Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Statisticians Confirm: No Global Cooling Despite Skeptic Spin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kgrandia Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 07:01 PM
Original message
Statisticians Confirm: No Global Cooling Despite Skeptic Spin
In a massive blow to the climate skeptic movement, the Associated Press has conducted a blind test of statisticians that unequivocally confirms that no global cooling trend exists.

Despite the best efforts of a small handful of climate skeptics, who argue that the globe has cooled rather than warmed since the record hot year of 1998, no such cooling trend has taken place.

The Associated Press conducted the blind test by sending global temperature data from NOAA and NASA to four independent statisticians who were not told what the data represented, but simply asked to perform a common statistical analysis to look for trends in the data.

The statisticians “found no true temperature declines over time,” and in fact identified “a distinct decades-long upward trend in the numbers,” the AP reports.

More: http://www.desmogblog.com/statisticians-confirm-no-global-cooling-despite-skeptic-spin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leanderj Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shocking - UChicago economist calls global warming global cooling
Edited on Mon Oct-26-09 07:15 PM by leanderj
Such RW bullcrap. What is he going to deny next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Its easy to see why Obama decided to go into politics after working at the U. of Chicago.
The place is loaded with wingers....economic, scientific etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Duplicate Topic:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4119651

Now, the above is a Yahoo site, while yours is a Desmogblog site, both are citing the same AP report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I like that it was a blind study, showing that skeptics are indeed motivated by their biases.
Their skeptical claims are rooted in faulty analysis, *because* of their preconceived notions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC