Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

18 for Rifles, 21 for Handguns...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
BigBluenoser Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:07 AM
Original message
18 for Rifles, 21 for Handguns...
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 09:09 AM by BigBluenoser
Question for the Bloomberg allies...

For the most part semi-automatic handgun hate has pretty much lost its cachet as a political strategy. Focus in recent years has turned towards them Evil Black Rifles (AK, AR) with the rather old-school, wood stocked SKS thrown in for good measure. "Military Style Rifles", "Assault Rifles", or my favorite "High Capacity Military Style Assault Rifles" are the words we read in print and hear on the boob-tube.

Don't you realize that CHILDREN!<>@#!*Y!!!! can buy these evil black rifles of hot lead death??? These EBRs are clearly the most dangerous type of gun and huge societal issue, yet I almost never hear/read at DU how terrible it is that children are allowed to buy Assault Rifles. What's up with that? It's a good meme and you need to work it. I know 18 year olds are children because that is the cut-off age the Brady crew uses to define a child (and sometimes, when the work demands it, even older folks get lumped in there).

Why do you hate my 7.62x39 Saiga and not my 9mm Beretta, why do you hate the SKS and not my 8mm Hakim? (which is a real WTF moment)

I mean, I know you hate them all, but you seem to hate some guns more than others. Your efforts on prohibiting EBRs will be ineffective considering how rarely people use them for criminal deeds. However, if you must focus on those dangerous, dangerous guns, you should adopt this meme.

Seriously, every time you read about an EBR you need to holler and yell about how they sell them to children. Handguns are limited to 21 and up (say this sensibly) but kids can buy an EBR so the age needs to be raised to 21! (It will, to the uninitiated, come across as a very rational suggestion. Heads will nod in agreement.)

Have a great day (This is not a drive-by post, I gotta go to work. Back around 1:30ish CT)

Edited: spoonerisms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Israfel4 Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Have you ever tried to conceal a rifle/shotgun??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeramy Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Have you seen this?
<http://www.kel-tec-cnc.com/sub2000.htm>

Length 29.5 inches, length closed 16 inches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Here's my shorty..
Of course, it doesn't fold out.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeramy Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Damn...
That thing is tiny. I can't even see it as being comfortable to shoot. No stock. Even with the short barrel it looks a little to barrel heavy to shoot pistol style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. With a shoulder strap, works great as a pistol (technically it is a 223 pistol)..
.. not that I'd even try to carry it concealed. It's a range toy, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeramy Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I can see that.
That actually be an AR variant I could shoot effectivly. I'm handicapped with rifles. Right handed and left eye dominant. Pistols are fine, just move the gun ove in front of my left eye. But rifles I've never been able to shoot very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I've got one just like it
Model 1 sales barrel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yup, model1 upper
Edited on Thu Oct-15-09 07:11 PM by X_Digger
Had it put together from virgin lower, LPK, & upper in about 3 hours :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL. Good satire. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBluenoser Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks!
I may have been too subtle for the DU "Read the subject line and comment" crew tho!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. False dichotomy.
Why do you hate my 7.62x39 Saiga and not my 9mm Beretta, why do you hate the SKS and not my 8mm Hakim? (which is a real WTF moment)

This is a false dichotomy. The fact of the matter is the anti-gun crowd hates all of your firearms. It's just a matter of which one they can vilify to maximum effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBluenoser Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. See posts #2 and #4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hate satire.
I absolutely detest satire. I hate having to read something and then on-the-fly transpose everything to its opposite in order to take away the true meaning of what is written. People should say what they mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. *snort* K&R :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. In fairness to the Brady Campaign
They didn't create the age groups which put 19 year-old in with 15 year-olds; that's the way the CDC organizes its data. What the Bradies did do, of course, is refer to the 15-19 age group as "children."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well if the CDC considers 19 year olds to be children why are they in the army? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The CDC *doesn't* consider 19 year-olds to be children
I don't think the CDC selects the cut-off points for age groups in its injury and mortality statistics on the basis of any age-based legal (or social) status. I'll be honest: I don't know why they don't, and arguably, there's good reasons why they should. For example, why lump 15 and 16 year-olds into one group, when the latter are able to hold a driver's license while the former are not? Why lump 17 and 18 year-olds into one group when only the latter can enlist in the armed forces? Why lump 20 and 21 year-olds into the same group, when one cannot legally drink or buy a handgun, and the other can? I have no answers to these questions, and I don't know whether the CDC does. If I had to hazard a guess, the breakdown of age groups is related to stages of physiological and mental development.

What I'm trying to get at is that you can't hold the Brady Campaign accountable for the fact that the CDC doesn't distinguish between 17 year-olds and 18 year-olds in its injury and mortality statistics. But you can't hold the CDC accountable for the fact that the Brady Campaign (or was it still HCI at the time?) presented statistics that included 18 and 19 year-olds as covering only "children."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have three sons
23, 19 and 14. I gave each of the older ones an AR-15 when they turned 18 and I will give one to my youngest son when he hits 18 also. The oldest is not in his senior year and the US Naval Academy, the middle child is going to school at UT EL Paso. They are all well rounded, well grounded young men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC