Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E. Coli Bacteria Engineered to Eat Switchgrass and Make Transportation Fuels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:20 PM
Original message
E. Coli Bacteria Engineered to Eat Switchgrass and Make Transportation Fuels
Edited on Tue Nov-29-11 12:22 PM by OKIsItJustMe
(Moderators, please note, US Government research lab press release—copyright concerns are nil.)

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2011/11/29/e-coli-make-three-fuels/

E. Coli Bacteria Engineered to Eat Switchgrass and Make Transportation Fuels

Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) Researchers Reach Milestone on the Road to Biofuels

November 29, 2011
Lynn Yarris (510) 486-5375 [email protected]

A milestone has been reached on the road to developing advanced biofuels that can replace gasoline, diesel and jet fuels with a domestically-produced clean, green, renewable alternative.

Researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) have engineered the first strains of Escherichia coli bacteria that can digest switchgrass biomass and synthesize its sugars into all three of those transportation fuels. What’s more, the microbes are able to do this without any help from enzyme additives.

“This work shows that we can reduce one of the most expensive parts of the biofuel production process, the addition of enzymes to depolymerize cellulose and hemicellulose into fermentable sugars,” says Jay Keasling, CEO of JBEI and leader of this research. “This will enable us to reduce fuel production costs by consolidating two steps – depolymerizing cellulose and hemicellulose into sugars, and fermenting the sugars into fuels – into a single step or one pot operation.”

Keasling, who also holds appointments with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University of California (UC) Berkley, is the corresponding author of a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) that describes this work. The paper is titled “Synthesis of three advanced biofuels from ionic liquid-pretreated switchgrass using engineered Escherichia coli.”

Advanced biofuels made from the lignocellulosic biomass of non-food crops and agricultural waste are widely believed to represent the best source of renewable liquid transportation fuels. Unlike ethanol, which in this country is produced from corn starch, these advanced biofuels can replace gasoline on a gallon-for-gallon basis, and they can be used in today’s engines and infrastructures. The biggest roadblock to an advanced biofuels highway is bringing the cost of producing these fuels down so that they are economically competitive.



E. coli bacteria normally cannot grow on switchgrass, but JBEI researchers engineered strains of the bacteria to express several enzymes that enable them to digest cellulose and hemicellulose and use one or the other for growth. These cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic strains of E. coli, which can be combined as co-cultures on a sample of switchgrass, were further engineered with three metabolic pathways that enabled the E. coli to produce fuel substitute or precursor molecules suitable for gasoline, diesel and jet engines. While this is not the first demonstration of E. coli producing gasoline and diesel from sugars, it is the first demonstration of E. coli producing all three forms of transportation fuels. Furthermore, it was done using switchgrass, which is among the most highly touted of the potential feedstocks for advanced biofuels.



“We already have hydrocarbon fuel production pathways that give far better yields than what we obtained with this demonstration,” says Bokinsky. “And these other pathways are very likely to be compatible with the biomass-consumption pathways we’ve engineered into our E. coli. However, we need to find enzymes that can both digest more of the ionic liquid pre-treated biomass and be secreted by E. coli. We also need to work on optimizing the ionic liquid pre-treatment steps to yield biomass that is even easier for the microbes to digest.”

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106958108
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. So don't drink biofuels. Got it.
Weird how things we fear often have beneficial uses, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would like to know what bi-products come out of this process
The cure might be worse than the disease....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They'll test it on the poor. We'll find out eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They'll put it in our probiotics, then tell us we can live on switchgrass.
I could see that coming from a mile off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. The anti-GMO people will soon be here to say that this will destroy the world.
Edited on Tue Nov-29-11 12:31 PM by Odin2005
Even the diabetic ones who get insulin from GMO E. coli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not a big fan of bio-fuel,
It is better then fossil fuel and this type of bio fuel is better the using corn or another food product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. An older couple in Austria was working on a similar idea
of using bacteria on biomaterials to produce fuel. That must have been in the late 1970s or early 1980s. They were arrested -- yes, arrested. I never understood quite why.

Anyway, this is great news.

But we could have been making a lot of progress on this years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC