Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't sweat about the NJ poll. The interpretation of it is misleading.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:38 AM
Original message
Don't sweat about the NJ poll. The interpretation of it is misleading.
The 46-46 tie occurs when the pollsters push undecideds to choose one candidate or another. It is also filtered to include only the perceived likely voters. It doesn't show much of a trend away from Kerry, and bush's number is stable at about 46%, which is a loser for him.

If the election for president were being held today, and the candidates were John Kerry the Democrat, George W. Bush the Republican, and Ralph Nader the Independent, for whom would you vote? (If undecided q1) As of today, do you lean more to Kerry, Bush, or Nader? This table includes 'Leaners'.

.................................JK..........GB
Oct 27, 2004............46..........46
Oct 19, 2004............49..........45
Oct 6, 2004..............49..........46
Sep 21, 2004............48..........48


The real numbers are located in the next question asked of registered voters.

If the election for president were being held today, and the candidates were John Kerry the Democrat, George W. Bush the Republican and Ralph Nader the Independent, for whom would you vote? (Registered voters)

............................... JK..........GB
Oct 27, 2004...........45..........41
Oct 19, 2004...........46..........39
Oct 6, 2004.............44..........42
Sep 21, 2004...........47..........43
Aug 25, 2004..........49..........39
Aug 5, 2004............49..........36
Jun 23, 2004...........46..........40
May 20, 2004..........46..........43


Bush's number for registered voters is consistently in the low forties, where he is today. Given past history of undecideds eventually going heavily against the incumbent, bush looks to lose New Jersey by at least 10 pts. It's not until the pollster pushes the undecideds that bush even gets to 46%, which is still a sure loser. I haven't heard yet about either candidate going to Jersey, so their internal polls are telling them it's not in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush was here in NJ last week. But briefly.
And I think Edwards tooled through as well. But that should tell you who has more ground to cover, eh? NJ is going blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wasn't there a Star ledger poll
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 11:43 AM by BrentTaylor
out last week showing Kerry up by double digits. Don't sweat a Quinappec Poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great analysis.
I recall hearing that in 2000, there were similar late poll results showing shrub doing well.

But on election day, NJ Democrats voted for Al Gore and the actual results were basically in line with party affiliation. I think that if Rove really believed they had a shot at NJ, they would be back there again this week. They're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC