Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex FBI Head Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up! (WSJ)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:16 AM
Original message
Ex FBI Head Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up! (WSJ)
From the WSJ via Newsmax (ugh) comes this peculiarly hopeful news. Fresh from his Clinton-bashing book, Freeh now is tackling the 9/11 Commission, in hopes of pinning the whole deal on Clinton. Which of course is hilarious...be careful what you wish for, Louis baby. This could be huge!


Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up

NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, Nov. 17, 2005

Former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh slammed the 9/11 Commission Thursday saying it ignored – or "summarily rejected" – the most critical piece of intelligence that could have prevented the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal's opinion page, Freeh gave a blistering review of the Commission and says new revelations indicate it is "a good time for the country to make some assessments of the 9/11 Commission itself."

(snip)

Freeh maintains that the Able Danger intelligence, if confirmed, is "undoubtedly the most relevant fact of the entire post-9/11 inquiry . . . Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant."

(snip)

Though Freeh never blames any Clinton administration officials by name, responsibility for the intelligence failure would squarely fall on the Clinton administration as Able Danger's information was uncovered before George Bush became president.


http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/11/17/122900.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StrafingMoose Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Freeh should also talk about the WAMY investigation...


and how the FBI was told by the administration to step away from the bin Ladens and WAMY trough field order 199-i WF 213 589. 199 and other obstructions.

The FBI had wayyyy enough information to act upon, but key bureaucratic chokepoints decided not to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tofubo Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. and george took the information and did what with it ??
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 12:16 PM by tofubo
nothing, closed the shop down, and blindly sailed on with the good ship MIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. So sorry NewsMax
Though Freeh never blames any Clinton administration officials by name, responsibility for the intelligence failure would squarely fall on the Clinton administration as Able Danger's information was uncovered before George Bush became president.

That's not exactly correct NewsMax, that intelligence failure is a result of Schoomaker not telling Clinton and Clarke about ABLE DANGER. And Zelikow not telling the 9/11 Commission. Check out Schoomaker see what he's up to now, maybe you could ask him a few questions before you print crap in your paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think it's actually from WSJ
I hated to post something from Newsmax but WSJ is pay site. I think they just reran the WSJ article verbatim. Of course the WSJ is not exactly open minded when it comes to politics.

I just really enjoy the sublime irony of Freeh, of all people, going after the 9/11 commission. Of course it's a huge coverup. But what under Freeh's supervision got covered up? John O'Neill..Colleen Rowley..Sibel Edmonds...

How can Freeh really want this investigation reopened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC