues, they lose. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. It makes sense to me...
in WWII, I do not believe the 8th Air Force bombed the German flag making industries. Rather, they bombed the plants making aircraft and tanks! I am so glad Dean is going to lead the charge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dean was real good at exposing the "fiscally responsible" myth
his best riffs on the campaign stump where when he hit them for the wreckless way they've racked up debt and defecit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. That's another one
Really, really good and we can work that effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC