Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lee Hamilton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:00 AM
Original message
Lee Hamilton
In several articles about Philip Shenon's forthcoming book, Lee Hamilton is quoted as a character witness for Zelikow. For example:

Former Rep. Lee Hamilton, the panel's Democratic vice chairman, praised Zelikow as a "person of integrity" who was upfront in disclosing his background and White House contacts. It made sense for commission staff to contact the White House regularly to get information, Hamilton said, and the book also notes that Zelikow was such a dogged negotiator that even then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales found him irritating and subsequently refused to meet with him.

"Did he try to sway the report to protect the administration? I think the answer was no," Hamilton told the AP.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWQCjbQNbAq13eIw2NMreAthexSgD8UJ4S400">Link


What needs to be addressed is Hamilton's own conduct. IMO, he has as much to answer for as Zelikow. Robert Parry has done a lot of research on Iran Contra and doesn't have flattering things to say about Hamilton:

Correct. Eugene Hasenfus survived the crash and began talking about what was actually going on. And that sort of put Hamilton back on the spot. When the Iran-Contra scandal sort of broke open in November of ‘86, he was made head of the investigation. But again, he led it in a way that was not designed to find the truth. It was designed to sort of reach a political solution, which was not to have impeachment of Ronald Reagan, not to have it go too far, not to damage the CIA. It wasn’t to find the facts, as much as it was to sort of reach a consensus that enough people could agree on.

And we’ve seen that repeatedly with Hamilton. We saw it in the October Surprise investigation, which he headed in 1992, which, when at the end of that investigation so much evidence was pouring in, in late 1992, about this 1980 matter that the chief counsel, Larry Barcella, went to Hamilton and said, “We need another three months, another few months to review all this new incriminating evidence about the Republicans.” And Hamilton said “No,” that “we’re not going to continue this. We’re wrapping it up.”

Link

IMO, Hamilton's 9/11 Commission work fits Parry's description. I find it disconcerting that the AP story (and others as well) seems to imply that Hamilton is a credible source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hamilton is playing the CYA card -- he knows the lid is coming off of 9-11. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC