|
The New Yorker has an interesting piece on Zogby this week, here's a passage:
"Lately, in fact, has derived some satisfaction from ovserving the wild vacillations of the Gallup election polls - Bush thirteen points ahead in mid-September, eight points ahead at the end of the month, dead even with Kerry on October 4th - because he finds it implausible that such enormous swings reflect actual changes in public opinion. 'I mean, good debate, but it wasn't that good,' he says. He concludes that Gllup's polls are less reliable than his own. 'Zogby is more volatile, but Zogby polls are less volatile,' he says. It's all a matter of technique. "'How do I get a handle on this election or any other?' he asked the road builders. 'I asked on question the Saturday before the election in 2000. I called my call center in Utica and said, "Put this in the poll: 'You live in the land of Oz, and the candidates are the Tin Man, who's all brains and no heart, and the Scarecrow, who's all heart and no brains. Who would you vote for?'" The next day, I called Uitca and said, "Whaddaya got?" They said, "Well, we've got Gore--," I said, "I don't care about Gore. What's Oz?" It was 46.2 for the Tin Man and 46.2 for the Scarecrow. It was right there that I knew I wasn't going to know what was going to happen. But I asked this question again two weeks ago and the Tin Man led by ten points.'"
|