Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IOF Targets Press Car Northern GS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:23 PM
Original message
IOF Targets Press Car Northern GS
http://english.wafa.ps/body.asp?field=tech_news&id=2028

BEIT HANOUN, January 10, 2005, (WAFA) - Palestinian medics said early Monday that the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) opened fire at a group of local and foreign journalists in their car, critically wounding the driver near Israeli crossing of Beit Hanoun.

Medics told WAFA that the IOF, stationed at the area, targeted a group of local and foreign journalists in their car which was driving near the crossing, wounding the driver, Ayman Mas'oud 35, who was on his way convey the journalists out Gaza Strip (GS) after covering yesterday's Palestinian presidential elections. Medics added that Masoud was critically wounded with a live bullet in the belly.

Meanwhile, a citizen was wounded in Abu Safia area, northern GS when Israeli troops, stationed at high towers in the area, opened heavy machineguns at Ahmed Muqat 19, a peasant. They arrested him after being wounded, locals said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. any article that has in its headline...
``IOF`` instead of THE IDF ...is definitely biased, one sided , irrelevant...

...and hardly worthwhile being read...let alone being posted.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. sez you...
...and you're clearly a voice of objectivity. In what way is the term "Israeli Occupation Force" an inaccurate description? How about "ILLEGAL Israeli Occupation Force?" Or maybe "Israeli Occupation Force that's been in contravention of U.N. Security Council Resolutions for just about as long as anyone can remember?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How about...
Israeli DEFENCE force, Hero`s of the Jewish nation...13Million Jewish supportters (and 244 Jewish non supporters),did I say OUR heros...

.....my best friends serve BTW.....I bought em pizza`s and so you should you.... www.pizzaidf.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. hey queer....
i never got pizza.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I've sent before...i will do it again tonite...in honor of pelsar
Pizza & Soda
Pizza & Soda for a patrol
1 pizza pie & 1 bottle of soda (5 soldiers) 16.95
$16.95


Pizza & Soda for a section 31.95
2 pizza pies & 2 bottles of soda (10 soldiers)
$31.95


Pizza & Soda for a platoon 89.95
6 pizza pies & 6 bottles of soda (30 soldiers) 1
$89.95


Pizza & Soda for a company
18 pizza pies & 18 bottles of soda (90 soldiers) 269.70
$269.75


A Full Month of Pizza 61.95
1 pizza pie & 1 bottle of soda
each week for a month
(Tell us how many months,
and we will bill you monthly.)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. So,if the squad manages to execute ....
a schoolgirl,does this company pick up the tab?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Mongo Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. company benefits
Company membership and benefits are at times limited to religious beliefs. Those denied membership are also denied benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No?
I will have to send a platoon size pizza tonight then...


:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashiebr Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. "biased, one sided , irrelevant...and hardly worthwhile being read.."
But this isn't?

"Hero`s (sic) of the Jewish nation (sic)... OUR heros (sic)..."

LOL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. and the point is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. CNN....talked about the press
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 12:42 PM by pelsar
CNN had a very interesting discussion (yesterday) with journalists within this conflict....many who have been shot at, etc.

bottom line was quite interesting. They all said (from both sides of the line) that the press is respected here more than any other conflict.

They know they're in a combat zone, and they know that decisions are made in split seconds and sight lines are not always clear.....

they addmited that there is definitly pressure from the various jihadnikim on what they can and cannot report, with the consequences being more than having their press card revoked. The amercan-arabs reported "not being liked" because they are americans by the palesteniains...

oh and beit Hanoun, these days is the "hottest' place in gaza, with palestenians shooting mortors in that area every day with the IDF also firing.....so its a bit dangerous to drive through.

oh yea another little detail: Abu Safia area, thats the staging area of sneaking in to the N. settlements....no innocent civilians hang around there, and if they arrested him, it means he was on the wrong side of the fence-a military area.....tsk tsk tsk, such poor journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. So..which "pelsar" is going to show up today....
the one that says I-didn't-vote-for-Sharon, or the one that says An-attack-on-ShinBet/IDF/Israeli-Government-is-an-attack-on-all-Isrealis?

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. one and the same.....
Edited on Wed Jan-12-05 08:34 AM by pelsar
i may not agree with sharons policies (at least not all)....nor did many of the palesteians agree with arafats policies....

doesnt mean we dont identify with our respective govts. More than that, we see our responsability toward our govt as an essential part of our democracy.

it seems you have trouble understanding that we actually identify with our govt and see it as a part of us. We appreciate the work of our defense agencies, we know how hard they work to keep our lives secure, and we also know that those people are not some "entity" but our neighbors, our kids and our friends

btw there is a difference between critizim and demonizing....critiizim of the israeli govt/shin bet/mossad is fine as long as one sticks to the facts and doesnt try fantasying (as in many many articles/tv programs/movies...)-try it, it might make us human!

but it seems you dont understand how i can disagree with the PM or govt and still defend them....its not hard, critisim and disagreement doesnt mean we "disown them."

It must be an awful feeling to live in a country where you dont feel part of the govt, as if it doesnt represent you, protect you or that you have no voice in it..or that the defense forces are some "foreign entity" that you have no control over.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're correct in saying that I don't understand...
how anyone can defend Sharon;to defend him is to support him.That completely baffles me,I really cannot understand how anyone,nevermind a liberal or leftie,or progressive,or whatever can say he is a "Man-Of-Peace".

Does not that support cut both ways? Does not defending all of the actions of your military,even the abuse & illegality mean that you are compliant in those actions?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Englander..
Edited on Wed Jan-12-05 10:10 AM by pelsar
granted its not simple and infact whereas if Iook over at the palestenians I wonder: how could they have supported arafat?....and I dont understand, until I look at my own society and see how we do the same...I'll get back to you on this, I have to think about how to write it.....and explain the israeli society which is based on massive contradictions, the carrying of a lot of historical baggage, a bit of eastern culture, some west and a lot of "make it as we go along"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Englander...installement 1
Edited on Wed Jan-12-05 12:02 PM by pelsar
sharon.
no one I know is saying he is a "man of peace" he is a "bulldozer" a pragmatic person, he gets things done. That much is pretty much agreed to by all.

All of our security forces agree that there is no military solution to the present conflict. So whats left is when the pragmatic leaders take charge to move toward a non military solution. Sharon, ever the pragmatic person, appears to be doing this.

Part of the understanding of israeli society is to understand that only the "right" can make peace with the arabs. Israel is roughly split 50/50 between right and left. Which means neither side has the power to make any strong political moves. When the right moves (Sadat) toward peace, the left moves with it, That consequently splits the right in to two less powerful camps, and a political change can then occur.
(this happend with sadat and with oslo-as the right joined with rabin)

Either way, we do believe our politicians believe in their causes.

But what of the IDF, its excesses. Yes they exist. You cant put an 18yr old kid, with very little experience in life, especially life and death decisions and expect them to do the right thing all the time.-only a fool could expect that. Our 18-20 yr olds have a lot expected out of them, and for the most part they come through. But if you ask in general do I support them-Damn right. I support them as I support my kids when they screw up at school. Dont you support your family/friends even when they screw up?

The IDF, the mossad, etc aren't some entity...when I go in the reserves and i get a briefing what to expect, I take that very seriously. When the soldiers I replace (be they kids or older reserves) tell me whats been happening, what they did etc, i listen carefully. They explain the mistakes they made, the times they almost shot the wrong person and why, where the jihadnikim hide out between the non combatants, etc Thats the IDF that I know of....its not some "entity" its made up of kids, older adults, homosexuals, girlfriends, etc....people.

The abuse, when it happens is not done by the IDF, its done by individual soldiers-them i dont support when it happens. But I also know that few things that actually happen are so black and white, so I am not so quick to yell guilty, And those of us who have been in those situations know just how difficult some decisions are or how simply some are when you dont have all the information.-which leads to mistakes. Or how sometimes you let your intuition lead....and that too is a very shaky ground with which to make decisions upon, that may or may not prevent loss of life or it may lead to more mistakes....

Its easy to support the IDF, since that means supporting myself, it doesnt mean supporting those who abuse their power, and some are punished for it and some get away with it. (The truth be told, and its no secret, the occupation is destroying the values of our youth, but thats something else)

and a bit of our society. Wasnt it about a month ago the UN had palestenian solidarity day?....you know how i felt?...here the world body is basically saying: you israelis are evil, we, the whole world, supports the palestenanians against you.....for me it was if nothing has changed since jewish history began. I look around at the worlds conflicts and cant for the life of me figure out why us? everywhere else they kill by the thousands, they wipe out cities and yet were the "evil of evils"......forget the politics for a minute, just that feeling makes me feel as is my back is to the wall. We need peace, but not any price, any price is where we've been, and it doesnt lead to good things for us.

that mentality is pervasive within israel. We dont trust the UN, we dont really trust anybody. Countries all act in their own interests, we have only ourselves to lean on. And that little UN palestenian day only reaffirms that feeling.

So Sharon? He gets us out of Gaza, I'll support him...thats him being the pragmatic...and thats what we are more than anything. Most of us, dont have illusions, or god protecting us. We look at the situation from a realistic point of view and make our decisions based on our past and present info.

With the palestenians? we dont know what they want from us, some say this, some say that, we do know, from a purly pragmatic point of view, we're not going to expose ourselves until we know for sure. We dont have to take chances with our own destruction, nor do we have to lower our head, pretend were not jewish, etc (first time in thousands of years). Until its clear to us, without a doubt that we are accepted here, only then will we let down our guard...and its the IDF, the mossad, the shin bet and all those people working 24/7 that are right now pouring over photographs, waiting on hilltops, freezing that are doing that protection, while I play on my computer...and I appreciate that.

i guess thats my bottom line....the IDF, the israeli govt are not entiies but people trying their best in impossible situations, to keep israel secure, and they believe in what they are doing.

The core values of the govt are those that I believe in: civil rights, democracy, etc. Their applications in the impossible situation of a war in a civilian environment makes its very difficult, but the attempts to balance the needs of the military vs civil rights are there. (neither are perfect nor would I expect them to be...way too many factors involved)

i would question if you would find such attempts anywhere else in the world, hence I can easily support both my govt and my army in those attempts. The application is far from perfect, but in an ever changing violent environment made up of people it simply cannot be, to believe otherwise is to believe in fairytales and illusions.

hope that explains something about us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. A belated response;
Thanks for that,most of which,I think, you've already said.

The problem is this; Sharon has the responsibility for at least two incidents that could be described as massacres on his CV.All your claims of believing in democracy,& civil rights,& not targeting civilians count for little,when you elect Sharon as your PM.

The problem for Israel is this; your country is the last of the European colonialist adventures,the last of the "New World" imperial settlements.Unfortunately for Israel,you've turned up late to the party,& chosen to create yer State in the latter half of the 20th century,the era of human rights,of international law & the UN,of mass media. All the "ethic cleansing" & clearances, and removal of the local population,that is required to make your wee piece of heaven,has taken place in front of a global audience.

Concerning the IDF when was the last time a soldier was charged with man-slaughter after any incident involving Palestinian civilians & the use of lethal force?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. englander.....
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 04:15 PM by pelsar
us turning up late....yes theres a lot to that, as were probably the last of the "colonialist adventures"...but at the sametime we both know that calling it a colonialist adventure after WWII is a simplistic/superficial way of looking at it. The jews werent going there to exploit the arabs...but then thats not the way the arabs see it (or some europeans)....so that has to be accepted as part of the equation.

as far as charging a soldier with manslaughter....you will find that armies are very reluctant to do such a thing for several reasons. One is that soldiers are not policeman, dont have their training and dont have the same environment, you cant use civil law within a military environment.

but theres another reason, the real one. When a soldier is charged with manslaughter or whatever it affects the whole army, Combat soldiers have a special relationship to one another and if one is charged, the reasons have to be so blatant (like killing the 13yr old girl) that other combat soldiers are ashamed of that person. Why? so that other soldiers wont hesitate when they have to pull the trigger. A combat soldier has to feel confident, that his buddies will "watch his 6" when the shit flies....that the army is behind him when it comes to shooting and killing. If a soldier is accused and even if during trial he is declared innocent...it doesnt matter, the confidence is lost amongst his fellow soldiers. Hence armies are very very reluctant to acuse their own of man slaughter etc., which is why its rare.

as far as lethal force goes or "too much force"...thats what were trained to do during a war.....Overpowering force is what successful armies do....just because the palestenians dont wear uniforms does not make this any less a war. If and when we get shot at, we intentionally use overpowering lethal force....it keeps us alive.

I dont know of a single combat soldier who would "withhold" blowing up that SOB with everything hes got, just so a reporter could write " today the IDF used just the right amount of weaponry to kill the palestenians shooting at them"

of coures if I mention that, i know a couple of guys who might die laughing......

and sharon?....this is the middle east, just a mubarak believes sharon is the right person to deal with, i would think this should give you pause and wonder why... The simple reality is that only israels "right" can make peace.

The demonazation of sharon, is actually way out of proportion, his past is not "squeaky clean, nor will I defend many of his actions, nor do we forget it was he that "bulldozed his way across the canel in 73".....but if we were to really compare honestly his actions and others within the world, it would be obviouse that its just another form of demonaztion, there are/were far worse. And that perhaps is why you cant see beyond his past to his present series of decisions (assuming he follows through). But his election as PM doesnt not effect our court systems, doesnt affect our way of govt, our laws that protect civil rights etc...we remain a democracy

btw, given the political fight hes having it should be obvious even to you, that in fact it is only sharon that can pull us out of Gaza, so you may not like the idea, but in the long run, assuming he pulls this off, you can be thankful that he was elected (assuming that the goal is peace between us and the palestenians).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Pelsar;
"The jews werent going there to exploit the arabs"

Oh no,the settlers were just there to admire the scenery?!?

IDF charged with manslaughter;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1374851,0...

"The Israeli soldier on trial for killing the British peace activist Tom Hurndall in the Gaza Strip has admitted he was lying when he said his victim was carrying a gun, but said he was under orders to open fire even on unarmed people.

Sergeant Idier Wahid Taysir is charged with manslaughter for shooting Mr Hurndall, 22, as he tried to shelter children on the edge of Rafah from Israeli army gunfire in April last year. He died of his injuries in January."

IDF not charged with manslaughter;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1358173,0...

"An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying he would have killed her even if she was three years old.

The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun's magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month."


As for Sharon,which other PM or world leader has a similar reputation? Who else actually has the word "massacre" on their resume?
Concerning comparisons with current leaders of other nations,who are "far worse"? I notice that you do not give any examples.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Englander...come on.....be serious
Edited on Thu Jan-20-05 01:12 PM by pelsar
i really dont believe we have to go into the classic definition of colonialism....what Britian, France, Germany etc were doing in the Middle East and Africa. Thats a lot different then what brought the main jewish immigration to the middle east - running from europe with the remnants of their lives.....

by your two examples show how difficult it is for an army to charge its own....Captain R should be charged....and Idier is being charged only because of political pressures. Anyway I was just passing on info which may help explain a bit about armies.....(yea I know, im wearing my experience on my sleeve)...It just seem relevant to your question.

Sharons reputation is what it is precisly because of the demonization...as for world leaders(past and present) who have similar or worse, I didnt list them frankly because its too easy to find.....here's a short list, took me all of 15 minutes to find. (I was selective)

in the immediate past we have arafat's little war in jordan (3,500-10,000 dead),
together Assad (the dad) and arafat in Lebanon:-one example:

- June 29 to August 12, 1976 - The Palestinians and Syrians from Tall El Zaatar military Camp and Jisr El Basha, massacred and killed hundreds of civilians and militants before the fall of the Camp.

funny how arafat does not have a similar reputation (the christians of lebanon however have no problem holding him responsable for untold dead...but they dont have a good PR machine

here is a list of thousands that the PLO and syria are blamed for....http://www.gotc.org/black_page/chronology.htm

speaking of Syria, how about assad (dad) shelling his own city in 82, hamaa, killing an estimated 10,000-didnt seem to tarnish his reputation any.

Russia, in Chechnyia?....how many dead? cities leveled? and yet no ones been labeled with the massacre lable.

do I seriously have to list all those massacred in the last 30 yrs and how all the leaders responsable arent labled like sharon? We could hop over to Africa, Afganistan..hell almost anywhere, yet only sharon has that lable.

but the best involves Shaba and Shatila, seems a top phalangist information officer is Arafats widows lawyer...

Pierre Rizk, who headed the intelligence service of the Phalanga during the Lebanese civil war and was in close personal contact with the guerrilla group responsible for the massacre at the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camp in 1982.

http://boards.charlierose.com/board/topic.asp?pg=1&ti=9896&ri=156584

for me that kind of "clinches it"...one of the guys closer to the massacre is arafats widows lawyer..and not a "peep" out of the palestenians or a reputation discredited.

I could list more, but i dont think its necessary. His reputation is built far less upon facts as its more of a media thing.I think you fell for it.

these guys caused a lot more people to be killed:

Russias putin
Syria's Assad (dad)
Arafat
Mugabe in Zimbabwe (20,000)
China: Deng Xiaoping, Li Peng (Tiananmen Square)

our latest...
Darfur.....10,000/monthly (leaders names?......)

I'm sure if I did some more research I could come up with a list much larger, but these should suffice......I guess I would like to know how sharon has the massacre on his CV and these guys dont?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Is this satire,or an attempt.....
at humour? I was unaware of this,that it was possible for a corpse to be the PM or leader of a nation? Y'see,I asked about current leaders,y'know, people who are in charge & have responsibility,at this point in time.Like,today.

I think that you wasted those 15 minutes,& pissed away an awful lot of credibility as well. Comparing Sharon to the "worst of the worst",to actual dictators,doesn't help yer arguement in the slightest.

"I guess I would like to know how sharon has the massacre on his CV and these guys dont?"

Because he was actually present at one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qibya_massacre

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,433318,00.html

http://electronicintifada.net/bytopic/historicaldocuments/42.shtml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. the reputation.....
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 06:22 AM by pelsar
perhaps your missing what my point was...its not just about current leaders its about having a reputation....

my query is why him and not many others? and yes it is a precisly a matter of comparison. Note I am not arguing sharons values, the question on my mind is why just him?

your links are all to the same massace....so we have one in which he was the direct commander, (though i dont doubt his complicity in others)

as my list goes there are many others who were involved in far greater ones, yet dont have his reputation...

Though not physically there, we have russias president commanding his troops in chechnia...

isnt Mugabe in Zimbabwe (20,000 dead) still president? who ordered quite a few "slaughters"

Li Peng (Tiananmen Square) is still alive and "kickin"

the others, like arafat, recently deceased are still relevant.

but my favorite being arafats widows lawyer...i like the irony and blatent hypocrasy

just because what i write may not be comfortable or it questions a strong belief, doesnt mean you cant answer as best you can....its a relative question, that directly involves other leaders vs israels.....is there a different yard stick being used to measure israel vs the rest of the world. I claim yes...due to a variety of reasons, if your claiming no, then a comparison is required with the 'worst of the worst".

it doesnt mean to say that "that means what israel does is ok, if what everybody else does is worse-i dont thinkg being compared to Zimbabwa is any kind of compliment (thats not what my point is)...it just means to keep things in proportion. Like you mentioned above, part of israels problem in a matter of timing. If it was established in the 1800's like Australia, the solution today would be to "pay off" the natives so to speak. (your honesty in that was a credit to you -and the timing thing was actually something that never occured to me)

in that light...is sharon really the worse of the worst? or is he simply a good target for the media, given that the spotlight is already focused on the middle east?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Forget about Putin/Mugabe....
They are actual dictators.Nowhere have I suggested,or infered,or given you cause to believe that Sharon is in their league.I am not claiming that Sharon is a dictator.

The reputation has a lot to do with Sharon actually being present at an incident,a massacre.He's unique in that,isn't he? Also having the nickname "bulldozer" doesn't help.Neither does the refusal to negotiate.Or apologise.Not forgetting the tendency to use incendiary rhetoric.

Mon Dieu..is this a first? A poster on i/p giving credit to another?!? I shall return the favour;it is to yer credit that you didn't accuse me of hypocrisy,as I am,after all British.The history of my country is littered with massacres & crimes. There aren't many days that go by when I'm not reminded of Amritsar, or Bloody Sunday I (1920)& II (1972).

ftw,here's the Guardian's take on Chechnya,& Zimbabwe;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/chechnya/0,2759,180787,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/zimbabwe/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. englander.....
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 03:31 PM by pelsar
the history of England isn't really relevant to our discussion on sharon...so there is no reason to mention it (it never even occured to me.....)

as far as being present during the massacre....that may be a first (though I'm sure we could find some of africas past military's dictators...but as mentioned we're not comparing dictators).

ok you've given me pause to think......In terms of democracies he may be unique.
the measure of statesman or quality politician is to measure up to change and put the interests of his country/region/world first beyond his own petty interests and views....and they are a rarity.

is sharon doing this?..at one point when asked about his change, he mentioned that things seen as a PM are different from as a knesset member...so is the same person who radicalized our settler youth (hill top youth) actually going to follow Begins steps and make peace? or at least an environment of non shooting?

Strange as it may seem, his reputation, maybe precisely what makes it works. No one likes dealing with woosys, what he says, he means and he gets done. Thats what Mubarak likes about him, that too, according to the palestenians who have been interviewed have said. He's not known for bluffing.....

and we have a saying here: neogtiations are done with your enemies, not your friends. So though I dont like his demonization, there perhaps maybe something to it, while at the same time, something good may come out of it because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. guess its also hard for you to understand...
the government of Israel currently is a National Unity government far broader than Just Sharon... A truly representative government of ALL the people G-d bless em.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. lol;

Yes,it has "gravitas","weight","substance".It's "broadness","girth" & "width" is ample.It is "solid",has "depth" & "bottom".

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. as I said....
Its hard for YOU to understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. queer....its not really hard to
it simply depends if "you want to". If one takes the simplistic: strong guys are keeping the weak down...then its a black and white issue. In that viewpoint, no one is looking to really understand the real reasons, its just a simplistic "feel good" kind of thing.

for those who dive into the conflict and actually know the history, see us jews as regular people, with a persecution complex (not without reason), see the arab culture as a complex entity....Take the conflict and place it in the world and compare it and all of a sudden its takes a very different unique form.

Nothing is clear, nothing is certain, nothing is black and white.....the only thing left is an attempt to understand the motives of the players involved, attempt to find some common ground and keep the cheerleaders out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Then enlighten me;
Use yer GREAT knowledge & understanding & GREAT use of capital letters to explain this;

Which party has the most important ministerial posts? How many Arabic,or leftie,or peacenik parties are in the coalition? What's the size of the majority? Who will hold the balance of power? It'll be those guys all dressed in black,with the big beards,won't it?

So,not really a truly representative government,eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Sorry busy day today tending to the sick...
Look it up yourself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Er,dude,have you like....
er,y'know,like ever heard of rhetorical questions,& this guy,like called Socrates...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueerJustice Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Umm
Repeat that in English?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC