Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Antarctica Loses Ice From East as Well as West, Scientists Say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 09:50 AM
Original message
Antarctica Loses Ice From East as Well as West, Scientists Say
Nov. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Antarctica is losing ice from its larger eastern side as well as the western part, an indication the southernmost continent may add “significantly more” to rising seas, researchers in Texas said.

The eastern sheet lost ice at a rate of about 57 billion metric tons a year from 2002 to 2009, contributing to the continent’s total annual average loss of about 190 billion tons, scientists at the University of Texas at Austin said in the journal Nature Geoscience.

United Nations scientists in 2007 said most of Antarctica’s contribution to rising sea levels amid global warming comes from the western sheet, with the eastern part either holding steady or gaining mass. The latest findings for East Antarctica are “surprising” because they differ from other estimates, said glaciologist Jonathan Bamber, who wasn’t involved in the study.

“I’m surprised because other studies for slightly different time periods have come up with values that are very close to zero,” Bamber, professor of physical geography at the University of Bristol in England, said in a telephone interview. “This result really confirms that there are very substantial inconsistencies between different estimates.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=atJRfSKS0cOA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. And STILL the US pitters, and putters and stutters and REFUSES to cooperate.....
..HOW MUCH TIME do the MORONS think we HAVE? Do they think this WON'T affect THEM too?

Ignorance.
Laziness.
Lack of political will.
GREED.

Gonna do us in. And your children too. AND theirs. Not that anyone gives a crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even though people say they accept Global Warming is a reality I still do not think people
appreciate that even if we dramatically reduced our GHG emissions TOMORROW, it would still take a very long time to start turning things around. The increasing rate at which land based ice is moving off the land into the sea in particular, concerns me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I honestly think the belief in human adaptation is the real driver here.
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 06:45 PM by joshcryer
Slow adaptation to sea level rise, deal with the population displacement, deal with the food shortages, etc. It's unfortunate. Prevention is always better.

edit, wording
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think it is more like ...
... "It's only going to affect some foreigners somewhere, not us."

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Too bad people are too ignorant to realize that their seafront property is going to be worthless.
Being that it'll be underwater and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Link to paper here:
www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo694.html

Our results suggest that over the WAIS (especially the ASE) there is accelerated ice loss since around 2005 and/or 2006, with the EAIS showing correlated changes of the same sign in this period, attributed to increased ice loss over EAIS coastal regions in recent years. Using a simple linear projection for the period 2006-2009, Antarctic ice loss rate can be as large as 220 +/- 89 Gt yr-^1 (see Supplementary Information for details). These new GRACE estimates, on average, are consistent with recent InSAR fluxes but, in contrast to previous estimates, they indicate that as a whole, Antarctica may soon be contributing significantly more to global sea-level rise. More discussion of the results and analysis of uncertainty and variable ice loss rates are provided in the Supplementary Information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Apr 28th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC