Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama Announces Major Initiative to Spur Biofuels Industry…Enhance…Energy Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:59 PM
Original message
President Obama Announces Major Initiative to Spur Biofuels Industry…Enhance…Energy Security
http://energy.gov/articles/president-obama-announces-major-initiative-spur-biofuels-industry-and-enhance-america-s

President Obama Announces Major Initiative to Spur Biofuels Industry and Enhance America’s Energy Security

August 16, 2011 - 11:45am

USDA, Department of Energy and Navy Partner to Advance Biofuels to Fuel Military and Commercial Transportation, Displace Need for Foreign Oil, and Strengthen Rural America

WASHINGTON, Aug. 16, 2011 – President Obama today announced that the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Energy and Navy will invest up to $510 million during the next three years in partnership with the private sector to produce advanced drop-in aviation and marine biofuels to power military and commercial transportation. The initiative responds to a directive from President Obama issued in March as part of his Blueprint for A Secure Energy Future, the Administration’s framework for reducing dependence on foreign oil. The biofuels initiative is being steered by the White House Biofuels Interagency Work Group and Rural Council, both of which are enabling greater cross-agency collaboration to strengthen rural America.

“Biofuels are an important part of reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and creating jobs here at home,” said President Obama. “But supporting biofuels cannot be the role of government alone. That’s why we’re partnering with the private sector to speed development of next-generation biofuels that will help us continue to take steps towards energy independence and strengthen communities across our country.”

Increased use of advanced biofuels is a key component of the Administration’s energy security agenda, but there is currently a lack of this manufacturing capability for next-generation drop-in biofuels in the United States. To accelerate the production of bio-based jet and diesel fuel for military and commercial purposes, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, and Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/SupportDocuments/DPASignedMOUEnergyNavyUSDA.pdf">have developed a plan (PDF - 836kb) to jointly construct or retrofit several drop-in biofuel plants and refineries. This effort will help address energy security and national security challenges, and will provide economic opportunities in rural America.

“America’s long-term national security depends upon a commercially viable domestic biofuels market that will benefit taxpayers while simultaneously giving Sailors and Marines tactical and strategic advantages,” said Navy Secretary Ray Mabus. “Today’s announcement not only leverages our home grown fuel sources to support our national security, but it also helps advance the biofuels market, which ultimately brings down the cost of biofuels for everyone.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The country could get off of oil, but the military can't, and stay as big as they are
The tail wagging the dog again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I dunno, but…
Edited on Tue Aug-16-11 02:44 PM by OKIsItJustMe
The military seems to be leading the Congress when it comes to alternatives.
http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2010/1010_energy/

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=65002

New Task Force to Promote Energy Initiatives

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Aug. 11, 2011 – A new task force to stand up by mid-September will take the Army’s energy initiatives to the next level with a goal of getting 25 percent of the Army’s power from renewable sources by 2025, Army Secretary John M. McHugh announced yesterday.

The Energy Initiatives Task Force for Large-scale Renewable Energy Projects will build on efforts already under way at Army installations worldwide, McHugh said at theGovEnergy Conference in Cincinnati.

The Army already has 126 renewable projects, he noted, including a major solar project at Fort Irwin, Calif., that, once completed, will stretch across an area the size of Manhattan in New York.

“We think we’ve made a great start,” he said, citing initiatives that include microgrids, solar and natural gas. “But to meet our longer-term objectives,” he added, “we have to do better.”



http://www.army.mil/article/54433/army-looking-at-installations-for-pilot-net-zero-program/?ref=news-environment-title1

Army looking at installations for pilot 'Net Zero' program

April 6, 2011

WASHINGTON (Army News Service, April 6, 2011) -- The Army will announce April 19, which posts have been selected to participate in the Pilot Army Net Zero Installation initiative, part of a program to conserve energy, water and waste worldwide.

A Net Zero installation is one that produces as much as it uses over the course of a year. The Army goal is to have by 2020, five Net Zero Energy installations, five Net Zero Water, five Net Zero Waste, as well as one or more installations that are Net Zero in all three categories to serve as models for all Army installations.

"We are identifying installations as candidates for our Net Zero pilot programs to communicate their journey and efforts to reduce energy, water and waste demands," said Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment.

Aggressive conservation and efficiency efforts as well as use of renewable technologies like solar panels are to help installations meet the Net Zero Energy goals, according to Hammack.




http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63548

Green Initiatives Support Energy-Savings Concept

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, April 13, 2011 – Last week’s groundbreaking for a new solar micro grid at Fort Hunter Liggett, Calif., is the latest example of a military “going green” -– saving environmental resources and taxpayer dollars, too.

The 1-megawatt facility, to become operational later this year, will provide one-third of the power for the nation’s largest Army Reserve training post, and ultimately it will save $1 million in energy costs annually, Addison D. “Tad” Davis IV, command executive officer for U.S. Army Reserve Command at Fort Bragg, N.C., told American Forces Press Service.



Davis said he’s seen the military make huge strides in energy conservation. A decade ago, as Fort Bragg’s garrison commander, he introduced the Army’s first installation-wide sustainability program.

Costs largely drove that decision. “As the installation commander for the largest populated military installation in the world here at Fort Bragg, I had the checkbook, and I had to pay the energy bill and the water bill every month,” he said.




You see, the military (unlike Congress) can read the writing on the wall.

Remember the capital’s coal plant?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Power_Plant#Controversy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gotta keep that war machine running!
At least they're not talking about getting everyone driving to Denny's on ethanol any more.

Still, biofuels? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Font size doesn't make it so.
$510 million over 3 years is a PR stunt. Unrec'd for gullibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What can you possibly do for less than 100 Billion. (Right?)
Edited on Tue Aug-16-11 04:39 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/10/6619613-fusion-goes-forward-from-the-fringe

Fusion goes forward from the fringe

By Alan Boyle

A Navy-funded effort to harness nuclear fusion power reports that its unconventional plasma device is operating as designed and generating "positive results" more than halfway through the project.



EMC2 Fusion doesn't have tens of millions of venture capital to play with — but it does have a $7.9 million http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency/RecipientReportedData/pages/RecipientProjectSummary508.aspx?AwardIDSUR=46419&qtr=2011Q1">Navy contract to test a plasma technology known as inertial electrostatic confinement fusion, also known as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell">Polywell fusion. The idea is to accelerate positively charged ions in an electrical cage to such an extent that they occasionally spark a fusion reaction, releasing energy and neutrons. The concept was pioneered by the late physicist Robert Bussard, and carried forward by the EMC2 Fusion team in Santa Fe, N.M.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC