Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swiss Vote to Keep Guns at Home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
cowcommander Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:49 PM
Original message
Swiss Vote to Keep Guns at Home
ZURICH—Following an emotional debate over gun control, Swiss voters firmly rejected a referendum that would have forced soldiers to end the longstanding practice of keeping army-issue firearms at home and tightened restrictions over civilian gun ownership.

According to exit polls, 57% of voters rejected the initiative. The referendum sparked a heated debate over the right to bear arms in a country that has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world.

Between 1.2 million and 4.5 million firearms are estimated to be in circulation in Switzerland, putting the Alpine country behind only the U.S. and Yemen in guns per capita.

The number is particularly high because members of the Swiss militia have traditionally keep their army-issued rifles or pistols at home, to be ready to defend the nation at a moment's notice. Switzerland has virtually no standing army, relying instead on conscripted militia for national defense.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703515504576142190857662716.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. So?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. So?, Here's the important points from another article....
Edited on Sun Feb-13-11 03:31 PM by MicaelS
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Home/Archive/Swiss_reject_anti-gun_initiative_.html?cid=29484482

A majority of cantons voted against the initiative. Support came from several, mainly urban regions including Geneva, Basel and Zurich. Opposition was strongest in rural areas in eastern and central Switzerland as well as in the southern Italian-speaking canton of Ticino.

Early opinion polls in January showed the anti-gun initiative enjoying widespread support, but the 13 per cent margin dwindled to just two per cent in the space of three weeks.


(1) Just like in the US, rural voters have a much different values set than urban voters.

(2) Just like in the US polls are often meaningless. People will say one thing in a poll, because they tell the pollsters what they think the pollsters want to hear, then vote the exact opposite when they actually vote.

As the related links to other stores on the left side of the page show, there are many similarities between the debate in the US and Switzerland.

http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Specials/Gun_debate/Campaign/Entrenched_views_prevail_in_Swiss_gun_debate.html?cid=29356690

http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Specials/Gun_debate/Campaign/Emotions_and_tradition_clash_over_anti-gun_move.html?cid=29083616

http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Specials/Gun_debate/News/Results/NGOs_demand_tougher_laws_on_weapons.html?cid=1023954

http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/Specials/Gun_debate/Campaign/Doctors_back_anti-gun_move_to_save_lives.html?cid=29182208

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So, what does the Swiss military have in common with rural America?
not a fucking thing

yup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YllwFvr Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. read it again
There is no military, its a militia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It still has nothing in common with rural America
nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. This was about much more than the Swiss policy on government owned weapons.
Edited on Mon Feb-14-11 01:10 PM by benEzra
Here's the text of the initiative, from proTell:

http://www.pro-tell.ch/cms/images/stories/dokumente/initiative/4.1.002d_d_Initiativtext_0901224.pdf

Die Bundesverfassung vom 18. April 1999 wird wie folgt geändert:
Art. 107 Kriegsmaterial
1 Aufgehoben
Art. 118a (neu) Schutz vor Waffengewalt
1 Der Bund erlässt Vorschriften gegen den Missbrauch von Waffen, Waffenzubehör
und Munition. Dazu regelt er den Erwerb, den Besitz, das Tragen, den Gebrauch und
das Überlassen von Waffen, Waffenzubehör und Munition.
2 Wer Feuerwaffen und Munition erwerben, besitzen, tragen, gebrauchen oder
überlassen will, muss den Bedarf dafür nachweisen und die erforderlichen Fähigkeiten
mitbringen. Das Gesetz regelt die Anforderungen und die Einzelheiten, insbesondere
für:
a. Berufe, bei denen sich der Bedarf aus der Aufgabe ergibt;
b. den gewerbsmässigen Handel mit Waffen;
c. das Sportschützenwesen;
d. die Jagd;
e. das Sammeln von Waffen.
3 Besonders gefährliche Waffen, namentlich Seriefeuerwaffen und
Vorderschaftrepetierflinten
(Pump Action), dürfen nicht zu privaten Zwecken erworben und
besessen werden.
4 Die Militärgesetzgebung regelt den Gebrauch von Waffen durch die Angehörigen
der Armee. Ausserhalb des Militärdienstes werden die Feuerwaffen der Angehörigen
der Armee in gesicherten Räumen der Armee aufbewahrt. Angehörigen der
Armee dürfen beim Ausscheiden aus der Armee keine Feuerwaffen überlassen
werden. Das Gesetz regelt die Ausnahmen, namentlich für lizenzierte Sportschützen.
5 Der Bund führt ein Register für Feuerwaffen.
6 Er unterstützt die Kantone bei Aktionen zum Einsammeln von Feuerwaffen.
7 Er setzt sich auf internationaler Ebene dafür ein, dass die Verfügbarkeit von
Kleinwaffen und leichten Waffen eingeschränkt wird.
Bundesblatt vom 04. September 2007
Initiativtext
24.02.2009


Looks like the prohibitionists were trying to turn Switzerland into a clone of the UK as far as civilian gun ownership, and the UK's policies are out-there even by European standards (which is why the UK Olympic team has often had to travel to continental Europe to practice for various Olympic sports).

Outlawing civilian pump shotguns and semiautos in Switzerland? Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Awww are you mad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. if we could keep ALL the gun users' guns at home that would be good nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Agree. They can have thousands of them, even sleep/shower with them. But keep em out of public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's right, no credible debate
so just be an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. What do you want to debate? Go to it. Tell us why our society is better off w more guns in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish we'd do the same here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. The Swiss have commonsense. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where did you think all those holes in their cheese came from!
When was the last war that the Swiss people had to be ready for at a moments notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YllwFvr Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. and who would dare attack the Swiss...
... when they have everyone's money in the bank?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. They did invade Liechtenstein a couple of years ago - that was a surprise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. How'd the Ovaltine protection amendment turn out?
Edited on Sun Feb-13-11 04:29 PM by TheCowsCameHome
Did they boot Nestle?:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. People usually vote to retain personal power and choice when given a chance to do so
As it should always be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hitler didn't invade swizzerland for a reason.
I guess the Swiss didn't want to lose the tradition that kept them safe in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. A bit too simplistic.
Other reasons include: questionable strategic advantage in doing so, the difficulty of mountain combat, and, probably the best reason of all is that the Swiss were "doing business" with the Nazis anyway so why would the Nazis want to do anything to screw that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrfoot Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm all for them keeping the rifles at home....
but as an aside, wtf is the use of a statistic like: "Between 1.2 million and 4.5 million...."

I hate statistics.


YMMV, of course :)

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC